°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > abraham lincoln and the union >

µÚ20ÕÂ

abraham lincoln and the union-µÚ20ÕÂ

С˵£º abraham lincoln and the union ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡




Relations¡¡with¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡now¡¡became¡¡a¡¡burning¡¡issue¡¡in¡¡English¡¡politics¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡were¡¡three¡¡distinct¡¡groups¡¡in¡¡Parliament¡£¡¡The¡¡representatives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡aristocracy£»¡¡whether¡¡Liberals¡¡or¡¡Conservatives£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡main¡¡sympathized¡¡with¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡¡¡So¡¡did¡¡most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡large¡¡manufacturers¡¡whose¡¡business¡¡interests¡¡were¡¡affected¡¡by¡¡cotton¡£¡¡¡¡Great¡¡bitterness¡¡grew¡¡up¡¡among¡¡the¡¡Northerners¡¡against¡¡both¡¡these¡¡groups£»¡¡partly¡¡because¡¡in¡¡the¡¡past¡¡many¡¡of¡¡their¡¡members¡¡had¡¡condemned¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡had¡¡said¡¡scornful¡¡things¡¡about¡¡America¡¡for¡¡tolerating¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡To¡¡these¡¡Northerners¡¡the¡¡Englishmen¡¡replied¡¡that¡¡Lincoln¡¡himself¡¡had¡¡declared¡¡the¡¡war¡¡was¡¡not¡¡over¡¡slavery£»¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡an¡¡ordinary¡¡civil¡¡war¡¡not¡¡involving¡¡moral¡¡issues¡£¡¡¡¡Nevertheless£»¡¡the¡¡third¡¡Parliamentary¡¡group¡¡insisted¡¡that¡¡the¡¡American¡¡war£»¡¡no¡¡matter¡¡what¡¡the¡¡motives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡participants£»¡¡would£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡event¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Northern¡¡victory£»¡¡bring¡¡about¡¡the¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡whereas£»¡¡if¡¡the¡¡South¡¡won£»¡¡the¡¡result¡¡would¡¡be¡¡the¡¡perpetuation¡¡of¡¡slavery¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡third¡¡group£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡threw¡¡all¡¡its¡¡weight¡¡on¡¡the¡¡side¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡this¡¡group¡¡Lincoln¡¡recognized¡¡his¡¡allies£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡cause¡¡he¡¡identified¡¡with¡¡his¡¡own¡¡in¡¡his¡¡letter¡¡to¡¡English¡¡workmen¡¡which¡¡was¡¡quoted¡¡in¡¡the¡¡previous¡¡chapter¡£¡¡¡¡Their¡¡leaders¡¡in¡¡Parliament¡¡were¡¡Richard¡¡Cobden£»¡¡W¡£¡¡E¡£¡¡Forster£»¡¡and¡¡John¡¡Bright¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡these¡¡groups¡¡were¡¡represented¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Liberal¡¡party£»¡¡which£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡moment£»¡¡was¡¡in¡¡power¡£

In¡¡the¡¡Cabinet¡¡itself¡¡there¡¡was¡¡a¡¡¡¨Northern¡¨¡¡and¡¡a¡¡¡¨Southern¡¨¡¡faction¡£¡¡¡¡Then£»¡¡too£»¡¡there¡¡were¡¡some¡¡who¡¡sympathized¡¡with¡¡the¡¡North¡¡but¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡its¡¡cause¡¡was¡¡hopelessso¡¡little¡¡did¡¡they¡¡understand¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡strength¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡sectionsand¡¡who¡¡felt¡¡that¡¡the¡¡war¡¡was¡¡a¡¡terrible¡¡proof¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uselessness¡¡of¡¡mere¡¡suffering¡£¡¡¡¡Gladstone£»¡¡in¡¡later¡¡days£»¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡be¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡as¡¡having¡¡been¡¡one¡¡of¡¡these£»¡¡though¡¡at¡¡the¡¡time£»¡¡a¡¡famous¡¡utterance¡¡of¡¡his¡¡was¡¡construed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡North¡¡as¡¡a¡¡declaration¡¡of¡¡hostility¡£¡¡To¡¡a¡¡great¡¡audience¡¡at¡¡Newcastle¡¡he¡¡said¡¡in¡¡October£»¡¡1862£º¡¡¡¨We¡¡may¡¡have¡¡our¡¡own¡¡opinions¡¡about¡¡slavery£»¡¡we¡¡may¡¡be¡¡for¡¡or¡¡against¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡but¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡that¡¡Jefferson¡¡Davis¡¡and¡¡other¡¡leaders¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡¡have¡¡made¡¡an¡¡army£»¡¡they¡¡are¡¡making£»¡¡it¡¡appears£»¡¡a¡¡navy£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡have¡¡made£»¡¡what¡¡is¡¡more¡¡than¡¡eitherthey¡¡have¡¡made¡¡a¡¡nation¡£¡¨

The¡¡Prime¡¡Minister£»¡¡Lord¡¡Palmerston£»¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡intervene¡¡in¡¡the¡¡American¡¡war¡¡and¡¡bring¡¡about¡¡an¡¡amicable¡¡separation¡¡into¡¡two¡¡countries£»¡¡and¡¡so£»¡¡apparently£»¡¡did¡¡the¡¡Foreign¡¡Secretary£»¡¡Lord¡¡John¡¡Russell¡£¡¡¡¡Recently£»¡¡the¡¡American¡¡minister¡¡had¡¡vainly¡¡protested¡¡against¡¡the¡¡sailing¡¡of¡¡a¡¡ship¡¡known¡¡as¡¡290¡¡which¡¡was¡¡being¡¡equipped¡¡at¡¡Liverpool¡¡presumably¡¡for¡¡the¡¡service¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Confederacy£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡became¡¡the¡¡famous¡¡Alabama¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡two¡¡years¡¡it¡¡roved¡¡the¡¡ocean¡¡destroying¡¡Northern¡¡commerce£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡until¡¡it¡¡was¡¡sunk¡¡at¡¡last¡¡in¡¡a¡¡battle¡¡with¡¡the¡¡U¡£¡¡S¡£¡¡S¡£¡¡Kearsarge¡¡did¡¡all¡¡the¡¡maritime¡¡interests¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North¡¡breathe¡¡again¡¡freely¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡time¡¡and¡¡as¡¡a¡¡result¡¡of¡¡arbitration£»¡¡England¡¡paid¡¡for¡¡the¡¡ships¡¡sunk¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Alabama¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡in¡¡1862£»¡¡the¡¡protests¡¡of¡¡the¡¡American¡¡minister¡¡fell¡¡on¡¡deaf¡¡ears¡£

It¡¡must¡¡be¡¡added¡¡that¡¡the¡¡sailing¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Alabama¡¡from¡¡Liverpool¡¡was¡¡due¡¡probably¡¡to¡¡the¡¡carelessness¡¡of¡¡British¡¡officials¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡to¡¡deliberate¡¡purpose¡£¡¡¡¡And¡¡yet¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡is¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡about¡¡the¡¡first¡¡of¡¡October£»¡¡1862£»¡¡the¡¡British¡¡ministry¡¡was¡¡on¡¡the¡¡verge¡¡of¡¡intervening¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡recognition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡independence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡confederacy¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡chief¡¡motive¡¡pressing¡¡them¡¡forward¡¡was¡¡the¡¡distress¡¡in¡¡England¡¡caused¡¡by¡¡the¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡cotton¡¡which¡¡resulted¡¡from¡¡the¡¡American¡¡blockade¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡1860£»¡¡the¡¡South¡¡had¡¡exported¡¡615£»000¡¡bales£»¡¡in¡¡1861£»¡¡only¡¡10£»127¡¡bales¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡1862¡¡half¡¡the¡¡spindles¡¡of¡¡Manchester¡¡were¡¡idle£»¡¡the¡¡workmen¡¡were¡¡out¡¡of¡¡employment£»¡¡the¡¡owners¡¡were¡¡without¡¡dividends¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡chiefly¡¡by¡¡these¡¡manufacturing¡¡capitalists¡¡that¡¡pressure¡¡was¡¡put¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡ministry£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡was¡¡in¡¡the¡¡manufacturing¡¡district¡¡that¡¡Gladstone£»¡¡thinking¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡was¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡intervene£»¡¡made¡¡his¡¡allusion¡¡to¡¡the¡¡South¡¡as¡¡a¡¡nation¡£

Meanwhile¡¡the¡¡Emperor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡French¡¡was¡¡considering¡¡a¡¡proposal¡¡to¡¡England¡¡and¡¡Russia¡¡to¡¡join¡¡with¡¡him¡¡in¡¡mediation¡¡between¡¡the¡¡American¡¡belligerents¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡October¡¡28£»¡¡1862£»¡¡Napoleon¡¡III¡¡gave¡¡audience¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Confederate¡¡envoy¡¡at¡¡Paris£»¡¡discussed¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡cause¡¡in¡¡the¡¡most¡¡friendly¡¡manner£»¡¡questioned¡¡him¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Maryland¡¡campaign£»¡¡plainly¡¡indicated¡¡his¡¡purpose¡¡to¡¡attempt¡¡intervention£»¡¡and¡¡at¡¡parting¡¡cordially¡¡shook¡¡hands¡¡with¡¡him¡£¡¡Within¡¡a¡¡few¡¡days¡¡the¡¡Emperor¡¡made¡¡good¡¡his¡¡implied¡¡promise¡£

The¡¡month¡¡of¡¡November£»¡¡1862£»¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡turningpoints¡¡in¡¡American¡¡foreign¡¡relations¡£¡¡¡¡Both¡¡Russia¡¡and¡¡England¡¡rejected¡¡France's¡¡proposal¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡motive¡¡usually¡¡assigned¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Emperor¡¡Alexander¡¡is¡¡his¡¡hatred¡¡of¡¡everything¡¡associated¡¡with¡¡slavery¡£¡¡His¡¡own¡¡most¡¡famous¡¡action¡¡was¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Russian¡¡serfs¡£¡¡The¡¡motives¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡ministry£»¡¡however£»¡¡appear¡¡more¡¡problematical¡£

Mr¡£¡¡Rhodes¡¡thinks¡¡he¡¡can¡¡discern¡¡evidence¡¡that¡¡Adams¡¡communicated¡¡indirectly¡¡to¡¡Palmerston¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡a¡¡dispatch¡¡from¡¡Seward¡¡which¡¡indicated¡¡that¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡would¡¡accept¡¡war¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡mediation¡£¡¡¡¡Palmerston¡¡had¡¡kept¡¡his¡¡eyes¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Maryland¡¡campaign£»¡¡and¡¡Lee's¡¡withdrawal¡¡did¡¡not¡¡increase¡¡his¡¡confidence¡¡in¡¡the¡¡strength¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South¡£¡¡¡¡Lord¡¡Russell£»¡¡two¡¡months¡¡previous£»¡¡had¡¡flatly¡¡told¡¡the¡¡Confederate¡¡envoy¡¡at¡¡London¡¡that¡¡the¡¡South¡¡need¡¡not¡¡hope¡¡for¡¡recognition¡¡unless¡¡it¡¡could¡¡establish¡¡itself¡¡without¡¡aid£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡fluctuating¡¡events¡¡of¡¡the¡¡war£»¡¡the¡¡alternation¡¡of¡¡defeat¡¡and¡¡victory£»¡¨¡¡composed¡¡such¡¡a¡¡contradictory¡¡situation¡¡that¡¡¡¨Her¡¡Majesty's¡¡Government¡¡are¡¡still¡¡determined¡¡to¡¡wait¡£¡¨

Perhaps¡¡the¡¡veiled¡¡American¡¡warningassuming¡¡it¡¡was¡¡conveyed¡¡to¡¡Palmerston£»¡¡which¡¡seems¡¡highly¡¡probablewas¡¡not¡¡the¡¡only¡¡diplomatic¡¡innuendo¡¡of¡¡the¡¡autumn¡¡of¡¡1862¡¡that¡¡has¡¡escaped¡¡the¡¡pages¡¡of¡¡history¡£¡¡¡¡Slidell¡¡at¡¡Paris£»¡¡putting¡¡together¡¡the¡¡statements¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Ambassador¡¡and¡¡those¡¡of¡¡the¡¡French¡¡Minister¡¡of¡¡Foreign¡¡Affairs£»¡¡found¡¡in¡¡them¡¡contradictions¡¡as¡¡to¡¡what¡¡was¡¡going¡¡on¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡governments¡¡in¡¡relation¡¡to¡¡America¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡took¡¡a¡¡hand¡¡by¡¡attempting¡¡to¡¡inspire¡¡M¡£¡¡Drouyn¡¡de¡¡L'huys¡¡with¡¡distrust¡¡of¡¡England£»¡¡telling¡¡him¡¡he¡¡¡¨HAD¡¡SEEN¡£¡£¡£a¡¡letter¡¡from¡¡a¡¡leading¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Cabinet¡£¡£¡£in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡very¡¡plainly¡¡insinuated¡¡that¡¡France¡¡was¡¡playing¡¡an¡¡unfair¡¡game£»¡¨¡¡trying¡¡to¡¡use¡¡England¡¡as¡¡Napoleon's¡¡catspaw¡£¡¡¡¡Among¡¡the¡¡many¡¡motives¡¡that¡¡may¡¡well¡¡have¡¡animated¡¡the¡¡Palmerston¡¡Government¡¡in¡¡its¡¡waiting¡¡policy£»¡¡a¡¡distrust¡¡of¡¡Napoleon¡¡deserves¡¡to¡¡be¡¡considered¡£

It¡¡is¡¡scarcely¡¡rash£»¡¡however£»¡¡to¡¡find¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡motive¡¡in¡¡home¡¡politics¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡impetuous¡¡Gladstone¡¡at¡¡Newcastle¡¡lost¡¡his¡¡head¡¡and¡¡spoke¡¡too¡¡soon¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡most¡¡serious¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡his¡¡premature¡¡utterance¡¡was¡¡the¡¡prompt¡¡reaction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨Northern¡¡party¡¨¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Cabinet¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡country¡£¡¡¡¡Whatever¡¡Palmerston's¡¡secret¡¡desires¡¡were£»¡¡he¡¡was¡¡not¡¡prepared¡¡to¡¡take¡¡the¡¡high¡¡hand£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡therefore¡¡permitted¡¡other¡¡members¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Cabinet¡¡to¡¡state¡¡in¡¡public¡¡that¡¡Gladstone¡¡had¡¡been¡¡misunderstood¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡an¡¡interview¡¡with¡¡Adams£»¡¡Lord¡¡Russell£»¡¡¡¨whilst¡¡endeavoring¡¡to¡¡excuse¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Gladstone£»¡¨¡¡assured¡¡him¡¡that¡¡¡¨the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡was¡¡to¡¡adhere¡¡to¡¡a¡¡strict¡¡neutrality¡¡and¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡struggle¡¡to¡¡settle¡¡itself¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡last¡¡analysis£»¡¡the¡¡Northern¡¡party¡¡in¡¡England¡¡was¡¡gaining¡¡ground¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡news¡¡from¡¡America£»¡¡possibly£»¡¡and¡¡Gladstone's¡¡rashness£»¡¡certainly£»¡¡roused¡¡it¡¡to¡¡increased¡¡activity¡£¡¡¡¡Palmerston£»¡¡whose¡¡tenure¡¡of¡¡power¡¡was¡¡none¡¡too¡¡secure£»¡¡dared¡¡not¡¡risk¡¡a¡¡break¡¡that¡¡might¡¡carry¡¡the¡¡disaffected¡¡into¡¡the¡¡ranks¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Opposition¡£

From¡¡this¡¡time¡¡forward¡¡the¡¡North¡¡rapidly¡¡grew¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡in¡¡British¡¡public¡¡opinion£»¡¡and¡¡its¡¡influence¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡speedily¡¡increased¡£

Says¡¡Lord¡¡Charnwood¡¡in¡¡his¡¡recent¡¡life¡¡of¡¡Lincoln£º¡¡¡¨The¡¡battle¡¡of¡¡Antietam¡¡was¡¡followed¡¡within¡¡five¡¡days¡¡by¡¡an¡¡event¡¡which¡¡made¡¡it¡¡impossible¡¡for¡¡any¡¡government¡¡of¡¡this¡¡country¡¡to¡¡take¡¡action¡¡unfriendly¡¡to¡¡the¡¡North¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡He¡¡refers¡¡of¡¡course¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Emancipation¡¡Proclamation£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡issued¡¡on¡¡September¡¡23£»¡¡1862¡£¡¡¡¡Lord¡¡Charnwood's¡¡remark¡¡may¡¡be¡¡too¡¡dramatic¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡there¡¡can¡¡be¡¡no¡¡doubt¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Emancipation¡¡Proclamation¡¡was¡¡the¡¡turning¡­point¡¡in¡¡Lincoln's¡¡foreign¡¡policy£»¡¡and¡¡because¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡his¡¡friends¡¡in¡¡England¡¡eventually¡¡forced¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡to¡¡play¡¡into¡¡his¡¡hands£»¡¡and¡¡so¡¡frustrated¡¡Napoleon's¡¡scheme¡¡for¡¡intervention¡£¡¡Consequently¡¡Lincoln¡¡was¡¡able¡¡to¡¡maintain¡¡the¡¡blockade¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡South¡¡was¡¡strangled¡£¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡at¡¡bottom£»¡¡the¡¡crucial¡¡matter¡¡was¡¡Emancipation¡£

Lincoln's¡¡policy¡¡with¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡passed¡¡through¡¡three¡¡distinct¡¡stages¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡he¡¡proposed£»¡¡at¡¡first£»¡¡to¡¡pledge¡¡the¡¡Government¡¡not¡¡to¡¡interfere¡¡with¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡States¡¡where¡¡it¡¡then¡¡existed¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡was¡¡his¡¡maximum¡¡of¡¡compromise¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡would¡¡not¡¡agree¡¡to¡¡permitting¡¡its¡¡extension¡¡into¡¡new¡¡territory¡£¡¡He¡¡maintained¡¡this¡¡position¡¡through¡¡1861£»¡¡when¡¡it¡¡was¡¡made¡¡an¡¡accusation¡¡against¡¡him¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Abolitionists¡¡and¡¡contributed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡ebb¡¡of¡¡his¡¡popularity¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡also¡¡played¡¡a¡¡great¡¡part¡¡in¡¡the¡¡episode¡¡of¡¡Fremont¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡a¡¡crucial¡¡moment¡¡in¡¡Fremont's¡¡career£»¡¡when¡¡his¡¡hold¡¡upon¡¡popularity¡¡seemed¡¡precarious£»¡¡he¡¡set¡¡at¡¡naught¡¡the¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡President¡¡and¡¡issued¡¡an¡¡order¡¡£¨August¡¡30£»¡¡1861£©£»¡¡which¡¡confiscated¡¡all¡¡property¡¡and¡¡slaves¡¡of¡¡those¡¡who¡¡were¡¡in¡¡arms¡¡against¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡or¡¡actively¡¡aiding¡¡the¡¡enemy£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡created¡¡a¡¡¡¨bureau¡¡of¡¡abolition¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡Whether¡¡Fremont¡¡was¡¡acting¡¡from¡¡conviction¡¡or¡¡¡¨playing¡¡politics¡¨¡¡may¡¡be¡¡left¡¡to¡¡his¡¡biographers¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡a¡¡most¡¡tactful¡¡letter¡¡Lincoln¡¡asked¡¡him¡¡to¡¡modify¡¡the¡¡order¡¡so¡¡as¡¡to¡¡conform¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Confiscation¡¡Act¡¡of¡¡Congress£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡Fremont¡¡proved¡¡obdurate£»¡¡Lincoln¡¡ordered¡¡him¡¡to¡¡do¡¡so¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡outcry¡¡against¡¡Lincoln¡¡when¡¡Fremont¡¡was¡¡at¡¡last¡¡removed£»¡¡the¡¡Abolitionists¡¡rang¡¡the¡¡changes¡¡on¡¡this¡¡reversal¡¡of¡¡his¡¡policy¡¡of¡¡military¡¡abolition¡£

Another¡¡Federal¡¡General£»¡¡Benjamin¡¡F¡£¡¡Butler£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡1861£»¡¡also¡¡raised¡¡the¡¡issue£»¡¡though¡¡not¡¡in¡¡the¡¡bold¡¡fashion¡¡of¡¡Fremont¡£¡¡Runaway¡¡slaves¡¡came¡¡to¡¡his¡¡camp¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Virginia¡¡coast£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡surrender¡¡them¡¡to¡¡the¡¡owners¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡took¡¡the¡¡ground¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡had¡¡probably¡¡been¡¡used¡¡in¡¡building¡¡Confederate¡¡fortifications£»¡¡they¡¡might¡¡be¡¡considered¡¡contraband¡¡of¡¡war¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡sustained¡¡by¡¡Congress£»¡¡which¡¡passed¡¡what¡¡is¡¡commonly¡¡called¡¡the¡¡First¡¡Confiscation¡¡Act¡¡providing¡¡that¡¡slaves¡¡used¡¡by¡¡Confederate¡¡armies¡¡in¡¡military¡¡labor¡¡should£»¡¡if¡¡captured£»¡¡be¡¡¡¨forfeited¡¨which¡¡of¡¡course¡¡meant¡¡that¡¡they¡¡should¡¡be¡¡set¡¡free¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡this¡¡did¡¡not¡¡settle¡¡what¡¡should¡¡be¡¡done¡¡with¡¡runaways¡¡whose¡¡masters£»¡¡though¡¡residents¡¡of¡¡seceded¡¡States£»¡¡were¡¡loyal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡War¡¡Department¡¡decided¡¡that¡¡they¡¡should¡¡be¡¡held¡¡until¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡war£»¡¡when¡¡probably¡¡there¡¡would¡¡be¡¡made¡¡¡¨just¡¡compensation¡¡to¡¡loyal¡¡masters¡£¡¨

This¡¡first¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡Lincoln's¡¡policy¡¡rested¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡hope¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Union¡¡might¡¡be¡¡restored¡¡without¡¡prolonged¡¡war¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡abandoned¡¡this¡¡hope¡¡about¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡year¡£¡¡¡¡Thereupon£»¡¡his¡¡policy¡¡entered¡¡its¡¡second¡¡stage¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡spring¡¡of¡¡1862¡¡he¡¡formulated¡¡a¡¡plan¡¡for¡¡gradual¡¡emancipation¡¡with¡¡compensation¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡slaves¡¡of¡¡Maryland£»¡¡Delaware£»¡¡Kentucky£»¡¡Missouri£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡District¡¡of¡¡Columbia¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡purchased¡¡at¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡400¡¡each£»¡¡thus¡¡involving¡¡a¡¡total¡¡expenditure¡¡of¡¡173£»000£»000¡£¡¡¡¡Although¡¡Congress¡¡adopted¡¡the¡¡joint¡¡resolution¡¡recommended¡¡by¡¡the¡¡President£»¡¡the¡¡¡¨border¡¡States¡¨¡¡would¡¡not¡¡accept¡¡the¡¡plan¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡Congress£»¡¡by¡¡virtue¡¡of¡¡its¡¡plenary¡¡power£»¡¡freed¡¡the¡¡slaves¡¡by¡¡purchase¡¡in¡¡the¡¡District¡¡of¡¡Columbia£»¡¡and¡¡pro

·µ»ØÄ¿Â¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ