medical essays-第23章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ged with an atmosphere of infection； which was communicated to every pregnant woman who happened to come within its sphere。 This is not an assertion； but a fact； admitting of demonstration； as may be seen by a perusal of the foregoing table；〃referring to a table of seventy…seven cases； in many of which the channel of propagation was evident。
He adds； 〃It is a disagreeable declaration for me to mention； that I myself was the means of carrying the infection to a great number of women。〃 He then enumerates a number of instances in which the disease was conveyed by midwives and others to the neighboring villages； and declares that 〃these facts fully prove that the cause of the puerperal fever； of which I treat； was a specific contagion； or infection； altogether unconnected with a noxious constitution of the atmosphere。〃
But his most terrible evidence is given in these words： 〃I ARRIVED AT THAT CERTAINTY IN THE MATTER； THAT I COULD VENTURE TO FORETELL WHAT WOMEN WOULD BE AFFECTED WITH THE DISEASE； UPON HEARING BY WHAT MIDWIFE THEY WERE TO BE DELIVERED； OR BY WHAT NURSE THEY WERE TO BE ATTENDED； DURING THEIR LYING…IN： AND ALMOST IN EVERY INSTANCE； MY PREDICTION WAS VERIFIED。〃
Even previously to Gordon； Mr。 White of Manchester had said； 〃I am acquainted with two gentlemen in another town； where the whole business of midwifery is divided betwixt them； and it is very remarkable that one of them loses several patients every year of the puerperal fever； and the other never so much as meets with the disorder；〃a difference which he seems to attribute to their various modes of treatment。 ＇On the Management of Lying…in Women； p。 120。＇
Dr。 Armstrong has given a number of instances in his Essay on Puerperal Fever； of the prevalence of the disease among the patients of a single practitioner。 At Sunderland； 〃in all； forty…three cases occurred from the 1st of January to the 1st of October； when the disease ceased； and of this number forty were witnessed by Mr。 Gregson and his assistant； Mr。 Gregory； the remainder having been separately seen by three accoucheurs。〃 There is appended to the London edition of this Essay； a letter from Mr。 Gregson； in which that gentleman says； in reference to the great number of cases occurring in his practice； 〃The cause of this I cannot pretend fully to explain； but I should be wanting in common liberality if I were to make any hesitation in asserting； that the disease which appeared in my practice was highly contagious； and communicable from one puerperal woman to another。〃 〃It is customary among the lower and middle ranks of people to make frequent personal visits to puerperal women resident in the same neighborhood； and I have ample evidence for affirming that the infection of the disease was often carried about in that manner； and； however painful to my feelings； I must in candor declare； that it is very probable the contagion was conveyed； in some instances； by myself； though I took every possible care to prevent such a thing from happening； the moment that I ascertained that the distemper was infectious。〃 Dr。 Armstrong goes on to mention six other instances within his knowledge； in which the disease had at different times and places been limited； in the same singular manner； to the practice of individuals； while it existed scarcely if at all among the patients of others around them。 Two of the gentlemen became so convinced of their conveying the contagion； that they withdrew for a time from practice。
I find a brief notice； in an American Journal； of another series of cases； first mentioned by Mr。 Davies； in the 〃Medical Repository。〃 This gentleman stated his conviction that the disease is contagious。
〃In the autumn of 1822 he met with twelve cases； while his medical friends in the neighborhood did not meet with any； ' or at least very few。' He could attribute this circumstance to no other cause than his having been present at the examination； after death； of two cases； some time previous； and of his having imparted the disease to his patients； notwithstanding every precaution。'〃
Dr。 Gooch says； 〃It is not uncommon for the greater number of cases to occur in the practice of one man； whilst the other practitioners of the neighborhood； who are not more skilful or more busy； meet with few or none。 A practitioner opened the body of a woman who had died of puerperal fever； and continued to wear the same clothes。 A lady whom he delivered a few days afterwards was attacked with and died of a similar disease； two more of his lying…in patients； in rapid succession； met with the same fate； struck by the thought； that he might have carried contagion in his clothes； he instantly changed them； and met with no more cases of the kind。' A woman in the country； who was employed as washerwoman and nurse； washed the linen of one who had died of puerperal fever； the next lying…in patient she nursed died of the same disease； a third nursed by her met with the same fate； till the neighborhood； getting afraid of her； ceased to employ her。〃
In the winter of the year 1824； 〃Several instances occurred of its prevalence among the patients of particular practitioners； whilst others who were equally busy met with few or none。 One instance of this kind was very remarkable。 A general practitioner； in large midwifery practice； lost so many patients from puerperal fever； that he determined to deliver no more for some time； but that his partner should attend in his place。 This plan was pursued for one month； during which not a case of the disease occurred in their practice。 The elder practitioner； being then sufficiently recovered； returned to his practice； but the first patient he attended was attacked by the disease and died。 A physician； who met him in consultation soon afterwards； about a case of a different kind； and who knew nothing of his misfortune； asked him whether puerperal fever was at all prevalent in his neighborhood； on which he burst into tears； and related the above circumstances。
〃Among the cases which I saw this season in consultation； four occurred in one month in the practice of one medical man； and all of them terminated fatally。〃 ＇Lond。 Med。 Gaz。 May 2； 1835。＇
Dr。 Ramsbotham asserted； in a Lecture at the London Hospital； that he had known the disease spread through a particular district； or be confined to the practice of a particular person； almost every patient being attacked with it； while others had not a single case。 It seemed capable； he thought； of conveyance； not only by common modes； but through the dress of the attendants upon the patient。
In a letter to be found in the 〃London Medical Gazette〃for January； 1840； Mr。 Roberton of Manchester makes the statement which I here give in a somewhat condensed form。
A midwife delivered a woman on the 4th of December； 1830； who died soon after with the symptoms of puerperal fever。 In one month from this date the same midwife delivered thirty women； residing in different parts of an extensive suburb； of which number sixteen caught the disease and all died。 These were the only cases which had occurred for a considerable time in Manchester。 The other midwives connected with the same charitable institution as the woman already mentioned are twenty…five in number； and deliver； on an average； ninety women a week； or about three hundred and eighty a month。 None of these women had a case of puerperal fever。 〃Yet all this time this woman was crossing the other midwives in every direction； scores of the patients of the charity being delivered by them in the very same quarters where her cases of fever were happening。〃
Mr。 Roberton remarks； that little more than half the women she delivered during this month took the fever； that on some days all escaped； on others only one or more out of three or four； a circumstance similar to what is seen in other infectious maladies。
Dr。 Blundell says； 〃Those who have never made the experiment can have but a faint conception how difficult it is to obtain the exact truth respecting any occurrence in which feelings and interests are concerned。 Omitting particulars； then； I content myself with remarking； generally； that from more than one district I have received accounts of the prevalence of puerperal fever in the practice of some individuals； while its occurrence in that of others； in the same neighborhood； was not observed。 Some； as I have been told； have lost ten； twelve； or a greater number of patients； in scarcely broken succession； like their evil genius； the puerperal fever has seemed to stalk behind them wherever they went。 Some have deemed it prudent to retire for a time from practice。 In fine； that this fever may occur spontaneously； I admit； that its infectious nature may be plausibly disputed； I do not deny； but I add； considerately； that in my own family I had rather that those I esteemed the most should be delivered； unaided； in a stable； by the manger…side； than that they should receive the best help； in the fairest apartment； but exposed to the vapors of this pitiless disease。 Gossiping friends； wet…nurses； monthly nurses； the practitioner himself； these are the channels by which； as I suspect； the infection is principally conveyed。〃
At a meeting of the Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society； Dr。 King mentioned that some years since a practitioner at Woolwich lost sixteen patients from puerperal fever in the same year。 He was compelled to give up practice for one or two years； his business being divided among the neighboring practitioners。 No case of puerperal fever occurred afterwards； neither had any of the neighboring surgeons any cases of this disease。
At the same meeting Mr。 Hutchinson mentioned the occurrence of three consecutive cases of puerperal fever； followed subsequently by two others； all in the practice of one accoucheur。＇Lancet； May 2； 1840。＇
Dr。 Lee makes the following statement： 〃In the last two weeks of September； 1827； five fatal cases of uterine inflammation came under our observation。 All the individuals so attacked had been attended in labor by the same midwife； and no example of a febrile or inflammatory disease of a serious nature occurred during that period among the other patients of the Westminster General Dispensary； who had been attended by the other midwives belonging to that institution。〃
The recurrence of long series of cases like those I have cited； reported by those most interested to disbelieve in contagion； scattered along through an interval of half a century； might have been thought sufficient to satisfy the minds of all inquirers that here was something more than a singular coincidence。 But if； on a more extended observation； it should be found that the same ominous groups of cases clustering about individual practitioners were observed in a remote country； at different times； and in widely separated regions； it would seem incredible that any should be found too prejudiced or indolent to accept the solemn truth knelled into their ears by the funeral bells from both sides of the ocean；the plain conclusion that the physician and the disease entered； hand in hand； into the chamber of the unsuspecting patient。
That such series of cases have been observed in this country； and in this neighborhood； I proceed to show。
In Dr。 Francis'
