phenomenology of mind-及94嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
directly finds in this attitude universal certainty of itself as well�察�has its pure consciousness in this
attitude�察�in which truth as well as immediateness and actuality are united。 Both worlds are
reconciled and heaven is transplanted to the earth below。
1。 The outcome is at once positive and negative´materialism and agnosticism�此�on the secular side�察�it
is pure utilitarianism。
2。 Cp。 Schopenhauer�此 �The absolute without predicates is just matter。;
III
Absolute Freedom & Terror ��1��
CONSCIOUSNESS has found its notion in the principle of utility。 But that notion is partly an
object still�察�partly�察�for that very reason�察�still a purpose�察�of which consciousness does not yet find
itself to be immediately possessed。 Utility is still a predicate of the object�察�not a subject�察�not its
immediate and sole actuality。 It is the same thing that appeared before when we found that
self´existence ��being´for´self�� had not yet shown itself to be the substance of the remaining
moments�察�a process by which the useful would be directly nothing else than the self of
consciousness and this latter thereby in its possession。
This revocation of the form of objectivity which characterizes the useful has�察�however�察�already
taken effect implicitly�察�and as the outcome of this immanent internal revolution there comes to light
the actual revolution of concrete actuality�察�the new mode of conscious life´absolute freedom。
This is so because in point of f act there is here no more than an empty semblance of objectivity
separating self´consciousness from actual possession。 For�察�in part�察�all the validity and permanence
of the various specific members of the organization of the world of actuality and belief have as a
whole returned into this simple determination�察�as into their ground and their indwelling spirit�此�in
part�察�however�察�this organized world has nothing peculiarly its own left for itself�察�it is instead pure
metaphysics pure notion or knowledge of self´consciousness。 That is to say�察�from the whole and
complete being of the useful qua object consciousness recognizes that its inherent nature�察�its
being´in´itself�察�is essentially a being for another�察�mere being´in´itself since it is self´less�察�is ultimately
and in truth a passive entity�察�or something that is for another self。 The object�察�however�察�is present
to consciousness in this abstract form of purely inherent being�察�of pure being´in´itself�察�for
consciousness is the activity of pure insight�察�the separate moments of which take the pure form of
notions。
Self´existence�察�being´for´self�察�however�察�into which being for another returns�察�in other words the
self�察�is not a self of what is called object�察�a self all its own and different from the ego�此�for
consciousness qua pure insight is not an individual self�察�over against which the object�察�in the sense
of having a self all its own�察�could stand�察�but the pure notion�察�the gazing of the self into self�察�the
literal and absolute seeing itself doubled。 The certainty of itself is the universal subject�察�and its
notion knowing itself is the essential being of all reality。 If the useful was merely the shifting change
of the moments�察�without returning into its own proper unity�察�and was still hence an object for
knowledge to deal with�察�then it ceases to be this now。 For knowing is itself the process and
movement of those abstract moments�察�it is the universal self�察�the self of itself as well as of the
object�察�and�察�being universal�察�is the unity of this process�察�a unity that returns into itself。
This brings on the scene spirit in the form of absolute freedom。 It is the mode of self´consciousness
which clearly comprehends that in its certainty of self lies the essence of all the component spiritual
spheres of the concrete sensible as well as of the supersensible world�察�or�察�conversely�察�that
essential being and concrete actuality consist in the knowledge consciousness has of itself。
It is conscious of its pure personality and with that of all spiritual reality�察�and all reality is solely
spirituality�察�the world is for it absolutely its own will�察�and this will is universal will。 And further�察�this
will is not the empty thought of will�察�which is constituted by giving a silent assent�察�or an assent
through a representative�察�a mere symbol of willing�察�it is concretely embodied universal will�察�the will
of all individuals as such。 For will is in itself the consciousness of personality�察�of every single one��
and it has to be as this true concrete actual as self´conscious essential being of each and every
personality�察�so that each single and undivided does everything�察�and what appears as done by the
whole is at once and consciously the deed of every single individual。
This undivided substance of absolute freedom puts itself on the throne of the world�察�without any
power being able to offer effectual resistance。 For since in very truth consciousness is alone the
element which furnishes spiritual beings or powers with their substance�察�their entire system�察�which
is organized and maintained through division into separate spheres and distinct wholes�察�has
collapsed into a single whole�察�when once the individual consciousness conceives the object as
having no other nature than that of self´consciousness itself�察�or conceives it to be absolutely the
notion。 What made the notion an existential object was the distinguishing it into separate and
separately subsisting spheres�察�when�察�however�察�the object becomes a notion there is nothing fixedly
subsisting left in it�察�negativity has pervaded all its moments。 It exists in such a way that each
individual consciousness rises out of the sphere assigned to it�察�finds no longer its inmost nature and
function in this isolated area�察�but grasps itself as the notion of will�察�grasps all the various spheres as
the essential expression of this will�察�and is in consequence only able to realize itself in a work which
is a work of the whole。 In this absolute freedom all social ranks or classes�察�which are the
component spiritual factors into which the whole is differentiated�察�are effaced and annulled�察�the
individual consciousness that belonged to any such group and exercised its will and found its
fulfilment there�察�has removed the barriers confining it�察�its purpose is the universal purpose�察�its
language universal law�察�its work universal achievement。
The object and the element distinguished have here lost the meaning of utility�察�which was a
predicate of all real being�察�consciousness does not commence its process with the object as a sort
of alien element after dealing with which it then and only then returns into itself �察�the object is for it
consciousness itself。 The opposition thus consists solely in the distinction of individual and universal
consciousness。 But the individual itself is directly on its own view that which had merely the
semblance of opposition�察�it is universal consciousness and will。 The remote beyond that lies remote
from this its actual reality�察�hovers over the corpse of the vanished independence of what is real or
believed to be�察�and hovers there merely as an exhalation of stale gas�察�of the empty ┷tre supr┷me。
By doing�察�away with the various distinct spiritual spheres�察�and the restricted and confined life of
individuals�察�as well as both its worlds�察�there thus remains merely the process of the universal
self´consciousness within itselfa process which consists in a reciprocal interaction between its
universal form and personal consciousness。 The universal will goes into itself�察�is subjectivized�察�and
becomes individual will�察�to which the universal law and universal work stand opposed。 But this
individual consciousness is equally and immediately conscious of itself as universal will�察�it is fully
aware that its object is a law given by that will�察�a work performed by that will�察�in exercising and
carrying out its activity�察�in creating objectivity�察�it is thus doing nothing individual�察�but executing laws
and functions of the state。
This process is consequently the interaction of consciousness with itself�察�in which it lets nothing
break away and assume the shape of a detached object standing over against it。 It follows from
this�察�that it cannot arrive at a positive accomplishment of anything�察�either in the way of universal
works of language or of those of actual reality�察�either in the shape of laws and universal regulations
of conscious freedom�察�or of deeds and works of active freedom。
The accomplished result at which this freedom�察�that gives itself consciousness�察�might manage to
arrive�察�would consist in the fact that such freedom qua universal substance made itself into an
object and an abiding existence。 This objective otherness would there be the differentiation which
enabled it to divide itself into stable spiritual spheres and into the members of distinct powers。
These spheres would partly be the thought´constituted factors of a power that is differentiated into
legislative�察�judicial and executive�察�but partly they would be the substantial elements we found in the
real world of spiritual culture�察�and�察�since the content of universal action would be more closely
taken note of�察�they would be the particular spheres of labour�察�which are further distinguished as
more specific ;estates; or social ranks。 Universal freedom�察�which would have differentiated itself in
this manner into its various parts�察�and by the very fact of doing so would have made itself an
existing substance�察�would thereby be free from particular individualities�察�and could apportion the
plurality of individuals to its several organic parts。
The activity and being of personality would�察�however�察�find itself by this process confined to a
branch of the whole�察�to one kind of action and existence�察�when placed in the element of existence��
personality would bear the meaning of a determinate personality�察�it would cease to be in reality
universal self´consciousness。 Neither by the idea of submission to self´imposed laws�察�which would
assign to it only a part of the whole work�察�nor by its being represented when legislation and
universal action take place�察�does self´consciousness here let itself be cheated out of the actual
realitythe fact that itself lays down the law and itself accomplishes a universal and not a
particular task。 For in the case where the self is merely represented and ideally presented
��vorgestellt���察�there it is not actual�此�where it is by proxy�察�it is not。��2��
Just as the individual self´consciousness does not find itself in this universal work of absolute
freedom qua existing substance�察�as little does it find itself in the deeds proper�察�and specific
individual acts of will�察�performed by this substance。 For the universal to pass into a deed�察�it must
gather itself into the single unity of individuality�察�and put an individual consciousness in the
forefront�察�for universal will is an actual concrete will only in a self that is single and one。 Thereby��
however�察�all other individuals are excluded from the entirety of this deed�察�and have only a
restricted share in it�察�so that the deed would not be a deed of real universal self´consciousness。
Universal freedom can thus produce neither a positive achievement nor a deed�察�there is l