the crisis in russia(俄国危机)-第12章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Conference was right。 For twelve years after that there were no Trades
43
… Page 44…
THE CRISIS IN RUSSIA
Unions Conferences in Russia。 Not until June； 1917； three months after
the March Revolution； was the third Trade Union Conference able to meet。
This Conference reaffirmed the revolutionary character of the Russian
Trades Unions。
At that time the dominant party in the Soviets was that of the
Mensheviks； who were opposed to the formation of a Soviet Government；
and were supporting the provisional Cabinet of Kerensky。 The Trades
Unions were actually at that time more revolutionary than the Soviets。
This third Conference passed several resolutions； which show clearly
enough that the present position of the Unions has not been brought about
by any violence of the Communists from without； but was definitely
promised by tendencies inside the Unions at a time when the Communists
were probably the least authoritative party in Russia。 This Conference of
June； 1917； resolved that the Trades Unions should not only 〃remain
militant class organizations 。 。 。 but 。 。 。 should support the activities of the
Soviets of soldiers and deputies。〃 They thus clearly showed on which
side they stood in the struggle then proceeding。 Nor was this all。 They
also； though the Mensheviks were still the dominant party； resolved on
that system of internal organizations and grouping； which has been
actually realized under the Communists。 I quote again from the
resolution of this Conference：
〃The evolution of the economic struggle demands from the workers
such forms of professional organization as； basing themselves on the
connection between various groups of workers in the process of
production； should unite within a general organization； and under general
leadership； as large masses of workers as possible occupied in enterprises
of the same kind； or in similar professions。 With this object the workers
should organize themselves professionally； not by shops or trades； but by
productions； so that all the workers of a given enterprise should belong to
one Union； even if they belong to different professions and even different
productions。〃 That which was then no more than a design is now an
accurate description of Trades Union organization in Russia。 Further；
much that at present surprises the foreign inquirer was planned and
considered desirable then； before the Communists had won a majority
44
… Page 45…
THE CRISIS IN RUSSIA
either in the Unions or in the Soviet。 Thus this same third Conference
resolved that 〃in the interests of greater efficiency and success in the
economic struggle； a professional organization should be built on the
principle of democratic centralism； assuring to every member a share in
the affairs of the organization and； at the same time； obtaining unity in the
leadership of the struggle。〃 Finally；
〃Unity in the direction （leadership） of the economic struggle demands
unity in the exchequer of the Trades Unions。〃
The point that I wish to make in thus illustrating the pre…Communist
tendencies of the Russian Trades Unions is not simply that if their present
position is undesirable they have only themselves to thank for it； but that
in Russia the Trades Union movement before the October Revolution was
working in the direction of such a revolution； that the events of October
represented something like a Trade Union victory； so that the present
position of the Unions as part of the organization defending that victory； as
part of the system of government set up by that revolution； is logical and
was to be expected。 I have illustrated this from resolutions； because
these give statements in words easily comparable with what
has come to pass。 It would be equally easy to point to deeds instead
of words if we need more forcible though less accurate illustrations。
Thus； at the time of the Moscow Congress the Soviets； then
Mensheviks； who were represented at the Congress （the object of the
Congress was to whip up support for the Coalition Government） were
against strikes of protest。 The Trades Unions took a point of view nearer
that of the Bolsheviks； and the strikes in Moscow took place in spite of the
Soviets。 After the Kornilov affair； when the Mensheviks were still
struggling for coalition with the bourgeois parties； the Trades Unions quite
definitely took the Bolshevik standpoint。 At the so…called Democratic
Conference； intended as a sort of life belt for the sinking Provisional
Government； only eight of the Trades Union delegates voted for a
continuance of the coalition； whereas seventy three voted against。
This consciously revolutionary character throughout their much
shorter existence has distinguished Russian from； for example； English
Trades Unions。 It has set their course for them。
45
… Page 46…
THE CRISIS IN RUSSIA
In October； 1917； they got the revolution for which they had been
asking since March。 Since then； one Congress after another has
illustrated the natural and inevitable development of Trades Unions inside
a revolutionary State which； like most if not all revolutionary States； is
attacked simultaneously by hostile armies from without and by economic
paralysis from within。 The excited and lighthearted Trades Unionists of
three years ago； who believed that the mere decreeing of 〃workers'
control〃 would bring all difficulties automatically to an end； are now
unrecognizable。 We have seen illusion after illusion scraped from them
by the pumice…stone of experience； while the appalling state of the
industries which they now largely control； and the ruin of the country in
which they attained that control； have forced them to alter their immediate
aims to meet immediate dangers； and have accelerated the process of
adaptation made inevitable by their victory。
The process of adaptation has had the natural result of producing new
internal cleavages。 Change after change in their programme and theory
of the Russian Trades Unionists has been due to the pressure of life itself；
to the urgency of struggling against the worsening of conditions already
almost unbearable。 It is perfectly natural that those Unions which hold
back from adaptation and resent the changes are precisely those which；
like that of the printers； are not intimately concerned in any productive
process； are consequently outside the central struggle； and； while feeling
the discomforts of change； do not feel its need。
The opposition inside the productive Trades Unions is of two kinds。
There is the opposition； which is of merely psychological interest； of old
Trades Union leaders who have always thought of themselves as in
opposition to the Government； and feel themselves like watches without
mainsprings in their new role of Government supporters。 These are men in
whom a natural intellectual stiffness makes difficult the complete change
of front which was the logical result of the revolution for which they had
been working。 But beside that there is a much more interesting opposition
based on political considerations。 The Menshevik standpoint is one of
disbelief in the permanence of the revolution； or rather in the permanence
46
… Page 47…
THE CRISIS IN RUSSIA
of the victory of the town workers。 They point to the divergence in
interests between the town and country populations； and are convinced
that sooner or later the peasants will alter the government to suit
themselves； when； once more； it will be a government against which the
town workers will have to defend their interests。 The Mensheviks object
to the identification of the Trades Unions with the Government apparatus
on the ground that when this change； which they expect comes about； the
Trade Union movement will be so far emasculated as to be incapable of
defending the town workers against the peasants who will then be the
ruling class。 Thus they attack the present Trades Union leaders for being
directly influenced by the Government in fixing the rate of wages； on the
ground that this establishes a precedent from which； when the change
comes； it will be difficult to break away。 The Communists answer them
by insisting that it is to everybody's interest to pull Russia through the
crisis； and that if the Trades Unions were for such academic reasons to
insist on their complete independence instead of in every possible way
collaborating with the Government； they would be not only increasing the
difficulties of the revolution in its economic crisis； but actually hastening
that change which the Mensheviks； though they regard it as inevitable；
cannot be supposed to desire。 This Menshevik opposition is strongest in
the Ukraine。 Its strength may be judged from the figures of the Congress
in Moscow this spring when； of 1；300 delegates； over 1；000 were
Communists or sympathizers with them； 63 were Mensheviks and 200
were non…party； the bulk of whom； I fancy； on this point would agree with
the Mensheviks。
But apart from opposition to the 〃stratification〃 of the Trades
Unions； the
