握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > the six enneads >

及59嫗

the six enneads-及59嫗

弌傍�� the six enneads 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



refore possesses nothing beyond itself。     Once you have uttered ;The Good�察─�add no further thought�此�by any addition�察�and in proportion to that addition�察�you introduce a deficiency。     Do not even say that it has Intellection�察�you would be dividing it�察�it would become a duality�察�Intellect and the Good。 The Good has no need of the Intellectual´Principle which�察�on the contrary�察�needs it�察�and�察�attaining it�察�is shaped into Goodness and becomes perfect by it�此�the Form thus received�察�sprung from the Good�察�brings it to likeness with the Good。     Thus the traces of the Good discerned upon it must be taken as indication of the nature of that Archetype�此�we form a conception of its Authentic Being from its image playing upon the Intellectual´Principle。 This image of itself�察�it has communicated to the Intellect that contemplates it�此�thus all the striving is on the side of the Intellect�察�which is the eternal striver and eternally the attainer。 The Being beyond neither strives�察�since it feels no lack�察�nor attains�察�since it has no striving。 And this marks it off from the Intellectual´Principle�察�to which characteristically belongs the striving�察�the concentrated strain towards its Form。     Yet�此�The Intellectual´Principle�察�beautiful�察�the most beautiful of all�察�lying lapped in pure light and in clear radiance�察�circumscribing the Nature of the Authentic Existents�察�the original of which this beautiful world is a shadow and an image�察�tranquil in the fullness of glory since in it there is nothing devoid of intellect�察�nothing dark or out of rule�察�a living thing in a life of blessedness�此�this�察�too�察�must overwhelm with awe any that has seen it�察�and penetrated it�察�to become a unit of its Being。     But�此�As one that looks up to the heavens and sees the splendour of the stars thinks of the Maker and searches�察�so whoever has contemplated the Intellectual Universe and known it and wondered for it must search after its Maker too。 What Being has raised so noble a fabric�拭�And where�拭�And how�拭�Who has begotten such a child�察�this Intellectual´Principle�察�this lovely abundance so abundantly endowed�拭    �The Source of all this cannot be an Intellect�察�nor can it be an abundant power�此�it must have been before Intellect and abundance were�察�these are later and things of lack�察�abundance had to be made abundant and Intellection needed to know。     These are very near to the un´needing�察�to that which has no need of Knowing�察�they have abundance and intellection authentically�察�as being the first to possess。 But�察�there is that before them which neither needs nor possesses anything�察�since�察�needing or possessing anything else�察�it would not be what it is´ the Good。                         NINTH TRACTATE。

                    DETACHED CONSIDERATIONS。

    1。 ;The Intellectual´Principle; ��= the Divine Mind�А� we read ��in the Timaeus�А� ;looks upon the Ideas indwelling in that Being which is the Essentially Living ��= according to Plotinus�察�the Intellectual Realm�В察 �and then;´ the text proceeds´ ;the Creator judged that all the content of that essentially living Being must find place in this lower universe also。;     Are we meant to gather that the Ideas came into being before the Intellectual´Principle so that it ;sees them; as previously existent�拭    �The first step is to make sure whether the ;Living Being; of the text is to be distinguished from the Intellectual´Principle as another thing than it。     It might be argued that the Intellectual´Principle is the Contemplator and therefore that the Living´Being contemplated is not the Intellectual´Principle but must be described as the Intellectual Object so that the Intellectual´Principle must possess the Ideal realm as something outside of itself。     But this would mean that it possesses images and not the realities�察�since the realities are in the Intellectual Realm which it contemplates�此�Reality´ we read´ is in the Authentic Existent which contains the essential form of particular things。     No�此�even though the Intellectual´Principle and the Intellectual Object are distinct�察�they are not apart except for just that distinction。     Nothing in the statement cited is inconsistent with the conception that these two constitute one substance´ though�察�in a unity�察�admitting that distinction�察�of the intellectual act ��as against passivity�В察�without which there can be no question of an Intellectual´Principle and an Intellectual Object�此�what is meant is not that the contemplatory Being possesses its vision as in some other principle�察�but that it contains the Intellectual Realm within itself。     The Intelligible Object is the Intellectual´Principle itself in its repose�察�unity�察�immobility�此�the Intellectual´Principle�察�contemplator of that object´ of the Intellectual´Principle thus in repose is an active manifestation of the same Being�察�an Act which contemplates its unmoved phase and�察�as thus contemplating�察�stands as Intellectual´Principle to that of which it has the intellection�此�it is Intellectual´Principle in virtue of having that intellection�察�and at the same time is Intellectual Object�察�by assimilation。     This�察�then�察�is the Being which planned to create in the lower Universe what it saw existing in the Supreme�察�the four orders of living beings。     No doubt the passage�此。�of the Timaeus�А�seems to imply tacitly that this planning Principle is distinct from the other two�此�but the three´ the Essentially´Living�察�the Intellectual´Principle and this planning Principle will�察�to others�察�be manifestly one�此�the truth is that�察�by a common accident�察�a particular trend of thought has occasioned the discrimination。     We have dealt with the first two�察�but the third´ this Principle which decides to work upon the objects ��the Ideas�А�contemplated by the Intellectual´Principle within the Essentially´Living�察�to create them�察�to establish them in their partial existence´ what is this third�拭    �It is possible that in one aspect the Intellectual´Principle is the principle of partial existence�察�while in another aspect it is not。     The entities thus particularized from the unity are products of the Intellectual´Principle which thus would be�察�to that extent�察�the separating agent。 On the other hand it remains in itself�察�indivisible�察�division begins with its offspring which�察�of course�察�means with Souls�此�and thus a Soul´ with its particular Souls´ may be the separative principle。     This is what is conveyed where we are told that the separation is the work of the third Principle and begins within the Third�此�for to this Third belongs the discursive reasoning which is no function of the Intellectual´Principle but characteristic of its secondary�察�of Soul�察�to which precisely�察�divided by its own Kind�察�belongs the Act of division。     2。。。。 For in any one science the reduction of the total of knowledge into its separate propositions does not shatter its unity�察�chipping it into unrelated fragments�察�in each distinct item is talent the entire body of the science�察�an integral thing in its highest Principle and its last detail�此�and similarly a man must so discipline himself that the first Principles of his Being are also his completions�察�are totals�察�that all be pointed towards the loftiest phase of the Nature�此�when a man has become this unity in the best�察�he is in that other realm�察�for it is by this highest within himself�察�made his own�察�that he holds to the Supreme。     At no point did the All´Soul come into Being�此�it never arrived�察�for it never knew place�察�what happens is that body�察�neighbouring with it�察�participates in it�此�hence Plato does not place Soul in body but body in Soul。 The others�察�the secondary Souls�察�have a point of departure´ they come from the All´Soul´ and they have a Place into which to descend and in which to change to and fro�察�a place�察�therefore�察�from which to ascend�此�but this All´Soul is for ever Above�察�resting in that Being in which it holds its existence as Soul and followed�察�as next�察�by the Universe or�察�at least�察�by all beneath the sun。     The partial Soul is illuminated by moving towards the Soul above it�察�for on that path it meets Authentic Existence。 Movement towards the lower is towards non´Being�此�and this is the step it takes when it is set on self�察�for by willing towards itself it produces its lower�察�an image of itself´ a non´Being´ and so is wandering�察�as it were�察�into the void�察�stripping itself of its own determined form。 And this image�察�this undetermined thing�察�is blank darkness�察�for it is utterly without reason�察�untouched by the Intellectual´Principle�察�far removed from Authentic Being。     As long as it remains at the mid´stage it is in its own peculiar region�察�but when�察�by a sort of inferior orientation�察�it looks downward�察�it shapes that lower image and flings itself joyfully thither。     3。 ��A��。。。 How�察�then�察�does Unity give rise to Multiplicity�拭    �By its omnipresence�此�there is nowhere where it is not�察�it occupies�察�therefore�察�all that is�察�at once�察�it is manifold´ or�察�rather�察�it is all things。     If it were simply and solely everywhere�察�all would be this one thing alone�此�but it is�察�also�察�in no place�察�and this gives�察�in the final result�察�that�察�while all exists by means of it�察�in virtue of its omnipresence�察�all is distinct from it in virtue of its being nowhere。     But why is it not merely present everywhere but in addition nowhere´present�拭    �Because�察�universality demands a previous unity。 It must�察�therefore�察�pervade all things and make all�察�but not be the universe which it makes。     ��B�� The Soul itself must exist as Seeing´ with the Intellectual´Principle as the object of its vision´ it is undetermined before it sees but is naturally apt to see�此�in other words�察�Soul is Matter to ��its determinant�А�the Intellectual´Principle。     ��C�� When we exercise intellection upon ourselves�察�we are�察�obviously�察�observing an intellective nature�察�for otherwise we would not be able to have that intellection。     We know�察�and it is ourselves that we know�察�therefore we know the reality of a knowing nature�此�therefore�察�before that intellection in Act�察�there is another intellection�察�one at rest�察�so to speak。     Similarly�察�that self´intellection is an act upon a reality and upon a life�察�therefore�察�before the Life and Real´Being concerned in the intellection�察�there must be another Being and Life。 In a word�察�intellection is vested in the activities themselves�此�since�察�then�察�the activities of self´intellection are intellective´forms�察�We�察�the Authentic We�察�are the Intelligibles and self´intellection conveys the Image of the Intellectual Sphere。     ��D�� The Primal is a potentiality of Movement and of Repose´ and so is above and beyond both´ its next subsequent has rest and movement about the Primal。 Now this subsequent is the Intellectual´Principle´ so characterized by having intellection of something not identical with itself whereas the Primal is without intellection。 A knowing principle has duality ��that entailed by being the knower of something�� and�察�moreover�察�it knows itself as deficient since its virtue consists in this knowing and not in its own bare Being。     ��E�� In the case of everything which has developed from possibility to actuality the actual is that which remains self´identical for its entire duration´ and this it is which makes perfection possible even in things of the corporeal order�察�as for instance in fire but the actual of this kind cannot be everlasting

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��

低辛嬬浪散議