°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > a history of science-4 >

µÚ2ÕÂ

a history of science-4-µÚ2ÕÂ

С˵£º a history of science-4 ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡




It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡from¡¡this¡¡that¡¡the¡¡phlogistic¡¡theory¡¡was¡¡a¡¡step¡¡towards¡¡chemistry¡¡and¡¡away¡¡from¡¡alchemy¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡led¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡¡¨spirit¡¨¡¡in¡¡metals¡¡that¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡seen£»¡¡felt£»¡¡or¡¡appreciated¡¡by¡¡any¡¡of¡¡the¡¡senses£»¡¡and¡¡substituted¡¡for¡¡it¡¡a¡¡principle¡¡which£»¡¡although¡¡a¡¡falsely¡¡conceived¡¡one£»¡¡was¡¡still¡¡much¡¡more¡¡tangible¡¡than¡¡the¡¡¡¨spirit£»¡¨¡¡since¡¡it¡¡could¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡and¡¡felt¡¡as¡¡free¡¡phlogiston¡¡and¡¡weighed¡¡and¡¡measured¡¡as¡¡combined¡¡phlogiston¡£¡¡The¡¡definiteness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡that¡¡a¡¡metal£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡was¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡phlogiston¡¡and¡¡an¡¡element¡¡was¡¡much¡¡less¡¡enigmatic£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡wrong£»¡¡than¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alchemist¡¡that¡¡¡¨metals¡¡are¡¡produced¡¡by¡¡the¡¡spiritual¡¡action¡¡of¡¡the¡¡three¡¡principles£»¡¡salt£»¡¡mercury£»¡¡sulphur¡¨particularly¡¡when¡¡it¡¡is¡¡explained¡¡that¡¡salt£»¡¡mercury£»¡¡and¡¡sulphur¡¡were¡¡really¡¡not¡¡what¡¡their¡¡names¡¡implied£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡universally¡¡accepted¡¡belief¡¡as¡¡to¡¡what¡¡they¡¡really¡¡were¡£

The¡¡metals£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡now¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡elementary¡¡bodies£»¡¡were¡¡considered¡¡compounds¡¡by¡¡the¡¡phlogistians£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡believed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡calcining¡¡of¡¡a¡¡metal¡¡was¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡simplification¡£¡¡They¡¡noted£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡remains¡¡of¡¡calcination¡¡weighed¡¡more¡¡than¡¡the¡¡original¡¡product£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡natural¡¡inference¡¡from¡¡this¡¡would¡¡be¡¡that¡¡the¡¡metal¡¡must¡¡have¡¡taken¡¡in¡¡some¡¡substance¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡have¡¡given¡¡off¡¡anything¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡the¡¡phlogistians¡¡had¡¡not¡¡learned¡¡the¡¡all¡­important¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡weights£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡variation¡¡in¡¡weight¡¡was¡¡either¡¡that¡¡such¡¡gain¡¡or¡¡loss¡¡was¡¡an¡¡unimportant¡¡¡¨accident¡¨¡¡at¡¡best£»¡¡or¡¡that¡¡phlogiston£»¡¡being¡¡light£»¡¡tended¡¡to¡¡lighten¡¡any¡¡substance¡¡containing¡¡it£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡driving¡¡it¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡metal¡¡by¡¡calcination¡¡naturally¡¡left¡¡the¡¡residue¡¡heavier¡£

At¡¡first¡¡the¡¡phlogiston¡¡theory¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡in¡¡an¡¡indisputable¡¡way¡¡all¡¡the¡¡known¡¡chemical¡¡phenomena¡£¡¡¡¡Gradually£»¡¡however£»¡¡as¡¡experiments¡¡multiplied£»¡¡it¡¡became¡¡evident¡¡that¡¡the¡¡plain¡¡theory¡¡as¡¡stated¡¡by¡¡Stahl¡¡and¡¡his¡¡followers¡¡failed¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡satisfactorily¡¡certain¡¡laboratory¡¡reactions¡£¡¡¡¡To¡¡meet¡¡these¡¡new¡¡conditions£»¡¡certain¡¡modifications¡¡were¡¡introduced¡¡from¡¡time¡¡to¡¡time£»¡¡giving¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡a¡¡flexibility¡¡that¡¡would¡¡allow¡¡it¡¡to¡¡cover¡¡all¡¡cases¡£¡¡But¡¡as¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡inexplicable¡¡experiments¡¡continued¡¡to¡¡increase£»¡¡and¡¡new¡¡modifications¡¡to¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡became¡¡necessary£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡found¡¡that¡¡some¡¡of¡¡these¡¡modifications¡¡were¡¡directly¡¡contradictory¡¡to¡¡others£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡¡the¡¡simple¡¡theory¡¡became¡¡too¡¡cumbersome¡¡from¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡its¡¡modifications¡£¡¡Its¡¡supporters¡¡disagreed¡¡among¡¡themselves£»¡¡first¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡certain¡¡phenomena¡¡that¡¡did¡¡not¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡the¡¡phlogistic¡¡theory£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡little¡¡later¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡itself¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡as¡¡yet¡¡there¡¡was¡¡no¡¡satisfactory¡¡substitute¡¡for¡¡this¡¡theory£»¡¡which£»¡¡even¡¡if¡¡unsatisfactory£»¡¡seemed¡¡better¡¡than¡¡anything¡¡that¡¡had¡¡gone¡¡before¡¡or¡¡could¡¡be¡¡suggested¡£

But¡¡the¡¡good¡¡effects¡¡of¡¡the¡¡era¡¡of¡¡experimental¡¡research£»¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡Stahl¡¡had¡¡given¡¡such¡¡an¡¡impetus£»¡¡were¡¡showing¡¡in¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡of¡¡the¡¡experimenters¡£¡¡The¡¡works¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡older¡¡writers£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Boyle¡¡and¡¡Hooke£»¡¡were¡¡again¡¡sought¡¡out¡¡in¡¡their¡¡dusty¡¡corners¡¡and¡¡consulted£»¡¡and¡¡their¡¡surmises¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡possible¡¡mixture¡¡of¡¡various¡¡gases¡¡in¡¡the¡¡air¡¡were¡¡more¡¡carefully¡¡considered¡£¡¡¡¡Still¡¡the¡¡phlogiston¡¡theory¡¡was¡¡firmly¡¡grounded¡¡in¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡philosophers£»¡¡who¡¡can¡¡hardly¡¡be¡¡censured¡¡for¡¡adhering¡¡to¡¡it£»¡¡at¡¡least¡¡until¡¡some¡¡satisfactory¡¡substitute¡¡was¡¡offered¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡foundation¡¡for¡¡such¡¡a¡¡theory¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡laid£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡see¡¡presently£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡Black£»¡¡Priestley£»¡¡Cavendish£»¡¡and¡¡Lavoisier£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡eighteenth¡¡century£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡phlogiston¡¡theory¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡said¡¡to¡¡have¡¡finally¡¡succumbed¡¡until¡¡the¡¡opening¡¡years¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nineteenth¡¡century¡£



II¡£¡¡THE¡¡BEGINNINGS¡¡OF¡¡MODERN¡¡CHEMISTRY

THE¡¡¡¨PNEUMATIC¡¨¡¡CHEMISTS

Modern¡¡chemistry¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡to¡¡have¡¡its¡¡beginning¡¡with¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡Stephen¡¡Hales¡¡£¨1677¡­1761£©£»¡¡who¡¡early¡¡in¡¡the¡¡eighteenth¡¡century¡¡began¡¡his¡¡important¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡elasticity¡¡of¡¡air¡£¡¡Departing¡¡from¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡scientists¡¡of¡¡the¡¡time£»¡¡be¡¡considered¡¡air¡¡to¡¡be¡¡¡¨a¡¡fine¡¡elastic¡¡fluid£»¡¡with¡¡particles¡¡of¡¡very¡¡different¡¡nature¡¡floating¡¡in¡¡it¡¨¡¡£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡showed¡¡that¡¡these¡¡¡¨particles¡¨¡¡could¡¡be¡¡separated¡£¡¡He¡¡pointed¡¡out£»¡¡also£»¡¡that¡¡various¡¡gases£»¡¡or¡¡¡¨airs£»¡¨¡¡as¡¡he¡¡called¡¡them£»¡¡were¡¡contained¡¡in¡¡many¡¡solid¡¡substances¡£¡¡The¡¡importance¡¡of¡¡his¡¡work£»¡¡however£»¡¡lies¡¡in¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡his¡¡general¡¡studies¡¡were¡¡along¡¡lines¡¡leading¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡accepted¡¡doctrines¡¡of¡¡the¡¡time£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡they¡¡gave¡¡the¡¡impetus¡¡to¡¡the¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡gases¡¡by¡¡such¡¡chemists¡¡as¡¡Black£»¡¡Priestley£»¡¡Cavendish£»¡¡and¡¡Lavoisier£»¡¡whose¡¡specific¡¡discoveries¡¡are¡¡the¡¡foundation¡­stones¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡chemistry¡£


JOSEPH¡¡BLACK

The¡¡careful¡¡studies¡¡of¡¡Hales¡¡were¡¡continued¡¡by¡¡his¡¡younger¡¡confrere£»¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Joseph¡¡Black¡¡£¨1728¡­1799£©£»¡¡whose¡¡experiments¡¡in¡¡the¡¡weights¡¡of¡¡gases¡¡and¡¡other¡¡chemicals¡¡were¡¡first¡¡steps¡¡in¡¡quantitative¡¡chemistry¡£¡¡But¡¡even¡¡more¡¡important¡¡than¡¡his¡¡discoveries¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡properties¡¡in¡¡general¡¡was¡¡his¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡carbonic¡­acid¡¡gas¡£

Black¡¡had¡¡been¡¡educated¡¡for¡¡the¡¡medical¡¡profession¡¡in¡¡the¡¡University¡¡of¡¡Glasgow£»¡¡being¡¡a¡¡friend¡¡and¡¡pupil¡¡of¡¡the¡¡famous¡¡Dr¡£¡¡William¡¡Cullen¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡his¡¡liking¡¡was¡¡for¡¡the¡¡chemical¡¡laboratory¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡for¡¡the¡¡practice¡¡of¡¡medicine¡£¡¡¡¡Within¡¡three¡¡years¡¡after¡¡completing¡¡his¡¡medical¡¡course£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡only¡¡twenty¡­three¡¡years¡¡of¡¡age£»¡¡he¡¡made¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡carbonic¡¡acid£»¡¡which¡¡he¡¡called¡¡by¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡¡¨fixed¡¡air¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡After¡¡discovering¡¡this¡¡gas£»¡¡Black¡¡made¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡experiments£»¡¡by¡¡which¡¡he¡¡was¡¡able¡¡to¡¡show¡¡how¡¡widely¡¡it¡¡was¡¡distributed¡¡throughout¡¡nature¡£¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡in¡¡1757£»¡¡be¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡the¡¡bubbles¡¡given¡¡off¡¡in¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡brewing£»¡¡where¡¡there¡¡was¡¡vegetable¡¡fermentation£»¡¡were¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡it¡£¡¡To¡¡prove¡¡this£»¡¡he¡¡collected¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡these¡¡bubbles¡¡in¡¡a¡¡bottle¡¡containing¡¡lime¡­water¡£¡¡When¡¡this¡¡bottle¡¡was¡¡shaken¡¡violently£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡the¡¡lime¡­water¡¡and¡¡the¡¡carbonic¡¡acid¡¡became¡¡thoroughly¡¡mixed£»¡¡an¡¡insoluble¡¡white¡¡powder¡¡was¡¡precipitated¡¡from¡¡the¡¡solution£»¡¡the¡¡carbonic¡¡acid¡¡having¡¡combined¡¡chemically¡¡with¡¡the¡¡lime¡¡to¡¡form¡¡the¡¡insoluble¡¡calcium¡¡carbonate£»¡¡or¡¡chalk¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡experiment¡¡suggested¡¡another¡£¡¡Fixing¡¡a¡¡piece¡¡of¡¡burning¡¡charcoal¡¡in¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡a¡¡bellows£»¡¡he¡¡arranged¡¡a¡¡tube¡¡so¡¡that¡¡the¡¡gas¡¡coming¡¡from¡¡the¡¡charcoal¡¡would¡¡pass¡¡through¡¡the¡¡lime¡­water£»¡¡and£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡bubbles¡¡from¡¡the¡¡brewer's¡¡vat£»¡¡he¡¡found¡¡that¡¡the¡¡white¡¡precipitate¡¡was¡¡thrown¡¡down£»¡¡in¡¡short£»¡¡that¡¡carbonic¡¡acid¡¡was¡¡given¡¡off¡¡in¡¡combustion¡£¡¡Shortly¡¡after£»¡¡Black¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡by¡¡blowing¡¡through¡¡a¡¡glass¡¡tube¡¡inserted¡¡into¡¡lime¡­water£»¡¡chalk¡¡was¡¡precipitated£»¡¡thus¡¡proving¡¡that¡¡carbonic¡¡acid¡¡was¡¡being¡¡constantly¡¡thrown¡¡off¡¡in¡¡respiration¡£

The¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡Black's¡¡discoveries¡¡was¡¡revolutionary£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡attitude¡¡of¡¡mind¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemists¡¡towards¡¡gases£»¡¡or¡¡¡¨airs£»¡¨¡¡was¡¡changed¡¡from¡¡that¡¡time¡¡forward¡£¡¡Most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemists£»¡¡however£»¡¡attempted¡¡to¡¡harmonize¡¡the¡¡new¡¡facts¡¡with¡¡the¡¡older¡¡theoriesto¡¡explain¡¡all¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡on¡¡the¡¡basis¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phlogiston¡¡theory£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡still¡¡dominant¡£¡¡But¡¡while¡¡many¡¡of¡¡Black's¡¡discoveries¡¡could¡¡not¡¡be¡¡made¡¡to¡¡harmonize¡¡with¡¡that¡¡theory£»¡¡they¡¡did¡¡not¡¡directly¡¡overthrow¡¡it¡£¡¡It¡¡required¡¡the¡¡additional¡¡discoveries¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡Black's¡¡fellow¡­scientists¡¡to¡¡complete¡¡its¡¡downfall£»¡¡as¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡see¡£


HENRY¡¡CAVENDISH

This¡¡work¡¡of¡¡Black's¡¡was¡¡followed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡equally¡¡important¡¡work¡¡of¡¡his¡¡former¡¡pupil£»¡¡Henry¡¡Cavendish¡¡£¨1731¡­1810£©£»¡¡whose¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡composition¡¡of¡¡many¡¡substances£»¡¡notably¡¡of¡¡nitric¡¡acid¡¡and¡¡of¡¡water£»¡¡was¡¡of¡¡great¡¡importance£»¡¡adding¡¡another¡¡link¡¡to¡¡the¡¡important¡¡chain¡¡of¡¡evidence¡¡against¡¡the¡¡phlogiston¡¡theory¡£¡¡Cavendish¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡eccentric¡¡figures¡¡in¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡science£»¡¡being¡¡widely¡¡known¡¡in¡¡his¡¡own¡¡time¡¡for¡¡his¡¡immense¡¡wealth¡¡and¡¡brilliant¡¡intellect£»¡¡and¡¡also¡¡for¡¡his¡¡peculiarities¡¡and¡¡his¡¡morbid¡¡sensibility£»¡¡which¡¡made¡¡him¡¡dread¡¡society£»¡¡and¡¡probably¡¡did¡¡much¡¡in¡¡determining¡¡his¡¡career¡£¡¡Fortunately¡¡for¡¡him£»¡¡and¡¡incidentally¡¡for¡¡the¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡science£»¡¡he¡¡was¡¡able¡¡to¡¡pursue¡¡laboratory¡¡investigations¡¡without¡¡being¡¡obliged¡¡to¡¡mingle¡¡with¡¡his¡¡dreaded¡¡fellow¡­mortals£»¡¡his¡¡every¡¡want¡¡being¡¡provided¡¡for¡¡by¡¡the¡¡immense¡¡fortune¡¡inherited¡¡from¡¡his¡¡father¡¡and¡¡an¡¡uncle¡£

When¡¡a¡¡young¡¡man£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡pupil¡¡of¡¡Dr¡£¡¡Black£»¡¡he¡¡had¡¡become¡¡imbued¡¡with¡¡the¡¡enthusiasm¡¡of¡¡his¡¡teacher£»¡¡continuing¡¡Black's¡¡investigations¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡carbonic¡­acid¡¡gas¡¡when¡¡free¡¡and¡¡in¡¡combination¡£¡¡One¡¡of¡¡his¡¡first¡¡investigations¡¡was¡¡reported¡¡in¡¡1766£»¡¡when¡¡he¡¡communicated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Royal¡¡Society¡¡his¡¡experiments¡¡for¡¡ascertaining¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡carbonic¡­acid¡¡and¡¡hydrogen¡¡gas£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡first¡¡showed¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡weighing¡¡permanently¡¡elastic¡¡fluids£»¡¡although¡¡Torricelli¡¡had¡¡before¡¡this¡¡shown¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡weights¡¡of¡¡a¡¡column¡¡of¡¡air¡¡and¡¡a¡¡column¡¡of¡¡mercury¡£¡¡Other¡¡important¡¡experiments¡¡were¡¡continued¡¡by¡¡Cavendish£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡1784¡¡he¡¡announced¡¡his¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡composition¡¡of¡¡water£»¡¡thus¡¡robbing¡¡it¡¡of¡¡its¡¡time¡­honored¡¡position¡¡as¡¡an¡¡¡¨element¡£¡¨¡¡But¡¡his¡¡claim¡¡to¡¡priority¡¡in¡¡this¡¡discovery¡¡was¡¡at¡¡once¡¡disputed¡¡by¡¡his¡¡fellow¡­countryman¡¡James¡¡Watt¡¡and¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Frenchman¡¡Lavoisier¡£¡¡Lavoisier's¡¡claim¡¡was¡¡soon¡¡disallowed¡¡even¡¡by¡¡his¡¡own¡¡countrymen£»¡¡but¡¡for¡¡many¡¡years¡¡a¡¡bitter¡¡controversy¡¡was¡¡carried¡¡on¡¡by¡¡the¡¡partisans¡¡of¡¡Watt¡¡and¡¡Cavendish¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡two¡¡principals£»¡¡however£»¡¡seem¡£¡¡never¡¡to¡¡have¡¡entered¡¡into¡¡this¡¡controversy¡¡with¡¡anything¡¡like¡¡the¡¡same¡¡ardor¡¡as¡¡some¡¡of¡¡their¡¡successors£»¡¡as¡¡they¡¡remained¡¡on¡¡the¡¡best¡¡of¡¡terms¡££§1£§¡¡It¡¡is¡¡certain£»¡¡at¡¡any¡¡rate£»¡¡that¡¡Cavendish¡¡announced¡¡his¡¡discovery¡¡officially¡¡before¡¡Watt¡¡claimed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡announcement¡¡had¡¡been¡¡previously¡¡made¡¡by¡¡him£»¡¡¡¨and£»¡¡whether¡¡right¡¡or¡¡wrong£»¡¡the¡¡honor¡¡of¡¡scientific¡¡discoveries¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡be¡¡accorded¡¡naturally¡¡to¡¡the¡¡man¡¡who¡¡first¡¡publishes¡¡a¡¡demonstration¡¡of¡¡his¡¡discovery¡£¡¨¡¡Englishmen¡¡very¡¡generally¡¡admit¡¡the¡¡justness¡¡of¡¡Cavendish's¡¡claim£»¡¡although¡¡the¡¡French¡¡scientist¡¡Arago£»¡¡after¡¡reviewing¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡carefully¡¡in¡¡1833£»¡¡decided¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡Watt¡£

It¡¡appears¡¡that¡¡something¡¡like¡¡a¡¡year¡¡before¡¡Cavendish¡¡made¡¡known¡¡his¡¡complete¡¡demonstration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡composition¡¡of¡¡water£»¡¡Watt¡¡communicated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Royal¡¡Society¡¡a¡¡suggestion¡¡that¡¡water¡¡was¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡¡¨dephlogisticated¡¡air¡¡£¨oxygen£©¡¡and¡¡phlogiston¡¡£¨hydrogen£©¡¡deprived¡¡of¡¡part¡¡of¡¡its¡¡latent¡¡heat¡£¡¨¡¡Cavendish¡¡knew¡¡of¡¡the¡¡suggestion£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡his¡¡experiments¡¡refuted¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡the¡¡hydrogen¡¡lost¡¡any¡¡of¡¡its¡¡latent¡¡heat¡£¡¡Furthermore£»¡¡Watt¡¡merely¡¡suggested¡¡the¡¡possible¡¡composition¡¡without¡¡proving¡¡it£»¡¡although¡¡his¡¡idea¡¡was¡¡practically¡¡correct£»¡¡if¡¡we¡¡can¡¡rightly¡¡interpret¡¡the¡¡vagaries¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nomenclature¡¡then¡¡in¡¡use¡£¡¡But¡¡had¡¡Watt¡¡taken¡¡the¡¡steps¡¡to¡¡demonstrate¡¡his¡¡theory£»¡¡the¡¡great¡¡¡¨Water¡¡Controversy¡¨¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡avoided¡£¡¡Cavendish's¡¡report¡¡of¡¡his¡¡discovery¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Royal¡¡Society¡¡covers¡¡something¡¡like¡¡forty¡¡pages¡¡of¡¡printed¡¡matter¡£¡¡In¡¡this¡¡he¡¡shows¡¡how£»¡¡by¡¡passing¡¡an¡¡electric¡¡spark¡¡through¡¡a¡¡closed¡¡jar¡¡containing¡¡a¡¡mixture¡¡of¡¡hydrogen¡¡gas¡¡and¡¡oxygen£»¡¡water¡¡is¡¡invariably¡¡formed£»¡¡apparently¡¡by¡¡the¡¡union¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡gases¡£¡¡The¡¡experiment¡¡was¡¡first¡¡tried¡¡with¡¡hydrogen¡¡and¡¡common¡¡air£»¡¡the¡¡oxygen¡¡of¡¡the¡¡air¡¡uniting¡¡with¡¡the¡¡hydrogen¡¡to¡¡form¡¡water£»¡¡leaving¡¡the¡¡nitrogen¡¡of¡¡the¡¡air¡¡still¡¡to¡¡be¡¡accounted¡¡for¡£¡¡With¡¡pure¡¡oxygen¡¡and¡¡hydrogen£»¡¡however£»¡¡Cavendish¡¡found¡¡that¡¡pure¡¡water¡¡was¡¡formed£»¡¡leaving¡¡slight¡¡traces¡¡of¡¡any¡¡other£»¡¡substance¡¡which¡¡might¡¡not¡¡be¡¡interpreted¡¡as¡¡being¡¡Chemical¡¡impurities¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡only¡¡one¡¡possible¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡this¡¡phenomenonth

·µ»ØÄ¿Â¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ