the crowd-第29章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ely typical on this score： 〃The decisions with which we have been so reproached；〃 he says； 〃WERE NOT DESIRED BY US TWO DAYS； A SINGLE DAY BEFORE THEY WERE TAKEN： IT WAS THE CRISIS AND NOTHING ELSE THAT GAVE RISE TO THEM。〃 Nothing can be more accurate。
The same phenomena of unconsciousness were to be witnessed during all the stormy sittings of the Convention。
〃They approved and decreed measures；〃 says Taine； 〃which they held in horrormeasures which were not only stupid and foolish； but measures that were crimesthe murder of innocent men； the murder of their friends。 The Left； supported by the Right； unanimously and amid loud applause； sent to the scaffold Danton； its natural chief； and the great promoter and leader of the Revolution。 Unanimously and amid the greatest applause the Right； supported by the Left； votes the worst decrees of the revolutionary government。 Unanimously and amid cries of admiration and enthusiasm； amid demonstrations of passionate sympathy for Collot d'Herbois； Couthon； and Robespierre； the Convention by spontaneous and repeated re…elections keeps in office the homicidal government which the Plain detests because it is homicidal； and the Mountain detests because it is decimated by it。 The Plain and the Mountain； the majority and the minority； finish by consenting to help on their own suicide。 The 22 Prairial the entire Convention offered itself to the executioner； the 8 Thermidor； during the first quarter of an hour that followed Robespierre's speech； it did the same thing again。〃
This picture may appear sombre。 Yet it is accurate。 Parliamentary assemblies； sufficiently excited and hypnotised； offer the same characteristics。 They become an unstable flock； obedient to every impulsion。 The following description of the Assembly of 1848 is due to M。 Spuller； a parliamentarian whose faith in democracy is above suspicion。 I reproduce it from the Revue litteraire； and it is thoroughly typical。 It offers an example of all the exaggerated sentiments which I have described as characteristic of crowds； and of that excessive changeableness which permits of assemblies passing； from moment to moment； from one set of sentiments to another entirely opposite。
〃The Republican party was brought to its perdition by its divisions； its jealousies； its suspicions； and； in turn； its blind confidence and its limitless hopes。 Its ingenuousness and candour were only equalled by its universal mistrust。 An absence of all sense of legality； of all comprehension of discipline； together with boundless terrors and illusions； the peasant and the child are on a level in these respects。 Their calm is as great as their impatience； their ferocity is equal to their docility。 This condition is the natural consequence of a temperament that is not formed and of the lack of education。 Nothing astonishes such persons； and everything disconcerts them。 Trembling with fear or brave to the point of heroism； they would go through fire and water or fly from a shadow。
〃They are ignorant of cause and effect and of the connecting links between events。 They are as promptly discouraged as they are exalted； they are subject to every description of panic； they are always either too highly strung or too downcast； but never in the mood or the measure the situation would require。 More fluid than water they reflect every line and assume every shape。 What sort of a foundation for a government can they be expected to supply？〃
Fortunately all the characteristics just described as to be met with in parliamentary assemblies are in no wise constantly displayed。 Such assemblies only constitute crowds at certain moments。 The individuals composing them retain their individuality in a great number of cases； which explains how it is that an assembly is able to turn out excellent technical laws。 It is true that the author of these laws is a specialist who has prepared them in the quiet of his study； and that in reality the law voted is the work of an individual and not of an assembly。 These laws are naturally the best。 They are only liable to have disastrous results when a series of amendments has converted them into the outcome of a collective effort。 The work of a crowd is always inferior； whatever its nature； to that of an isolated individual。 It is specialists who safeguard assemblies from passing ill…advised or unworkable measures。 The specialist in this case is a temporary leader of crowds。 The Assembly is without influence on him； but he has influence over the Assembly。
In spite of all the difficulties attending their working； parliamentary assemblies are the best form of government mankind has discovered as yet； and more especially the best means it has found to escape the yoke of personal tyrannies。 They constitute assuredly the ideal government at any rate for philosophers； thinkers； writers； artists； and learned menin a word； for all those who form the cream of a civilisation。
Moreover； in reality they only present two serious dangers； one being inevitable financial waste； and the other the progressive restriction of the liberty of the individual。
The first of these dangers is the necessary consequence of the exigencies and want of foresight of electoral crowds。 Should a member of an assembly propose a measure giving apparent satisfaction to democratic ideas； should he bring in a Bill； for instance； to assure old…age pensions to all workers； and to increase the wages of any class of State employes； the other Deputies； victims of suggestion in their dread of their electors； will not venture to seem to disregard the interests of the latter by rejecting the proposed measure； although well aware they are imposing a fresh strain on the Budget and necessitating the creation of new taxes。 It is impossible for them to hesitate to give their votes。 The consequences of the increase of expenditure are remote and will not entail disagreeable consequences for them personally； while the consequences of a negative vote might clearly come to light when they next present themselves for re…election。
In addition to this first cause of an exaggerated expenditure there is another not less imperativethe necessity of voting all grants for local purposes。 A Deputy is unable to oppose grants of this kind because they represent once more the exigencies of the electors； and because each individual Deputy can only obtain what he requires for his own constituency on the condition of acceding to similar demands on the part of his colleagues。＇29＇
＇29＇ In its issue of April 6； 1895； the Economiste published a curious review of the figures that may be reached by expenditure caused solely by electoral considerations； and notably of the outlay on railways。 To put Langayes （a town of 3；000 inhabitants； situated on a mountain） in communication with Puy； a railway is voted that will cost 15 millions of francs。 Seven millions are to be spent to put Beaumont （3；500 inhabitants） in communication with Castel…Sarrazin； 7 millions to put Oust （a village of 523 inhabitants） in communication with Seix （1；200 inhabitants）； 6 millions to put Prade in communication with the hamlet of Olette （747 inhabitants）； &c。 In 1895 alone 90 millions of francs were voted for railways of only local utility。 There is other no less important expenditure necessitated also by electioneering considerations。 The law instituting workingmen's pensions will soon involve a minimum annual outlay of 165 millions； according to the Minister of Finance； and of 800 millions according to the academician M。 Leroy…Beaulieu。 It is evident that the continued growth of expenditure of this kind must end in bankruptcy。 Many European countriesPortugal； Greece； Spain； Turkeyhave reached this stage； and others； such as Italy； will soon be reduced to the same extremity。 Still too much alarm need not be felt at this state of things； since the public has successively consented to put up with the reduction of four…fifths in the payment of their coupons by these different countries。 Bankruptcy under these ingenious conditions allows the equilibrium of Budgets difficult to balance to be instantly restored。 Moreover； wars； socialism； and economic conflicts hold in store for us a profusion of other catastrophes in the period of universal disintegration we are traversing； and it is necessary to be resigned to living from hand to mouth without too much concern for a future we cannot control。
The second of the dangers referred to abovethe inevitable restrictions on liberty consummated by parliamentary assembliesis apparently less obvious； but is； nevertheless； very real。 It is the result of the innumerable lawshaving always a restrictive actionwhich parliaments consider themselves obliged to vote and to whose consequences； owing to their shortsightedness； they are in a great measure blind。
The danger must indeed be most inevitable； since even England itself； which assuredly offers the most popular type of the parliamentary regime； the type in which the representative is most independent of his elector； has been unable to escape it。 Herbert Spencer has shown； in a work already old； that the increase of apparent liberty must needs be followed by the decrease of real liberty。 Returning to this contention in his recent book； 〃The Individual versus the State；〃 he thus expresses himself with regard to the English Parliament：
〃Legislation since this period has followed the course； I pointed out。 Rapidly multiplying dictatorial measures have continually tended to restrict individual liberties； and this in two ways。 Regulations have been established every year in greater number； imposing a constraint on the citizen in matters in which his acts were formerly completely free； and forcing him to accomplish acts which he was formerly at liberty to accomplish or not to accomplish at will。 At the same time heavier and heavier public； and especially local； burdens have still further restricted his liberty by diminishing the portion of his profits he can spend as he chooses； and by augmenting the portion which is taken from him to be spent according to the good pleasure of the public authorities。〃
This progressive restriction of liberties shows itself in every country in a special shape which Herbert Spencer has not pointed out； it is that the passing of these innumerable series of legislative measures； all of them in a general way of a restrictive order； conduces necessarily to augment the number； the power； and the influence of the functionaries charged with their application。 These functionaries tend in this way to become the veritable masters of civilised countries。 Their power is all the greater owing to the fact that； amidst the incessant transfer of authority； the administrative caste is alone in being untouched by these changes； is alone in possessing irresponsibility； impersonality； and perpetuity。 There is no more oppressive despotism than that which presents itself under this triple form。
This incessant creation of restrictive laws and regulations； surrounding the pettiest actions of existence with the most complicated formalities； inevitably has for its result the confining within narrower and narrower limits of the sphere in which the citizen may move freely。 Victims of the del
