list4-第2章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！





introduce　a　protective　system；　or　the　Germans　to　establish　a



customs　union。　People　would　have　come　to　the　determination　with



difficulty　to　sacrifice　the　advantages　of　the　present　moment　to　the



hopes　of　a　distant　future。



　　　　But　Providence　has　taken　care　that　trees　should　not　grow　quite



up　to　the　sky。　Lord　Castlereagh　gave　over　the　commercial　policy　of



England　into　the　hands　of　the　landed　aristocracy；　and　these　killed



the　hen　which　had　laid　the　golden　eggs。　Had　they　permitted　the



English　manufactures　to　monopolise　the　markets　of　all　nations；



Great　Britain　would　have　occupied　the　position　in　respect　to　the



world　which　a　manufacturing　town　does　in　respect　to　the　open



country；　the　whole　territory　of　the　island　of　England　would　have



been　covered　with　houses　and　manufactories；　or　devoted　to　pleasure



gardens；　vegetable　gardens；　and　orchards；　to　the　production　of　milk



and　of　meat；　or　of　the　cultivation　of　market　produce；　and　generally



to　such　cultivation　as　only　can　be　carried　on　in　the　neighbourhood



of　great　cities。　The　production　of　these　things　would　have　become



much　more　lucrative　for　English　agriculture　than　the　production　of



corn；　and　consequently　after　a　time　the　English　landed　aristocracy



would　have　obtained　much　higher　rents　than　by　the　exclusion　of



foreign　grain　from　the　home　market。　Only；　the　landed　aristocracy



having　only　their　present　interests　in　view；　preferred　by　means　of



the　corn　laws　to　maintain　their　rents　at　the　high　rate　to　which



they　had　been　raised　by　the　involuntary　exclusion　of　foreign　raw



materials　and　grain　from　the　English　market　which　had　been



occasioned　by　the　war；　and　thus　they　compelled　the　nations　of　the



Continent　to　seek　to　promote　their　own　welfare　by　another　method



than　by　the　free　exchange　of　agricultural　produce　for　English



manufactures；　viz。　By　the　method　of　establishing　a　manufacturing



power　of　their　own。　The　English　restrictive　laws　thus　operated



quite　in　the　same　way　as　Napoleon's　Continental　system　had　done；



only　their　operation　was　somewhat　slower。



　　　　When　Canning　and　Huskisson　came　into　office；　the　landed



aristocracy　had　already　tasted　too　much　of　the　forbidden　fruit　for



it　to　be　possible　to　induce　them　by　reasons　of　common　sense　to



renounce　what　they　had　enjoyed。　These　statesmen　found　themselves　in



the　difficult　position　of　solving　an　impossible　problem　　a



position　in　which　the　English　ministry　still　finds　itself。　They　had



at　one　and　the　same　time　to　convince　the　Continental　nations　of　the



advantages　of　free　trade；　and　also　maintain　the　restrictions　on　the



import　of　foreign　agricultural　produce　for　the　benefit　of　the



English　landed　aristocracy。　Hence　it　was　impossible　that　their



system　could　be　developed　in　such　a　manner　that　justice　could　be



done　to　the　hopes　of　the　advocates　of　free　trade　on　both



continents。　With　all　their　liberality　with　philanthropical　and



cosmopolitical　phrases　which　they　uttered　in　general　discussions



respecting　the　commercial　systems　of　England　and　other　countries；



they　nevertheless　did　not　think　it　inconsistent；　whenever　the



question　arose　of　the　alteration　of　any　particular　English　duties；



to　base　their　arguments　on　the　principle　of　protection。



　　　　Huskisson　certainly　reduced　the　duties　on　several　articles；　but



he　never　omitted　to　take　care　that　at　that　lower　scale　of　duty　the



home　manufactories　were　still　sufficiently　protected。　He　thus



followed　pretty　much　the　rules　of　the　Dutch　water　administration。



Wherever　the　water　on　the　outside　rises　high；　these　wise



authorities　erect　high　dykes；　wherever　it　rises　less；　they　only



build　lower　dykes。　After　such　a　fashion　the　reform　of　the　English



commercial　policy　which　was　announced　with　so　much　pomp　reduced



itself　to　a　piece　of　mere　politico…economical　jugglery。　Some



persons　have　adduced　the　lowering　of　the　English　duty　on　silk　goods



as　a　piece　of　English　liberality；　without　duly　considering　that



England　by　that　means　only　sought　to　discourage　contraband　trade　in



these　articles　to　the　benefit　of　her　finances　and　without　injury　to



her　own　silk　manufactories；　which　object　it　has　also　by　that　means



perfectly　attained。　But　if　a　protective　duty　of　50　to　70　per　cent



（which　at　this　day　foreign　silk　manufacturers　have　to　pay　in



England；　including　the　extra　duty（3*））　is　to　be　accepted　as　a　proof



of　liberality　most　nations　may　claim　that　they　have　rather　preceded



the　English　in　that　respect　than　followed　them。



　　　　As　the　demonstrations　of　Canning　and　Huskisson　were　specially



intended　to　produce　an　effect　in　France　and　North　America；　it　will



not　be　uninteresting　to　call　to　mind　in　what　way　it　was　that　they



suffered　shipwreck　in　both　countries。　Just　as　formerly　in　the　year



1786；　so　also　on　this　occasion；　the　English　received　great　support



from　the　theorists；　and　the　liberal　party　in　France；　carried　away



by　the　grand　idea　of　universal　freedom　of　trade　and　by　Say's



superficial　arguments；　and　from　feelings　of　opposition　towards　a



detested　Government　and　supported　by　the　maritime　towns；　the　wine



growers；　and　the　silk　manufacturers；　the　liberal　party　clamorously



demanded；　as　they　had　done　in　the　year　1786；　extension　of　the　trade



with　England　as　the　one　true　method　of　promoting　the　national



welfare。



　　　　For　whatever　faults　people　may　lay　to　the　charge　of　the



Restoration；　it　rendered　an　undeniable　service　to　France；　a　service



which　posterity　will　not　dispute；　it　did　not　allow　itself　to　be



misled　into　a　false　step　as　respects　commercial　policy　either　by



the　stratagems　of　the　English　or　by　the　outcry　of　the　liberals。　Mr



Canning　laid　this　business　so　much　to　heart　that　he　himself　made　a



journey　to　Paris　in　order　to　convince　Monsieur　Vill鑜e　of　the



excellence　of　his　measures；　and　to　induce　him　to　imitate　them。　M。



Vill鑜e　was；　however；　much　too　practical　not　to　see　completely



through　this　stratagem；　he　is　said　to　have　replied　to　Mr　Canning；



'If　England　in　the　far　advanced　position　of　her　industry　permits



greater　foreign　competition　than　formerly；　that　policy　corresponds



to　England's　own　well…understood　interests。　But　at　this　time　it　is



to　the　well…understood　interests　of　France　that　she　should　secure



to　her　manufactories　which　have　not　as　yet　attained　perfect



development；　that　protection　which　is　at　present　indispensable　to



them　for　that　object。　But　whenever　the　moment　shall　have　arrived



when　French　manufacturing　industry　can　be　better　promoted　by



permitting　foreign　competition　than　by　restricting　it；　then　he　（M。



Vill鑜e）　would　not　delay　to　derive　advantage　from　following　the



example　of　Mr　Canning。'



　　　　Annoyed　by　this　conclusive　answer；　Canning　boasted　in　open



Parliament　after　his　return；　how　he　had　hung　a　millstone　on　the



neck　of　the　French　Government　by　means　of　the　Spanish　intervention；



from　which　it　follows　that　the　cosmopolitan　sentiments　and　the



European　liberalism　of　Mr　Canning　were　not　spoken　quite　so　much　in



earnest　as　the　good　liberals　on　the　Continent　might　have　chosen　to



believe。　For　how　could　Mr　Canning；　if　the　cause　of　liberalism　on



the　Continent　had　interested　him　in　the　least；　have　sacrificed　the



liberal　constitution　of　Spain　to　the　French　intervention　owing　to



the　mere　desire　to　hang　a　millstone　round　the　neck　of　the　French



Government？　The　truth　is；　that　Mr　Canning　was　every　inch　an



Englishman；　and　he　only　permitted　himself　to　entertain



philanthropical　or　cosmopolitical　sentiments；　when　they　could　prove



serviceable　to　him　in　strengthening　and　still　further　extending　the



industry　and　commercial　supremacy　of　England；　or　in　throwing　dust



into　the　eyes　of　England's　rivals　in　industry　and　commerce。



　　　　In　fact；　no　great　sagacity　was　needed　on　the　part　of　M。　Vill鑜e



to　perceive　the　snare　which　had　been　laid　for　him　by　Mr　Canning。　In



the　experience　of　neighbouring　Germany；　who　after　the　abolition　of



the　Continental　system　had　continually　retrograded　farther　and



farther　in　respect　of　her　industry；　M。　Vill鑜e　possessed　a　striking



proof　of　the　true　value　of　the　principle　of　commercial　freedom　as



it　was　understood　in　England。　Also　France　was　prospering　too　well



under　the　system　which　she　had　adopted　since　1815；　for　her　to　be



willing　to　attempt；　like　the　dog　in　the　fable；　to　let　go　the



substance　and　snap　at　the　shadow。　Men　of　the　deepest　insight　into



the　condition　of　industry；　such　as　Chaptal　and　Charles　Dupin；　had



expressed　themselves　on　the　results　of　this　system　in　the　most



unequivocal　manner。



　　　　Chaptal's　work　on　French　industry　is　nothing　less　than　a



defence　of　the　French　commercial　policy；　and　an　exposition　of　its



results　as　a　whole　and　in　every　particular。　The　tendency　of　this



work　is　expressed　in　the　following　quotation　from　it。　'Instead　of



losing　ourselves　in　the　labyrinth　of　metaphysical　abstractions；　we



maintain　above　all　that　which　exists；　and　seek　above　all　to　make　it



perfect。　Good　customs　legislation　is　the　bulwark　of　manufacturing



industry。　It　increases　or　lessens　import　duties　according　to



circumstances；　it　compensates　the　disadvantages　of　higher　wages　of



labour　and　of　higher　prices　of　fuel；　it　protects　arts　and



industries　in　their　cradle　until　they　at　length　become　strong



enough　to　bear　foreign　competition；　it　creates　the　industrial



independence　of　France　and　enriches　the　nation　through　labour；



which；　as　I　have　already　often　remarked；　is　the　chief　source　of



wealth。'（4*）



　　　　Charles　Dupin　had；　in　his　work　'On　the　Productive　Powers　of



France；　and　on　the　Progress　of　French　Industry　from　1814　to　1847；'



thrown　such　a　clear　light　on　the　results　of　the　commercial　policy



which　France　had　followed　since　the　Restoration；　that　it　was



impossible　that　a　French　minister　could　think　of　sacrificing　this



work　of　half　a　century；　which　had　cost　such　sacrifices；　which　was



so　rich　in　fruits；　and　so　full　of　promise　for　the　future；　merely



for　the　attractions　of　a　Methuen　Treaty。



　　　　The　American　tariff　for　the　year　1828　was　a　natural　and



necessary　result　of　the　English　commercial　system；　which　shut　out



from　the　English　frontiers　the　North　American　timber；　grain；　meal；



and　other　agricultural　products；　and　only　permitted　raw　cotton　to



be　received　by　England　in　exchange　for　her　manufactured　goods。　On



this　system　the　trade　with　England　only　tended　to　promote　the



agricultural　labour　of　the　American　slaves；　while　on　the　other



hand；　the　freest；　most　enl