the six enneads-及12嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
her�察�its act be directed towards the Best�察�the achievement is not merely the ;Soul's good; but ;The Good; without qualification。 Now�察�given an Existent which´ as being itself the best of existences and even transcending the existences´ directs its Act towards no other�察�but is the object to which the Act of all else is directed�察�it is clear that this must be at once the Good and the means through which all else may participate in Good。 This Absolute Good other entities may possess in two ways´ by becoming like to It and by directing the Act of their being towards It。 Now�察�if all aspiration and Act whatsoever are directed towards the Good�察�it follows that the Essential´Good neither need nor can look outside itself or aspire to anything other than itself�此�it can but remain unmoved�察�as being�察�in the constitution of things�察�the wellspring and firstcause of all Act�此�whatsoever in other entities is of the nature of Good cannot be due to any Act of the Essential´Good upon them�察�it is for them on the contrary to act towards their source and cause。 The Good must�察�then�察�be the Good not by any Act�察�not even by virtue of its Intellection�察�but by its very rest within Itself。 Existing beyond and above Being�察�it must be beyond and above the Intellectual´Principle and all Intellection。 For�察�again�察�that only can be named the Good to which all is bound and itself to none�此�for only thus is it veritably the object of all aspiration。 It must be unmoved�察�while all circles around it�察�as a circumference around a centre from which all the radii proceed。 Another example would be the sun�察�central to the light which streams from it and is yet linked to it�察�or at least is always about it�察�irremoveably�察�try all you will to separate the light from the sun�察�or the sun from its light�察�for ever the light is in the sun。 2。 But the Universe outside�察�how is it aligned towards the Good�拭 �The soulless by direction toward Soul�此�Soul towards the Good itself�察�through the Intellectual´Principle。 Everything has something of the Good�察�by virtue of possessing a certain degree of unity and a certain degree of Existence and by participation in Ideal´Form�此�to the extent of the Unity�察�Being�察�and Form which are present�察�there is a sharing in an image�察�for the Unity and Existence in which there is participation are no more than images of the Ideal´Form。 With Soul it is different�察�the First´Soul�察�that which follows upon the Intellectual´Principle�察�possesses a life nearer to the Verity and through that Principle is of the nature of good�察�it will actually possess the Good if it orientate itself towards the Intellectual´Principle�察�since this follows immediately upon the Good。 In sum�察�then�察�life is the Good to the living�察�and the Intellectual´Principle to what is intellective�察�so that where there is life with intellection there is a double contact with the Good。 3。 But if life is a good�察�is there good for all that lives�拭 �No�此�in the vile�察�life limps�此�it is like the eye to the dim´sighted�察�it fails of its task。 But if the mingled strand of life is to us�察�though entwined with evil�察�still in the total a good�察�must not death be an evil�拭 �Evil to What�拭�There must be a subject for the evil�此�but if the possible subject is no longer among beings�察�or�察�still among beings�察�is devoid of life。。。 why�察�a stone is not more immune。 If�察�on the contrary�察�after death life and soul continue�察�then death will be no evil but a good�察�Soul�察�disembodied�察�is the freer to ply its own Act。 If it be taken into the All´Soul´ what evil can reach it There�拭�And as the Gods are possessed of Good and untouched by evil´ so�察�certainly is the Soul that has preserved its essential character。 And if it should lose its purity�察�the evil it experiences is not in its death but in its life。 Suppose it to be under punishment in the lower world�察�even there the evil thing is its life and not its death�察�the misfortune is still life�察�a life of a definite character。 Life is a partnership of a Soul and body�察�death is the dissolution�察�in either life or death�察�then�察�the Soul will feel itself at home。 But�察�again�察�if life is good�察�how can death be anything but evil�拭 �Remember that the good of life�察�where it has any good at all�察�is not due to anything in the partnership but to the repelling of evil by virtue�察�death�察�then�察�must be the greater good。 In a word�察�life in the body is of itself an evil but the Soul enters its Good through Virtue�察�not living the life of the Couplement but holding itself apart�察�even here。 EIGHTH TRACTATE。
ON THE NATURE AND SOURCE OF EVIL。
1。 Those enquiring whence Evil enters into beings�察�or rather into a certain order of beings�察�would be making the best beginning if they established�察�first of all�察�what precisely Evil is�察�what constitutes its Nature。 At once we should know whence it comes�察�where it has its native seat and where it is present merely as an accident�察�and there would be no further question as to whether it has Authentic´Existence。 But a difficulty arises。 By what faculty in us could we possibly know Evil�拭 �All knowing comes by likeness。 The Intellectual´Principle and the Soul�察�being Ideal´Forms�察�would know Ideal´Forms and would have a natural tendency towards them�察�but who could imagine Evil to be an Ideal´Form�察�seeing that it manifests itself as the very absence of Good�拭 �If the solution is that the one act of knowing covers contraries�察�and that as Evil is the contrary to Good the one act would grasp Good and Evil together�察�then to know Evil there must be first a clear perception and understanding of Good�察�since the nobler existences precede the baser and are Ideal´Forms while the less good hold no such standing�察�are nearer to Non´Being。 No doubt there is a question in what precise way Good is contrary to Evil´ whether it is as First´Principle to last of things or as Ideal´Form to utter Lack�此�but this subject we postpone。 2。 For the moment let us define the nature of the Good as far as the immediate purpose demands。 The Good is that on which all else depends�察�towards which all Existences aspire as to their source and their need�察�while Itself is without need�察�sufficient to Itself�察�aspiring to no other�察�the measure and Term of all�察�giving out from itself the Intellectual´Principle and Existence and Soul and Life and all Intellective´Act。 All until The Good is reached is beautiful�察�The Good is beyond´beautiful�察�beyond the Highest�察�holding kingly state in the Intellectual´Kosmos�察�that sphere constituted by a Principle wholly unlike what is known as Intelligence in us。 Our intelligence is nourished on the propositions of logic�察�is skilled in following discussions�察�works by reasonings�察�examines links of demonstration�察�and comes to know the world of Being also by the steps of logical process�察�having no prior grasp of Reality but remaining empty�察�all Intelligence though it be�察�until it has put itself to school。 The Intellectual´Principle we are discussing is not of such a kind�此�It possesses all�此�It is all�此�It is present to all by Its self´presence�此�It has all by other means than having�察�for what It possesses is still Itself�察�nor does any particular of all within It stand apart�察�for every such particular is the whole and in all respects all�察�while yet not confused in the mass but still distinct�察�apart to the extent that any participant in the Intellectual´Principle participates not in the entire as one thing but in whatsoever lies within its own reach。 And the First Act is the Act of The Good stationary within Itself�察�and the First Existence is the self´contained Existence of The Good�察�but there is also an Act upon It�察�that of the Intellectual´Principle which�察�as it were�察�lives about It。 And the Soul�察�outside�察�circles around the Intellectual´Principle�察�and by gazing upon it�察�seeing into the depths of It�察�through It sees God。 Such is the untroubled�察�the blissful�察�life of divine beings�察�and Evil has no place in it�察�if this were all�察�there would be no Evil but Good only�察�the first�察�the second and the third Good。 All�察�thus far�察�is with the King of All�察�unfailing Cause of Good and Beauty and controller of all�察�and what is Good in the second degree depends upon the Second´Principle and tertiary Good upon the Third。 3。 If such be the Nature of Beings and of That which transcends all the realm of Being�察�Evil cannot have place among Beings or in the Beyond´Being�察�these are good。 There remains�察�only�察�if Evil exist at all�察�that it be situate in the realm of Non´Being�察�that it be some mode�察�as it were�察�of the Non´Being�察�that it have its seat in something in touch with Non´Being or to a certain degree communicate in Non´Being。 By this Non´Being�察�of course�察�we are not to understand something that simply does not exist�察�but only something of an utterly different order from Authentic´Being�此�there is no question here of movement or position with regard to Being�察�the Non´Being we are thinking of is�察�rather�察�an image of Being or perhaps something still further removed than even an image。 Now this ��the required faint image of Being�А�might be the sensible universe with all the impressions it engenders�察�or it might be something of even later derivation�察�accidental to the realm of sense�察�or again�察�it might be the source of the sense´world or something of the same order entering into it to complete it。 Some conception of it would be reached by thinking of measurelessness as opposed to measure�察�of the unbounded against bound�察�the unshaped against a principle of shape�察�the ever´needy against the self´sufficing�此�think of the ever´undefined�察�the never at rest�察�the all´accepting but never sated�察�utter dearth�察�and make all this character not mere accident in it but its equivalent for essential´being�察�so that�察�whatsoever fragment of it be taken�察�that part is all lawless void�察�while whatever participates in it and resembles it becomes evil�察�though not of course to the point of being�察�as itself is�察�Evil´Absolute。 In what substantial´form ��hypostasis�А�then is all this to be found´ not as accident but as the very substance itself�拭 �For if Evil can enter into other things�察�it must have in a certain sense a prior existence�察�even though it may not be an essence。 As there is Good�察�the Absolute�察�as well as Good�察�the quality�察�so�察�together with the derived evil entering into something not itself�察�there must be the Absolute Evil。 But how�拭�Can there be Unmeasure apart from an unmeasured object�拭 �Does not Measure exist apart from unmeasured things�拭�Precisely as there is Measure apart from anything measured�察�so there is Unmeasure apart from the unmeasured。 If Unmeasure could not exist independently�察�it must exist either in an unmeasured object or in something measured�察�but the unmeasured could not need Unmeasure and the measured could not contain it。 There must�察�then�察�be some Undetermination´Absolute�察�some Absolute Formlessness�察�all the qualities cited as characterizing the Nature of Evil must be summed under an Absolute Evil�察�and every evil thing outside of this must either contain this Absolute by saturation or have taken the character of evil and become a cause of evil by consecration to this Absolute。 What will this be�拭 �That Kind whose place is below all the pat