phenomenology of mind-及116嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
previously multiform circle of gods�察�with its wavering and unsteady characteristics�察�confines itself to
these powers�察�which owing to this feature are brought closer to individuality proper。 For the
previous dispersion of the whole into manifold abstract forces�察�which appear hypostatized�察�is the
dissolution of the subject which comprehends them merely as moments in its self�察�and individuality
is therefore only the superficial form of these entities。 Conversely�察�a further distinction of characters
than that just named is to be reckoned as contingent and inherently external personality。
At the same time�察�the essential nature ��in the case of ethical substance�А�gets divided in its form�察�i。e。
with respect to knowledge。 Spirit when acting�察�appears�察�qua consciousness�察�over against the
object on which its activity is directed�察�and which�察�in consequence�察�is determined as the negative of
the knowing agent。 The agent finds himself thereby in the opposition of knowing and not knowing。
He takes his purpose from his own character�察�and knows it to be essential ethical fact�察�but owing
to the determinateness of his character�察�he knows merely the one power of substance�察�the other
remains for him concealed and out of sight。 The present reality�察�therefore�察�is one thing in itself�察�and
another for consciousness。 The higher and lower right come to signify in this connexion the power
that knows and reveals itself to consciousness�察�and the power concealing itself and lurking in the
background。 The one is the aspect of light�察�the god of the Oracle�察�who as regards its natural
aspect ��Light�А�has sprung from the all´illuminating Sun�察�knows all and reveals all�察�Ph��bus and Zeus��
who is his Father。 But the commands of this truth´speaking god�察�and his proclamations of what is��
are really deceptive and fallacious。 For this knowledge is�察�in its very principle�察�directly not
knowledge�察�because consciousness in acting is inherently this opposition。 He�撮�4�� who had the
power to unlock the riddle of the sphinx�察�and he too who trusted with childlike confidence�撮�5�� are��
therefore�察�both sent to destruction through what the god reveals to them。 The priestess�察�through
whose mouth the beautiful god speaks�撮�6�� is in nothing different from the equivocal sisters of fate�撮�7��
who drive their victim to crime by their promises�察�and who�察�by the double´tongued�察�equivocal
character of what they gave out as a certainty�察�deceive the King when he relies upon the manifest
and obvious meaning of what they say。 There is a type of consciousness that is purer than the
latter��8�� which believes in witches�察�and more sober�察�more thorough�察�and more solid than the former
which puts its trust in the priestess and the beautiful god。 This type of consciousness�撮�9�� therefore��
lets his revenge tarry for the revelation which the spirit of his father makes regarding the crime that
did him to death�察�and institutes other proofs in addition ! for the reason that the spirit giving the
revelation might possibly be the devil。
This mistrust has good grounds�察�because the knowing consciousness takes its stand on the
opposition between certainty of itself on the one hand�察�and the objective essential reality on the
other。 Ethical rightness�察�which insists that actuality is nothing per se in opposition to absolute law��
finds out that its knowledge is onesided�察�its law merely a law of its own character�察�and that it has
laid hold of merely one of the powers of the substance。 The act itself is this inversion of what is
known into its opposite�察�into objective existence�察�turns round what is right from the point of view
of character and knowledge into the right of the very opposite with which the former is bound up
in the essential nature of the substance ! turns it into the ;Furies; who embody the right of the
other power and character awakened into hostility。 The lower right sits with Zeus enthroned�察�and
enjoys equal respect and homage with the god revealed and knowing。
To these three supernatural Beings the world of the gods of the chorus is limited and restricted by
the acting individuality。 The one is the substance�察�the power presiding over the hearth and home
and the spirit worshipped by the family�察�as well as the universal power pervading state and
government。 Since this distinction belongs to the substance as such�察�it is�察�when dramatically
presented�察�not individualized in two distinct shapes ��of the substance�В察�but has in actual reality the
two persons of its characters。 On the other hand�察�the distinction between knowing and not
knowing falls within each of the actual self´consciousnesses�察�and only in abstraction�察�in the element
of universality�察�does it get divided into two individual shapes。 For the self of the hero only exists as
a whole consciousness�察�and hence includes essentially the whole of the distinction belonging to the
form�察�but its substance is determinate�察�and only one side of the content distinguished belongs to
him。 Hence the two sides of consciousness�察�which have m concrete reality no separate individuality
peculiarly their own�察�receive�察�when ideally represented�察�each its own particular form�此�the one that
of the god revealed�察�the other that of the Furies keeping themselves concealed。 In part both enjoy
equal honour�察�while again�察�the form assumed by the substance�察�Zeus�察�is the necessity of the relation
of the two to one another。 The substance is the relation ��1�А�that knowledge is for itself�察�but finds its
truth in what is simple�察。�2�А�that the distinction�察�through and in which actual consciousness exists��
has its basis in that inner being which destroys it�察。�3�А�that the clear conscious assurance of certainty
has its confirmation in forgetfulness。
Consciousness disclosed this opposition by action�察�through doing something。 Acting in accordance
with the knowledge revealed�察�it�察�finds out the deceptiveness of that knowledge�察�and being
committed�察�as regards its inner nature。�察�to one of the attributes of substance�察�it did violence to the
other and thereby gave the latter right as against itself。 When following that god who knows and
reveals himself�察�it really seized hold of what is not revealed�察�and pays the penalty for having trusted
the knowledge�察�whose equivocal character ��since this is its very nature�� it also had to discover��
and an admonition thereanent to be given。 The frenzy of the priestess�察�the inhuman shape of the
witches�察�the voices of trees and birds�察�dreams�察�and so on�察�are not ways in which truth appears��
they are admonitory signs of deception�察�of want of judgment�察�of the individual and accidental
character of knowledge。 Or�察�what comes to the same thing�察�the opposite power�察�which
consciousness has violated�察�is present as express law and authentic right�察�whether law of the family
or law of the state�察�while consciousness�察�on the other hand�察�pursued its own proper knowledge��
and hid from itself what was revealed。
The truth�察�however�察�of the opposing powers of content and consciousness is the final result�察�that
both are equally right�察�and�察�hence�察�in their opposition ��which comes about through action�� are
equally wrong。 The process of action proves their unity in the mutual overthrow of both powers
and both self´conscious characters。 The reconciliation of the opposition with itself is the Lethe of
the nether world in the form of Death´or the Lethe of the upper world in the form of absolution��
not from guilt ��for consciousness cannot deny its guilt�察�because the act was done���察�but from the
crime�察�and in the form of the peace of soul which atones for the crime。 Both are forgetfulness�察�the
disappearance of the reality and action of the powers of the substance�察�of their component
individualities�察�and of the powers of the abstract thought of good and evil。 For none of them by
itself is the real essence�此�this consists in the undisturbed calm of the whole within itself�察�the
immovable unity of Fate�察�the quiescent existence ��and hence want of activity and vitality�� of the
family and government�察�and the equal honour and consequent indifferent unreality of Apollo and
the Furies�察�and the return of their spiritual life and activity into Zeus solely and simply。
This destiny completes the depopulation of Heaven´of that unthinking blending of individuality and。
ultimate Being ! a blending whereby the action of this absolute Being appears as something
incoherent�察�contingent�察�unworthy of itself�察�for individuality�察�when attaching in a merely superficial
way to absolute Being�察�is unessential。 The expulsion of such unreal insubstantial ideas�察�which was
demanded by the philosophers of antiquity�察�thus already has its beginning in tragedy in general��
through the fact that the division of the substance is controlled by the notion�察�and hence
individuality is the essential individuality�察�and the specific determinations are absolute characters。
The self´consciousness represented in tragedy knows and acknowledges on that account only one
highest power�察�Zeus。 This Zeus is known and acknowledged only as the power of the state or of
the hearth and home�察�and�察�in the opposition belonging to knowledge�察�merely as the Father of the
knowledge of the particular�察 � a knowledge assuming a figure in the drama�此 � and again as the
Zeus of the oath and of the Furies�察�the Zeus of what is universal�察�of the inner being dwelling in
concealment。 The further moments taken from the notion ��Begriff�� and dispersed in the form of
ideal presentation ��Vorstellung���察�moments which the chorus permits to hold good one after the
other�察�are�察�on the other hand�察�not the ;pathos; of the hero�察�they sink to the level of passions in the
hero ! to the level of accidental�察�insubstantial moments�察�which the impersonal chorus no doubt
praises�察�but which are not capable of constituting the character of heroes�察�nor of being expressed
and revered by them as their real nature。
But�察�further�察�the persons of the divine Being itself�察�as well as the characters of its substance��
coalesce into the simplicity of what is devoid of consciousness。 This necessity has�察�in contrast to
self´consciousness�察�the characteristic of being the negative power of all the shapes that appear�察�a
power in which they do not recognize themselves�察�but perish therein。 The self appears as merely
allotted amongst the different characters�察�and not as the mediating factor of the process。 But
self´consciousness�察�the simple certainty of self�察�is in point of fact the negative power�察�the unity of
Zeus�察�the unity of the substantial essence and abstract necessity�察�it is the spiritual unity into which
everything returns。 Because actual self´consciousness is still distinguished from the substance and
fate�察�it is partly the chorus�察�or rather the crowd looking on�察�whom this movement of the divine life
fills with fear as being something alien and strange�察�or in whom this movement�察�as something
closely touching themselves�察�produces merely the emotion of passive pity。 Partly again�察�so far as
consciousness co´operates and belongs to the various characters�察�this alliance is of an external
kind�察�is a hypocrisy ! because the true union�察�that of self�察�fate�察�and substance�察�is not yet present。
The hero�察�who appears bef ore the onlookers�察�breaks up into his mask and the actor�察�into the
person of the play and the actua