握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > the critique of pure reason >

及96嫗

the critique of pure reason-及96嫗

弌傍�� the critique of pure reason 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




idea。 The conceptions of reality�察�substance�察�causality�察�nay�察�even that

of necessity in existence�察�have no significance out of the sphere of

empirical cognition�察�and cannot�察�beyond that sphere�察�determine any

object。 They may�察�accordingly�察�be employed to explain the

possibility of things in the world of sense�察�but they are utterly

inadequate to explain the possibility of the universe itself

considered as a whole�察�because in this case the ground of

explanation must lie out of and beyond the world�察�and cannot��

therefore�察�be an object of possible experience。 Now�察�I may admit the

existence of an incomprehensible being of this nature´ the object of a

mere idea�察�relatively to the world of sense�察�although I have no ground

to admit its existence absolutely and in itself。 For if an idea

��that of a systematic and complete unity�察�of which I shall presently

speak more particularly�� lies at the foundation of the most extended

empirical employment of reason�察�and if this idea cannot be

adequately represented in concreto�察�although it is indispensably

necessary for the approximation of empirical unity to the highest

possible degree´ I am not only authorized�察�but compelled�察�to realize

this idea�察�that is�察�to posit a real object corresponding thereto。

But I cannot profess to know this object�察�it is to me merely a

something�察�to which�察�as the ground of systematic unity in cognition�察�I

attribute such properties as are analogous to the conceptions employed

by the understanding in the sphere of experience。 Following the

analogy of the notions of reality�察�substance�察�causality�察�and

necessity�察�I cogitate a being�察�which possesses all these attributes in

the highest degree�察�and�察�as this idea is the offspring of my reason

alone�察�I cogitate this being as self´subsistent reason�察�and as the

cause of the universe operating by means of ideas of the greatest

possible harmony and unity。 Thus I abstract all conditions that

would limit my idea�察�solely for the purpose of rendering systematic

unity possible in the world of empirical diversity�察�and thus

securing the widest possible extension for the exercise of reason in

that sphere。 This I am enabled to do�察�by regarding all connections and

relations in the world of sense�察�as if they were the dispositions of a

supreme reason�察�of which our reason is but a faint image。 I then

proceed to cogitate this Supreme Being by conceptions which have��

properly�察�no meaning or application�察�except in the world of sense。 But

as I am authorized to employ the transcendental hypothesis of such a

being in a relative respect alone�察�that is�察�as the substratum of the

greatest possible unity in experience´ I may attribute to a being

which I regard as distinct from the world�察�such properties as belong

solely to the sphere of sense and experience。 For I do not desire�察�and

am not justified in desiring�察�to cognize this object of my idea�察�as it

exists in itself�察�for I possess no conceptions sufficient for or task��

those of reality�察�substance�察�causality�察�nay�察�even that of necessity in

existence�察�losing all significance�察�and becoming merely the signs of

conceptions�察�without content and without applicability�察�when I attempt

to carry them beyond the limits of the world of sense。 I cogitate

merely the relation of a perfectly unknown being to the greatest

possible systematic unity of experience�察�solely for the purpose of

employing it as the schema of the regulative principle which directs

reason in its empirical exercise。

  It is evident�察�at the first view�察�that we cannot presuppose the

reality of this transcendental object�察�by means of the conceptions

of reality�察�substance�察�causality�察�and so on�察�because these conceptions

cannot be applied to anything that is distinct from the world of

sense。 Thus the supposition of a Supreme Being or cause is purely

relative�察�it is cogitated only in behalf of the systematic unity of

experience�察�such a being is but a something�察�of whose existence in

itself we have not the least conception。 Thus�察�too�察�it becomes

sufficiently manifest why we required the idea of a necessary being in

relation to objects given by sense�察�although we can never have the

least conception of this being�察�or of its absolute necessity。

  And now we can clearly perceive the result of our transcendental

dialectic�察�and the proper aim of the ideas of pure reason´ which

become dialectical solely from misunderstanding and inconsiderateness。

Pure reason is�察�in fact�察�occupied with itself�察�and not with any

object。 Objects are not presented to it to be embraced in the unity of

an empirical conception�察�it is only the cognitions of the

understanding that are presented to it�察�for the purpose of receiving

the unity of a rational conception�察�that is�察�of being connected

according to a principle。 The unity of reason is the unity of

system�察�and this systematic unity is not an objective principle��

extending its dominion over objects�察�but a subjective maxim�察�extending

its authority over the empirical cognition of objects。 The

systematic connection which reason gives to the empirical employment

of the understanding not only advances the extension of that

employment�察�but ensures its correctness�察�and thus the principle of a

systematic unity of this nature is also objective�察�although only in an

indefinite respect ��principium vagum��。 It is not�察�however�察�a

constitutive principle�察�determining an object to which it directly

relates�察�it is merely a regulative principle or maxim�察�advancing and

strengthening the empirical exercise of reason�察�by the opening up of

new paths of which the understanding is ignorant�察�while it never

conflicts with the laws of its exercise in the sphere of experience。

  But reason cannot cogitate this systematic unity�察�without at the

same time cogitating an object of the idea´ an object that cannot be

presented in any experience�察�which contains no concrete example of a

complete systematic unity。 This being ��ens rationis ratiocinatae�� is

therefore a mere idea and is not assumed to be a thing which is real

absolutely and in itself。 On the contrary�察�it forms merely the

problematical foundation of the connection which the mind introduces

among the phenomena of the sensuous world。 We look upon this

connection�察�in the light of the above´mentioned idea�察�as if it drew

its origin from the supposed being which corresponds to the idea。

And yet all we aim at is the possession of this idea as a secure

foundation for the systematic unity of experience´ a unity

indispensable to reason�察�advantageous to the understanding�察�and

promotive of the interests of empirical cognition。

  We mistake the true meaning of this idea when we regard it as an

enouncement�察�or even as a hypothetical declaration of the existence of

a real thing�察�which we are to regard as the origin or ground of a

systematic constitution of the universe。 On the contrary�察�it is left

completely undetermined what the nature or properties of this

so´called ground may be。 The idea is merely to be adopted as a point

of view�察�from which this unity�察�so essential to reason and so

beneficial to the understanding�察�may be regarded as radiating。 In

one word�察�this transcendental thing is merely the schema of a

regulative principle�察�by means of which Reason�察�so far as in her lies��

extends the dominion of systematic unity over the whole sphere of

experience。

  The first object of an idea of this kind is the ego�察�considered

merely as a thinking nature or soul。 If I wish to investigate the

properties of a thinking being�察�I must interrogate experience。 But I

find that I can apply none of the categories to this object�察�the

schema of these categories�察�which is the condition of their

application�察�being given only in sensuous intuition。 But I cannot thus

attain to the cognition of a systematic unity of all the phenomena

of the internal sense。 Instead�察�therefore�察�of an empirical

conception of what the soul really is�察�reason takes the conception

of the empirical unity of all thought�察�and�察�by cogitating this unity

as unconditioned and primitive�察�constructs the rational conception

or idea of a simple substance which is in itself unchangeable��

possessing personal identity�察�and in connection with other real things

external to it�察�in one word�察�it constructs the idea of a simple

self´subsistent intelligence。 But the real aim of reason in this

procedure is the attainment of principles of systematic unity for

the explanation of the phenomena of the soul。 That is�察�reason

desires to be able to represent all the determinations of the internal

sense as existing in one subject�察�all powers as deduced from one

fundamental power�察�all changes as mere varieties in the condition of a

being which is permanent and always the same�察�and all phenomena in

space as entirely different in their nature from the procedure of

thought。 Essential simplicity ��with the other attributes predicated of

the ego�� is regarded as the mere schema of this regulative

principle�察�it is not assumed that it is the actual ground of the

properties of the soul。 For these properties may rest upon quite

different grounds�察�of which we are completely ignorant�察�just as the

above predicates could not give us any knowledge of the soul as it

is in itself�察�even if we regarded them as valid in respect of it��

inasmuch as they constitute a mere idea�察�which cannot be represented

in concreto。 Nothing but good can result from a psychological idea

of this kind�察�if we only take proper care not to consider it as more

than an idea�察�that is�察�if we regard it as valid merely in relation

to the employment of reason�察�in the sphere of the phenomena of the

soul。 Under the guidance of this idea�察�or principle�察�no empirical laws

of corporeal phenomena are called in to explain that which is a

phenomenon of the internal sense alone�察�no windy hypotheses of the

generation�察�annihilation�察�and palingenesis of souls are admitted。 Thus

the consideration of this object of the internal sense is kept pure��

and unmixed with heterogeneous elements�察�while the investigation of

reason aims at reducing all the grounds of explanation employed in

this sphere of knowledge to a single principle。 All this is best

effected�察�nay�察�cannot be effected otherwise than by means of such a

schema�察�which requires us to regard this ideal thing as an actual

existence。 The psychological idea is�察�therefore�察�meaningless and

inapplicable�察�except as the schema of a regulative conception。 For�察�if

I ask whether the soul is not really of a spiritual nature´ it is a

question which has no meaning。 From such a conception has been

abstracted�察�not merely all corporeal nature�察�but all nature�察�that

is�察�all the predicates of a possible experience�察�and consequently�察�all

the conditions which enable us to cogitate an object to this

conception have disappeared。 But�察�if these conditions are absent�察�it

is evident that the conception is meaningless。

  The second regulative idea of speculative reason is the c

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��6�� 家��1��

低辛嬬浪散議