orthodoxy-µÚ29ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
Pagan¡¡optimists¡¡and¡¡Eastern¡¡pessimists¡¡would¡¡both¡¡have¡¡temples£»
just¡¡as¡¡Liberals¡¡and¡¡Tories¡¡would¡¡both¡¡have¡¡newspapers¡£¡¡¡¡Creeds¡¡that
exist¡¡to¡¡destroy¡¡each¡¡other¡¡both¡¡have¡¡scriptures£»¡¡just¡¡as¡¡armies
that¡¡exist¡¡to¡¡destroy¡¡each¡¡other¡¡both¡¡have¡¡guns¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡great¡¡example¡¡of¡¡this¡¡alleged¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡all¡¡human¡¡religions
is¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡spiritual¡¡identity¡¡of¡¡Buddhism¡¡and¡¡Christianity¡£¡¡
Those¡¡who¡¡adopt¡¡this¡¡theory¡¡generally¡¡avoid¡¡the¡¡ethics¡¡of¡¡most
other¡¡creeds£»¡¡except£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡Confucianism£»¡¡which¡¡they¡¡like
because¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡a¡¡creed¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡they¡¡are¡¡cautious¡¡in¡¡their¡¡praises
of¡¡Mahommedanism£»¡¡generally¡¡confining¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡imposing
its¡¡morality¡¡only¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡refreshment¡¡of¡¡the¡¡lower¡¡classes¡£¡¡
They¡¡seldom¡¡suggest¡¡the¡¡Mahommedan¡¡view¡¡of¡¡marriage¡¡£¨for¡¡which
there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡great¡¡deal¡¡to¡¡be¡¡said£©£»¡¡and¡¡towards¡¡Thugs¡¡and¡¡fetish
worshippers¡¡their¡¡attitude¡¡may¡¡even¡¡be¡¡called¡¡cold¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡in¡¡the
case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡great¡¡religion¡¡of¡¡Gautama¡¡they¡¡feel¡¡sincerely¡¡a¡¡similarity¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Students¡¡of¡¡popular¡¡science£»¡¡like¡¡Mr¡£¡¡Blatchford£»¡¡are¡¡always
insisting¡¡that¡¡Christianity¡¡and¡¡Buddhism¡¡are¡¡very¡¡much¡¡alike£»
especially¡¡Buddhism¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡generally¡¡believed£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡believed
it¡¡myself¡¡until¡¡I¡¡read¡¡a¡¡book¡¡giving¡¡the¡¡reasons¡¡for¡¡it¡£¡¡
The¡¡reasons¡¡were¡¡of¡¡two¡¡kinds£º¡¡¡¡resemblances¡¡that¡¡meant¡¡nothing
because¡¡they¡¡were¡¡common¡¡to¡¡all¡¡humanity£»¡¡and¡¡resemblances¡¡which
were¡¡not¡¡resemblances¡¡at¡¡all¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡author¡¡solemnly¡¡explained¡¡that
the¡¡two¡¡creeds¡¡were¡¡alike¡¡in¡¡things¡¡in¡¡which¡¡all¡¡creeds¡¡are¡¡alike£»
or¡¡else¡¡he¡¡described¡¡them¡¡as¡¡alike¡¡in¡¡some¡¡point¡¡in¡¡which¡¡they
are¡¡quite¡¡obviously¡¡different¡£¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡as¡¡a¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡class£»
he¡¡said¡¡that¡¡both¡¡Christ¡¡and¡¡Buddha¡¡were¡¡called¡¡by¡¡the¡¡divine¡¡voice
coming¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sky£»¡¡as¡¡if¡¡you¡¡would¡¡expect¡¡the¡¡divine¡¡voice
to¡¡come¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡coal¡cellar¡£¡¡Or£»¡¡again£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡gravely¡¡urged
that¡¡these¡¡two¡¡Eastern¡¡teachers£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡singular¡¡coincidence£»¡¡both¡¡had
to¡¡do¡¡with¡¡the¡¡washing¡¡of¡¡feet¡£¡¡¡¡You¡¡might¡¡as¡¡well¡¡say¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was
a¡¡remarkable¡¡coincidence¡¡that¡¡they¡¡both¡¡had¡¡feet¡¡to¡¡wash¡£¡¡¡¡And¡¡the
other¡¡class¡¡of¡¡similarities¡¡were¡¡those¡¡which¡¡simply¡¡were¡¡not¡¡similar¡£¡¡
Thus¡¡this¡¡reconciler¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡religions¡¡draws¡¡earnest¡¡attention
to¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡at¡¡certain¡¡religious¡¡feasts¡¡the¡¡robe¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Lama
is¡¡rent¡¡in¡¡pieces¡¡out¡¡of¡¡respect£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡remnants¡¡highly¡¡valued¡£¡¡
But¡¡this¡¡is¡¡the¡¡reverse¡¡of¡¡a¡¡resemblance£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡garments¡¡of¡¡Christ
were¡¡not¡¡rent¡¡in¡¡pieces¡¡out¡¡of¡¡respect£»¡¡but¡¡out¡¡of¡¡derision£»
and¡¡the¡¡remnants¡¡were¡¡not¡¡highly¡¡valued¡¡except¡¡for¡¡what¡¡they¡¡would
fetch¡¡in¡¡the¡¡rag¡¡shops¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡rather¡¡like¡¡alluding¡¡to¡¡the¡¡obvious
connection¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡ceremonies¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sword£º¡¡¡¡when¡¡it¡¡taps
a¡¡man's¡¡shoulder£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡it¡¡cuts¡¡off¡¡his¡¡head¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡not¡¡at¡¡all
similar¡¡for¡¡the¡¡man¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡scraps¡¡of¡¡puerile¡¡pedantry¡¡would¡¡indeed
matter¡¡little¡¡if¡¡it¡¡were¡¡not¡¡also¡¡true¡¡that¡¡the¡¡alleged¡¡philosophical
resemblances¡¡are¡¡also¡¡of¡¡these¡¡two¡¡kinds£»¡¡either¡¡proving¡¡too¡¡much
or¡¡not¡¡proving¡¡anything¡£¡¡¡¡That¡¡Buddhism¡¡approves¡¡of¡¡mercy¡¡or¡¡of
self¡restraint¡¡is¡¡not¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡specially¡¡like¡¡Christianity£»
it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡utterly¡¡unlike¡¡all¡¡human¡¡existence¡£¡¡
Buddhists¡¡disapprove¡¡in¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡cruelty¡¡or¡¡excess¡¡because¡¡all
sane¡¡human¡¡beings¡¡disapprove¡¡in¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡cruelty¡¡or¡¡excess¡£¡¡
But¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡Buddhism¡¡and¡¡Christianity¡¡give¡¡the¡¡same¡¡philosophy
of¡¡these¡¡things¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡false¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡humanity¡¡does¡¡agree¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are
in¡¡a¡¡net¡¡of¡¡sin¡£¡¡¡¡Most¡¡of¡¡humanity¡¡agrees¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡some¡¡way¡¡out¡£¡¡
But¡¡as¡¡to¡¡what¡¡is¡¡the¡¡way¡¡out£»¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡think¡¡that¡¡there¡¡are¡¡two
institutions¡¡in¡¡the¡¡universe¡¡which¡¡contradict¡¡each¡¡other¡¡so¡¡flatly
as¡¡Buddhism¡¡and¡¡Christianity¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Even¡¡when¡¡I¡¡thought£»¡¡with¡¡most¡¡other¡¡well¡informed£»¡¡though
unscholarly£»¡¡people£»¡¡that¡¡Buddhism¡¡and¡¡Christianity¡¡were¡¡alike£»
there¡¡was¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡about¡¡them¡¡that¡¡always¡¡perplexed¡¡me£»
I¡¡mean¡¡the¡¡startling¡¡difference¡¡in¡¡their¡¡type¡¡of¡¡religious¡¡art¡£¡¡
I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡mean¡¡in¡¡its¡¡technical¡¡style¡¡of¡¡representation£»
but¡¡in¡¡the¡¡things¡¡that¡¡it¡¡was¡¡manifestly¡¡meant¡¡to¡¡represent¡£¡¡
No¡¡two¡¡ideals¡¡could¡¡be¡¡more¡¡opposite¡¡than¡¡a¡¡Christian¡¡saint
in¡¡a¡¡Gothic¡¡cathedral¡¡and¡¡a¡¡Buddhist¡¡saint¡¡in¡¡a¡¡Chinese¡¡temple¡£¡¡
The¡¡opposition¡¡exists¡¡at¡¡every¡¡point£»¡¡but¡¡perhaps¡¡the¡¡shortest
statement¡¡of¡¡it¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Buddhist¡¡saint¡¡always¡¡has¡¡his¡¡eyes¡¡shut£»
while¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡saint¡¡always¡¡has¡¡them¡¡very¡¡wide¡¡open¡£¡¡
The¡¡Buddhist¡¡saint¡¡has¡¡a¡¡sleek¡¡and¡¡harmonious¡¡body£»¡¡but¡¡his¡¡eyes
are¡¡heavy¡¡and¡¡sealed¡¡with¡¡sleep¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡mediaeval¡¡saint's¡¡body¡¡is
wasted¡¡to¡¡its¡¡crazy¡¡bones£»¡¡but¡¡his¡¡eyes¡¡are¡¡frightfully¡¡alive¡£¡¡
There¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡any¡¡real¡¡community¡¡of¡¡spirit¡¡between¡¡forces¡¡that
produced¡¡symbols¡¡so¡¡different¡¡as¡¡that¡£¡¡¡¡Granted¡¡that¡¡both¡¡images
are¡¡extravagances£»¡¡are¡¡perversions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pure¡¡creed£»¡¡it¡¡must¡¡be
a¡¡real¡¡divergence¡¡which¡¡could¡¡produce¡¡such¡¡opposite¡¡extravagances¡£¡¡
The¡¡Buddhist¡¡is¡¡looking¡¡with¡¡a¡¡peculiar¡¡intentness¡¡inwards¡£¡¡
The¡¡Christian¡¡is¡¡staring¡¡with¡¡a¡¡frantic¡¡intentness¡¡outwards¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡we
follow¡¡that¡¡clue¡¡steadily¡¡we¡¡shall¡¡find¡¡some¡¡interesting¡¡things¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡short¡¡time¡¡ago¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Besant£»¡¡in¡¡an¡¡interesting¡¡essay£»
announced¡¡that¡¡there¡¡was¡¡only¡¡one¡¡religion¡¡in¡¡the¡¡world£»¡¡that¡¡all
faiths¡¡were¡¡only¡¡versions¡¡or¡¡perversions¡¡of¡¡it£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡she¡¡was
quite¡¡prepared¡¡to¡¡say¡¡what¡¡it¡¡was¡£¡¡¡¡According¡¡to¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Besant¡¡this
universal¡¡Church¡¡is¡¡simply¡¡the¡¡universal¡¡self¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the¡¡doctrine
that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡really¡¡all¡¡one¡¡person£»¡¡that¡¡there¡¡are¡¡no¡¡real¡¡walls¡¡of
individuality¡¡between¡¡man¡¡and¡¡man¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡I¡¡may¡¡put¡¡it¡¡so£»¡¡she¡¡does¡¡not
tell¡¡us¡¡to¡¡love¡¡our¡¡neighbours£»¡¡she¡¡tells¡¡us¡¡to¡¡be¡¡our¡¡neighbours¡£¡¡
That¡¡is¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Besant's¡¡thoughtful¡¡and¡¡suggestive¡¡description¡¡of
the¡¡religion¡¡in¡¡which¡¡all¡¡men¡¡must¡¡find¡¡themselves¡¡in¡¡agreement¡£¡¡
And¡¡I¡¡never¡¡heard¡¡of¡¡any¡¡suggestion¡¡in¡¡my¡¡life¡¡with¡¡which¡¡I¡¡more
violently¡¡disagree¡£¡¡¡¡I¡¡want¡¡to¡¡love¡¡my¡¡neighbour¡¡not¡¡because¡¡he¡¡is¡¡I£»
but¡¡precisely¡¡because¡¡he¡¡is¡¡not¡¡I¡£¡¡I¡¡want¡¡to¡¡adore¡¡the¡¡world£»
not¡¡as¡¡one¡¡likes¡¡a¡¡looking¡glass£»¡¡because¡¡it¡¡is¡¡one's¡¡self£»
but¡¡as¡¡one¡¡loves¡¡a¡¡woman£»¡¡because¡¡she¡¡is¡¡entirely¡¡different¡£¡¡
If¡¡souls¡¡are¡¡separate¡¡love¡¡is¡¡possible¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡souls¡¡are¡¡united¡¡love
is¡¡obviously¡¡impossible¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡man¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said¡¡loosely¡¡to¡¡love¡¡himself£»
but¡¡he¡¡can¡¡hardly¡¡fall¡¡in¡¡love¡¡with¡¡himself£»¡¡or£»¡¡if¡¡he¡¡does£»¡¡it¡¡must
be¡¡a¡¡monotonous¡¡courtship¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡world¡¡is¡¡full¡¡of¡¡real¡¡selves£»
they¡¡can¡¡be¡¡really¡¡unselfish¡¡selves¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡upon¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡Besant's¡¡principle
the¡¡whole¡¡cosmos¡¡is¡¡only¡¡one¡¡enormously¡¡selfish¡¡person¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡just¡¡here¡¡that¡¡Buddhism¡¡is¡¡on¡¡the¡¡side¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡pantheism
and¡¡immanence¡£¡¡¡¡And¡¡it¡¡is¡¡just¡¡here¡¡that¡¡Christianity¡¡is¡¡on¡¡the
side¡¡of¡¡humanity¡¡and¡¡liberty¡¡and¡¡love¡£¡¡¡¡Love¡¡desires¡¡personality£»
therefore¡¡love¡¡desires¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡the¡¡instinct¡¡of¡¡Christianity
to¡¡be¡¡glad¡¡that¡¡God¡¡has¡¡broken¡¡the¡¡universe¡¡into¡¡little¡¡pieces£»
because¡¡they¡¡are¡¡living¡¡pieces¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡her¡¡instinct¡¡to¡¡say¡¡¡¨little
children¡¡love¡¡one¡¡another¡¨¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡to¡¡tell¡¡one¡¡large¡¡person
to¡¡love¡¡himself¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡intellectual¡¡abyss¡¡between¡¡Buddhism
and¡¡Christianity£»¡¡that¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Buddhist¡¡or¡¡Theosophist¡¡personality
is¡¡the¡¡fall¡¡of¡¡man£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡it¡¡is¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡God£»
the¡¡whole¡¡point¡¡of¡¡his¡¡cosmic¡¡idea¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡world¡soul¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Theosophists
asks¡¡man¡¡to¡¡love¡¡it¡¡only¡¡in¡¡order¡¡that¡¡man¡¡may¡¡throw¡¡himself¡¡into¡¡it¡£¡¡
But¡¡the¡¡divine¡¡centre¡¡of¡¡Christianity¡¡actually¡¡threw¡¡man¡¡out¡¡of¡¡it
in¡¡order¡¡that¡¡he¡¡might¡¡love¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡oriental¡¡deity¡¡is¡¡like¡¡a¡¡giant
who¡¡should¡¡have¡¡lost¡¡his¡¡leg¡¡or¡¡hand¡¡and¡¡be¡¡always¡¡seeking¡¡to¡¡find¡¡it£»
but¡¡the¡¡Christian¡¡power¡¡is¡¡like¡¡some¡¡giant¡¡who¡¡in¡¡a¡¡strange
generosity¡¡should¡¡cut¡¡off¡¡his¡¡right¡¡hand£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡it¡¡might¡¡of¡¡its
own¡¡accord¡¡shake¡¡hands¡¡with¡¡him¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡come¡¡back¡¡to¡¡the¡¡same¡¡tireless
note¡¡touching¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡Christianity£»¡¡all¡¡modern¡¡philosophies
are¡¡chains¡¡which¡¡connect¡¡and¡¡fetter£»¡¡Christianity¡¡is¡¡a¡¡sword¡¡which
separates¡¡and¡¡sets¡¡free¡£¡¡¡¡No¡¡other¡¡philosophy¡¡makes¡¡God¡¡actually
rejoice¡¡in¡¡the¡¡separation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡universe¡¡into¡¡living¡¡souls¡£¡¡
But¡¡according¡¡to¡¡orthodox¡¡Christianity¡¡this¡¡separation¡¡between¡¡God
and¡¡man¡¡is¡¡sacred£»¡¡because¡¡this¡¡is¡¡eternal¡£¡¡¡¡That¡¡a¡¡man¡¡may¡¡love¡¡God
it¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡that¡¡there¡¡should¡¡be¡¡not¡¡only¡¡a¡¡God¡¡to¡¡be¡¡loved£»
but¡¡a¡¡man¡¡to¡¡love¡¡him¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡those¡¡vague¡¡theosophical¡¡minds¡¡for¡¡whom
the¡¡universe¡¡is¡¡an¡¡immense¡¡melting¡pot¡¡are¡¡exactly¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡which
shrink¡¡instinctively¡¡from¡¡that¡¡earthquake¡¡saying¡¡of¡¡our¡¡Gospels£»
which¡¡declare¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Son¡¡of¡¡God¡¡came¡¡not¡¡with¡¡peace¡¡but¡¡with¡¡a
sundering¡¡sword¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡saying¡¡rings¡¡entirely¡¡true¡¡even¡¡considered
as¡¡what¡¡it¡¡obviously¡¡is£»¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡that¡¡any¡¡man¡¡who¡¡preaches¡¡real
love¡¡is¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡beget¡¡hate¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡as¡¡true¡¡of¡¡democratic¡¡fraternity
as¡¡a¡¡divine¡¡love£»¡¡sham¡¡love¡¡ends¡¡in¡¡compromise¡¡and¡¡common¡¡philosophy£»
but¡¡real¡¡love¡¡has¡¡always¡¡ended¡¡in¡¡bloodshed¡£¡¡¡¡Yet¡¡there¡¡is¡¡another
and¡¡yet¡¡more¡¡awful¡¡truth¡¡behind¡¡the¡¡obvious¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡this¡¡utterance
of¡¡our¡¡Lord¡£¡¡¡¡According¡¡to¡¡Himself¡¡the¡¡Son¡¡was¡¡a¡¡sword¡¡separating
brother¡¡and¡¡brother¡¡that¡¡they¡¡should¡¡for¡¡an¡¡aeon¡¡hate¡¡each¡¡other¡£¡¡
But¡¡the¡¡Father¡¡also¡¡was¡¡a¡¡sword£»¡¡which¡¡in¡¡the¡¡black¡¡beginning
separated¡¡brother¡¡and¡¡brother£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡they¡¡should¡¡love¡¡each¡¡other
at¡¡last¡£
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡that¡¡almost¡¡insane¡¡happiness¡¡in¡¡the
eyes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mediaeval¡¡saint¡¡in¡¡the¡¡picture¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡the¡¡meaning
of¡¡the¡¡sealed¡¡eyes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡superb¡¡Buddhist¡¡image¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Christian
saint¡¡is¡¡happy¡¡because¡¡he¡¡has¡¡verily¡¡been¡¡cut¡¡off¡¡from¡¡the¡¡world£»
he¡¡is¡¡separate¡¡from¡¡things¡¡and¡¡is¡¡staring¡¡at¡¡them¡¡in¡¡astonishment¡£¡¡
But¡¡why¡¡should¡¡the¡¡Buddhist¡¡saint¡¡be¡¡astonished¡¡at¡¡things£¿
since¡¡there¡¡is¡¡really¡¡only¡¡one¡¡thing£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡being¡¡impersonal¡¡can
hardly¡¡be¡¡astonished¡¡at¡¡itself¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡have¡¡been¡¡many¡¡pantheist¡¡poems
suggesting¡¡wonder£»¡¡but¡¡no¡¡really¡¡successful¡¡ones¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡pantheist
cannot¡¡wonder£»¡¡for¡¡he¡¡cannot¡¡praise¡¡God¡¡or¡¡praise¡¡anything¡¡as¡¡really
distinct¡¡from¡¡himself¡£¡¡¡¡Our¡¡immediate¡¡business¡¡here£»¡¡however£»¡¡is¡¡with
the¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡this¡¡Christian¡¡admiration¡¡£¨which¡¡strikes¡¡outwards£»
towards¡¡a¡¡deity¡¡distinct¡¡from¡¡the¡¡worshipper£©¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡general
need¡¡for¡¡ethical¡¡activity¡¡and¡¡social¡¡reform¡£¡¡¡¡And¡¡surely¡¡its
effect¡¡is¡¡sufficiently¡¡obvious¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡is¡¡no¡¡real¡¡possibility
of¡¡getting¡¡out¡¡of¡¡pantheism£»¡¡any¡¡special¡¡impulse¡¡to¡¡moral¡¡action¡£¡¡
For¡¡pantheism¡¡implies¡¡in¡¡its¡¡nature¡¡that¡¡one¡¡thing¡¡is¡¡as¡¡good
as¡¡another£»¡¡whereas¡¡action¡¡implies¡¡in¡¡its¡¡nature¡¡that¡¡one¡¡thing
is¡¡greatly¡¡preferable¡¡to¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡Swinburne¡¡in¡¡the¡¡high¡¡summer
of¡¡his¡¡scepticism¡¡tried¡¡in¡¡vain¡¡to¡¡wrestle¡¡with¡¡this¡¡difficulty¡£¡¡
In¡¡¡¨Songs¡¡before¡¡Sun