the critique of pure reason-µÚ87ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
absolutely¡¡necessary¡¡existence¡£
¡¡¡¡All¡¡illusions¡¡in¡¡an¡¡argument¡¡are¡¡more¡¡easily¡¡detected¡¡when¡¡they
are¡¡presented¡¡in¡¡the¡¡formal¡¡manner¡¡employed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡schools£»¡¡which¡¡we
now¡¡proceed¡¡to¡¡do¡£
¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡proposition£º¡¡¡¨Every¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary¡¡being¡¡is¡¡likewise¡¡an
ens¡¡realissimum£»¡¨¡¡is¡¡correct¡¡£¨and¡¡it¡¡is¡¡this¡¡which¡¡constitutes¡¡the
nervus¡¡probandi¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cosmological¡¡argument£©£»¡¡it¡¡must£»¡¡like¡¡all
affirmative¡¡judgements£»¡¡be¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡conversion¡¡¡the¡¡conversio¡¡per
accidens£»¡¡at¡¡least¡£¡¡It¡¡follows£»¡¡then£»¡¡that¡¡some¡¡entia¡¡realissima¡¡are
absolutely¡¡necessary¡¡beings¡£¡¡But¡¡no¡¡ens¡¡realissimum¡¡is¡¡in¡¡any
respect¡¡different¡¡from¡¡another£»¡¡and¡¡what¡¡is¡¡valid¡¡of¡¡some¡¡is¡¡valid
of¡¡all¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡present¡¡case£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡I¡¡may¡¡employ¡¡simple
conversion£»¡¡and¡¡say£º¡¡¡¨Every¡¡ens¡¡realissimum¡¡is¡¡a¡¡necessary¡¡being¡£¡¨¡¡But
as¡¡this¡¡proposition¡¡is¡¡determined¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡by¡¡the¡¡conceptions
contained¡¡in¡¡it£»¡¡the¡¡mere¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡an¡¡ens¡¡realissimum¡¡must
possess¡¡the¡¡additional¡¡attribute¡¡of¡¡absolute¡¡necessity¡£¡¡But¡¡this¡¡is
exactly¡¡what¡¡was¡¡maintained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡ontological¡¡argument£»¡¡and¡¡not
recognized¡¡by¡¡the¡¡cosmological£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡formed¡¡the¡¡real¡¡ground
of¡¡its¡¡disguised¡¡and¡¡illusory¡¡reasoning¡£
¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡second¡¡mode¡¡employed¡¡by¡¡speculative¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡demonstrating
the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Supreme¡¡Being£»¡¡is¡¡not¡¡only£»¡¡like¡¡the¡¡first£»
illusory¡¡and¡¡inadequate£»¡¡but¡¡possesses¡¡the¡¡additional¡¡blemish¡¡of¡¡an
ignoratio¡¡elenchi¡¡¡professing¡¡to¡¡conduct¡¡us¡¡by¡¡a¡¡new¡¡road¡¡to¡¡the
desired¡¡goal£»¡¡but¡¡bringing¡¡us¡¡back£»¡¡after¡¡a¡¡short¡¡circuit£»¡¡to¡¡the
old¡¡path¡¡which¡¡we¡¡had¡¡deserted¡¡at¡¡its¡¡call¡£
¡¡¡¡I¡¡mentioned¡¡above¡¡that¡¡this¡¡cosmological¡¡argument¡¡contains¡¡a¡¡perfect
nest¡¡of¡¡dialectical¡¡assumptions£»¡¡which¡¡transcendental¡¡criticism¡¡does
not¡¡find¡¡it¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡expose¡¡and¡¡to¡¡dissipate¡£¡¡I¡¡shall¡¡merely
enumerate¡¡these£»¡¡leaving¡¡it¡¡to¡¡the¡¡reader£»¡¡who¡¡must¡¡by¡¡this¡¡time¡¡be
well¡¡practised¡¡in¡¡such¡¡matters£»¡¡to¡¡investigate¡¡the¡¡fallacies
residing¡¡therein¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡following¡¡fallacies£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡are¡¡discoverable¡¡in¡¡this
mode¡¡of¡¡proof£º¡¡1¡£¡¡The¡¡transcendental¡¡principle£º¡¡¡¨Everything¡¡that¡¡is
contingent¡¡must¡¡have¡¡a¡¡cause¡¨¡¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡without¡¡significance£»
except¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sensuous¡¡world¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡purely¡¡intellectual¡¡conception
of¡¡the¡¡contingent¡¡cannot¡¡produce¡¡any¡¡synthetical¡¡proposition£»¡¡like
that¡¡of¡¡causality£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡itself¡¡without¡¡significance¡¡or
distinguishing¡¡characteristic¡¡except¡¡in¡¡the¡¡phenomenal¡¡world¡£¡¡But¡¡in
the¡¡present¡¡case¡¡it¡¡is¡¡employed¡¡to¡¡help¡¡us¡¡beyond¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡its
sphere¡£¡¡2¡£¡¡¡¨From¡¡the¡¡impossibility¡¡of¡¡an¡¡infinite¡¡ascending¡¡series
of¡¡causes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡sense¡¡a¡¡first¡¡cause¡¡is¡¡inferred¡¨£»¡¡a
conclusion¡¡which¡¡the¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡employment¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡do¡¡not
justify¡¡even¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡experience£»¡¡and¡¡still¡¡less¡¡when¡¡an
attempt¡¡is¡¡made¡¡to¡¡pass¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡this¡¡sphere¡£¡¡3¡£¡¡Reason¡¡allows
itself¡¡to¡¡be¡¡satisfied¡¡upon¡¡insufficient¡¡grounds£»¡¡with¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the
completion¡¡of¡¡this¡¡series¡£¡¡It¡¡removes¡¡all¡¡conditions¡¡£¨without¡¡which£»
however£»¡¡no¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡Necessity¡¡can¡¡take¡¡place£©£»¡¡and£»¡¡as¡¡after
this¡¡it¡¡is¡¡beyond¡¡our¡¡power¡¡to¡¡form¡¡any¡¡other¡¡conceptions£»¡¡it
accepts¡¡this¡¡as¡¡a¡¡completion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡it¡¡wishes¡¡to¡¡form¡¡of
the¡¡series¡£¡¡4¡£¡¡The¡¡logical¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡a¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡total¡¡of
reality¡¡£¨the¡¡criterion¡¡of¡¡this¡¡possibility¡¡being¡¡the¡¡absence¡¡of
contradiction£©¡¡is¡¡confound¡£¡¡ed¡¡with¡¡the¡¡transcendental£»¡¡which¡¡requires
a¡¡principle¡¡of¡¡the¡¡practicability¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡synthesis¡¡¡a¡¡principle
which¡¡again¡¡refers¡¡us¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡experience¡£¡¡And¡¡so¡¡on¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cosmological¡¡argument¡¡is¡¡to¡¡avoid¡¡the¡¡necessity¡¡of
proving¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡necessary¡¡being¡¡priori¡¡from¡¡mere
conceptions¡¡¡a¡¡proof¡¡which¡¡must¡¡be¡¡ontological£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡which¡¡we¡¡feel
ourselves¡¡quite¡¡incapable¡£¡¡With¡¡this¡¡purpose£»¡¡we¡¡reason¡¡from¡¡an¡¡actual
existence¡¡¡an¡¡experience¡¡in¡¡general£»¡¡to¡¡an¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary
condition¡¡of¡¡that¡¡existence¡£¡¡It¡¡is¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case¡¡unnecessary¡¡to
demonstrate¡¡its¡¡possibility¡£¡¡For¡¡after¡¡having¡¡proved¡¡that¡¡it¡¡exists£»
the¡¡question¡¡regarding¡¡its¡¡possibility¡¡is¡¡superfluous¡£¡¡Now£»¡¡when¡¡we
wish¡¡to¡¡define¡¡more¡¡strictly¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡this¡¡necessary¡¡being£»¡¡we¡¡do
not¡¡look¡¡out¡¡for¡¡some¡¡being¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡which¡¡would¡¡enable¡¡us¡¡to
comprehend¡¡the¡¡necessity¡¡of¡¡its¡¡being¡¡¡for¡¡if¡¡we¡¡could¡¡do¡¡this£»¡¡an
empirical¡¡presupposition¡¡would¡¡be¡¡unnecessary£»¡¡no£»¡¡we¡¡try¡¡to
discover¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡negative¡¡condition¡¡£¨conditio¡¡sine¡¡qua¡¡non£©£»
without¡¡which¡¡a¡¡being¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary¡£¡¡Now¡¡this
would¡¡be¡¡perfectly¡¡admissible¡¡in¡¡every¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡reasoning£»¡¡from¡¡a
consequence¡¡to¡¡its¡¡principle£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡the¡¡present¡¡case¡¡it¡¡unfortunately
happens¡¡that¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡of¡¡absolute¡¡necessity¡¡can¡¡be¡¡discovered
in¡¡but¡¡a¡¡single¡¡being£»¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡which¡¡must¡¡consequently
contain¡¡all¡¡that¡¡is¡¡requisite¡¡for¡¡demonstrating¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of
absolute¡¡necessity£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡entitle¡¡me¡¡to¡¡infer¡¡this¡¡absolute
necessity¡¡a¡¡priori¡£¡¡That¡¡is£»¡¡it¡¡must¡¡be¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡reason¡¡conversely£»
and¡¡say£º¡¡The¡¡thing£»¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡highest¡¡reality
belongs£»¡¡is¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary¡£¡¡But¡¡if¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡reason¡¡thus¡¡¡and¡¡I
cannot£»¡¡unless¡¡I¡¡believe¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sufficiency¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ontological
argument¡¡¡I¡¡find¡¡insurmountable¡¡obstacles¡¡in¡¡my¡¡new¡¡path£»¡¡and¡¡am
really¡¡no¡¡farther¡¡than¡¡the¡¡point¡¡from¡¡which¡¡I¡¡set¡¡out¡£¡¡The
conception¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Supreme¡¡Being¡¡satisfies¡¡all¡¡questions¡¡a¡¡priori
regarding¡¡the¡¡internal¡¡determinations¡¡of¡¡a¡¡thing£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡for¡¡this
reason¡¡an¡¡ideal¡¡without¡¡equal¡¡or¡¡parallel£»¡¡the¡¡general¡¡conception¡¡of
it¡¡indicating¡¡it¡¡as¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡an¡¡ens¡¡individuum¡¡among¡¡all
possible¡¡things¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡does¡¡not¡¡satisfy¡¡the¡¡question
regarding¡¡its¡¡existence¡¡¡which¡¡was¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡all¡¡our¡¡inquiries£»
and£»¡¡although¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡necessary¡¡being¡¡were¡¡admitted£»¡¡we
should¡¡find¡¡it¡¡impossible¡¡to¡¡answer¡¡the¡¡question£º¡¡What¡¡of¡¡all¡¡things
in¡¡the¡¡world¡¡must¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡such£¿
¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡certainly¡¡allowable¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡an
all¡sufficient¡¡being¡¡¡a¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡all¡¡possible¡¡effects¡¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose
of¡¡enabling¡¡reason¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡unity¡¡into¡¡its¡¡mode¡¡and¡¡grounds¡¡of
explanation¡¡with¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡phenomena¡£¡¡But¡¡to¡¡assert¡¡that¡¡such¡¡a
being¡¡necessarily¡¡exists£»¡¡is¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡the¡¡modest¡¡enunciation¡¡of¡¡an
admissible¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡boldest¡¡declaration¡¡of¡¡an¡¡apodeictic
certainty£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡cognition¡¡of¡¡that¡¡which¡¡is¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary
must¡¡itself¡¡possess¡¡that¡¡character¡£
¡¡¡¡The¡¡aim¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transcendental¡¡ideal¡¡formed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡mind¡¡is¡¡either
to¡¡discover¡¡a¡¡conception¡¡which¡¡shall¡¡harmonize¡¡with¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of
absolute¡¡necessity£»¡¡or¡¡a¡¡conception¡¡which¡¡shall¡¡contain¡¡that¡¡idea¡£
If¡¡the¡¡one¡¡is¡¡possible£»¡¡so¡¡is¡¡the¡¡other£»¡¡for¡¡reason¡¡recognizes¡¡that
alone¡¡as¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary¡¡which¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡from¡¡its
conception¡£¡¡But¡¡both¡¡attempts¡¡are¡¡equally¡¡beyond¡¡our¡¡power¡¡¡we¡¡find¡¡it
impossible¡¡to¡¡satisfy¡¡the¡¡understanding¡¡upon¡¡this¡¡point£»¡¡and¡¡as
impossible¡¡to¡¡induce¡¡it¡¡to¡¡remain¡¡at¡¡rest¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡this
incapacity¡£
¡¡¡¡Unconditioned¡¡necessity£»¡¡which£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡ultimate¡¡support¡¡and¡¡stay
of¡¡all¡¡existing¡¡things£»¡¡is¡¡an¡¡indispensable¡¡requirement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mind£»
is¡¡an¡¡abyss¡¡on¡¡the¡¡verge¡¡of¡¡which¡¡human¡¡reason¡¡trembles¡¡in¡¡dismay¡£
Even¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡eternity£»¡¡terrible¡¡and¡¡sublime¡¡as¡¡it¡¡is£»¡¡as
depicted¡¡by¡¡Haller£»¡¡does¡¡not¡¡produce¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡mental¡¡vision¡¡such¡¡a
feeling¡¡of¡¡awe¡¡and¡¡terror£»¡¡for£»¡¡although¡¡it¡¡measures¡¡the¡¡duration¡¡of
things£»¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡support¡¡them¡£¡¡We¡¡cannot¡¡bear£»¡¡nor¡¡can¡¡we¡¡rid
ourselves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thought¡¡that¡¡a¡¡being£»¡¡which¡¡we¡¡regard¡¡as¡¡the¡¡greatest
of¡¡all¡¡possible¡¡existences£»¡¡should¡¡say¡¡to¡¡himself£º¡¡I¡¡am¡¡from
eternity¡¡to¡¡eternity£»¡¡beside¡¡me¡¡there¡¡is¡¡nothing£»¡¡except¡¡that¡¡which
exists¡¡by¡¡my¡¡will£»¡¡whence¡¡then¡¡am¡¡I£¿¡¡Here¡¡all¡¡sinks¡¡away¡¡from¡¡under
us£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡greatest£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡smallest£»¡¡perfection£»¡¡hovers¡¡without¡¡stay
or¡¡footing¡¡in¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡speculative¡¡reason£»¡¡which¡¡finds¡¡it¡¡as
easy¡¡to¡¡part¡¡with¡¡the¡¡one¡¡as¡¡with¡¡the¡¡other¡£
¡¡¡¡Many¡¡physical¡¡powers£»¡¡which¡¡evidence¡¡their¡¡existence¡¡by¡¡their
effects£»¡¡are¡¡perfectly¡¡inscrutable¡¡in¡¡their¡¡nature£»¡¡they¡¡elude¡¡all¡¡our
powers¡¡of¡¡observation¡£¡¡The¡¡transcendental¡¡object¡¡which¡¡forms¡¡the¡¡basis
of¡¡phenomena£»¡¡and£»¡¡in¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡it£»¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡our
sensibility¡¡possesses¡¡this¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡that¡¡particular¡¡kind¡¡of
conditions£»¡¡are¡¡and¡¡must¡¡ever¡¡remain¡¡hidden¡¡from¡¡our¡¡mental¡¡vision£»
the¡¡fact¡¡is¡¡there£»¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡of¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡we¡¡cannot¡¡see¡£¡¡But¡¡an
ideal¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡reason¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡termed¡¡mysterious¡¡or¡¡inscrutable£»
because¡¡the¡¡only¡¡credential¡¡of¡¡its¡¡reality¡¡is¡¡the¡¡need¡¡of¡¡it¡¡felt¡¡by
reason£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡giving¡¡completeness¡¡to¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of
synthetical¡¡unity¡£¡¡An¡¡ideal¡¡is¡¡not¡¡even¡¡given¡¡as¡¡a¡¡cogitable¡¡object£»
and¡¡therefore¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡inscrutable£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary£»¡¡it¡¡must£»¡¡as¡¡a
mere¡¡idea£»¡¡be¡¡based¡¡on¡¡the¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡on
this¡¡account¡¡must¡¡be¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡explanation¡¡and¡¡solution¡£¡¡For¡¡the¡¡very
essence¡¡of¡¡reason¡¡consists¡¡in¡¡its¡¡ability¡¡to¡¡give¡¡an¡¡account£»¡¡of¡¡all
our¡¡conceptions£»¡¡opinions£»¡¡and¡¡assertions¡¡¡upon¡¡objective£»¡¡or£»¡¡when
they¡¡happen¡¡to¡¡be¡¡illusory¡¡and¡¡fallacious£»¡¡upon¡¡subjective¡¡grounds¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Detection¡¡and¡¡Explanation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Dialectical¡¡Illusion¡¡in
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡all¡¡Transcendental¡¡Arguments¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Existence¡¡of¡¡a
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Necessary¡¡Being¡£
¡¡¡¡Both¡¡of¡¡the¡¡above¡¡arguments¡¡are¡¡transcendental£»¡¡in¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡they
do¡¡not¡¡proceed¡¡upon¡¡empirical¡¡principles¡£¡¡For£»¡¡although¡¡the
cosmological¡¡argument¡¡professed¡¡to¡¡lay¡¡a¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡experience¡¡for¡¡its
edifice¡¡of¡¡reasoning£»¡¡it¡¡did¡¡not¡¡ground¡¡its¡¡procedure¡¡upon¡¡the
peculiar¡¡constitution¡¡of¡¡experience£»¡¡but¡¡upon¡¡pure¡¡principles¡¡of
reason¡¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡an¡¡existence¡¡given¡¡by¡¡empirical
consciousness£»¡¡utterly¡¡abandoning¡¡its¡¡guidance£»¡¡however£»¡¡for¡¡the
purpose¡¡of¡¡supporting¡¡its¡¡assertions¡¡entirely¡¡upon¡¡pure¡¡conceptions¡£
Now¡¡what¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause£»¡¡in¡¡these¡¡transcendental¡¡arguments£»¡¡of¡¡the
dialectical£»¡¡but¡¡natural£»¡¡illusion£»¡¡which¡¡connects¡¡the¡¡conceptions
of¡¡necessity¡¡and¡¡supreme¡¡reality£»¡¡and¡¡hypostatizes¡¡that¡¡which¡¡cannot
be¡¡anything¡¡but¡¡an¡¡idea£¿¡¡What¡¡is¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡this¡¡unavoidable¡¡step¡¡on
the¡¡part¡¡of¡¡reason£»¡¡of¡¡admitting¡¡that¡¡some¡¡one¡¡among¡¡all¡¡existing
things¡¡must¡¡be¡¡necessary£»¡¡while¡¡it¡¡falls¡¡back¡¡from¡¡the¡¡assertion¡¡of
the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡being¡¡as¡¡from¡¡an¡¡abyss£¿¡¡And¡¡how¡¡does¡¡reason
proceed¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡this¡¡anomaly¡¡to¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡the¡¡wavering
condition¡¡of¡¡a¡¡timid¡¡and¡¡reluctant¡¡approbation¡¡¡always¡¡again
withdrawn¡¡¡arrive¡¡at¡¡a¡¡calm¡¡and¡¡settled¡¡insight¡¡into¡¡its¡¡cause£¿
¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡something¡¡very¡¡remarkable¡¡that£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡supposition¡¡that
something¡¡exists£»¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡avoid¡¡the¡¡inference¡¡that¡¡something¡¡exists
necessarily¡£¡¡Upon¡¡this¡¡perfectly¡¡natural¡¡¡but¡¡not¡¡on¡¡that¡¡account
reliable¡¡¡inference¡¡does¡¡the¡¡cosmological¡¡argument¡¡rest¡£¡¡But£»¡¡let¡¡me
form¡¡any¡¡conception¡¡whatever¡¡of¡¡a¡¡thing£»¡¡I¡¡find¡¡that¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡cogitate
the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thing¡¡as¡¡absolutely¡¡necessary£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡nothing
prevents¡¡me¡¡¡be¡¡the¡¡thing¡¡or¡¡being¡¡what¡¡it¡¡may¡¡¡from¡¡cogitating¡¡its
non¡existence¡£¡¡I¡¡may¡¡thus¡¡be¡¡obliged¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡that¡¡all¡¡existing¡¡things
have¡¡a¡¡necessary¡¡basis£»¡¡while¡¡I¡¡cannot¡¡cogitate¡¡any¡¡single¡¡or
individual¡¡thing¡¡as¡¡necessary¡£¡¡In¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡I¡¡can¡¡never¡¡complete
the¡¡regress¡¡through¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡existence£»¡¡without¡¡