phenomenology of mind-及81嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
consciousness is also real in its inherent nature�察�and has likewise to take this aspect for its point of
view and criterion�察�and by so doing round off completely the judgment of self´conscious spirit。
According to this aspect state´power expresses its essential nature�此�the power of the state is in
part the quiet insistence of law�察�in part government and prescription�察�which appoints and regulates
the particular processes of universal action。 The one is the simple substance itself�察�the other its
action which animates and sustains itself and all individuals。 The individual thus finds therein his
ground and nature expressed�察�organized�察�and exercised。 As against this�察�the individual�察�by the
enjoyment of wealth�察�does not get�察�to know his own universal nature�此�he only gets a transitory
consciousness and enjoyment of himself qua particular and self´existing and discovers his
discordance�察�his want of agreement with his own essential nature。 The conceptions Good and Bad
thus receive here a content the opposite of what they had before。
These two ways of judging find each of them an identity and a disagreement。 In the first case
consciousness finds the power of the state out of agreement with it�察�and the enjoyment that came
from wealth in accord with it�察�while in the second case the reverse holds good。 There is a twofold
attainment of identity and a twofold form of disagreement�此�there is an opposite relation established
towards both the essential realities。 We must pass judgment on these different ways of judging as
such�察�to this end we have to apply the criterion already brought forward。 The conscious relation
which finds identity or agreement�察�is�察�according to this standard�察�the Good�察�that which finds want
of agreement�察�the Bad。 These two types of relation must henceforth be regarded as diverse forms
of conscious existence。 Conscious life�察�through taking up a different kind of relation�察�thereby
becomes itself characterized as different�察�comes to be itself good or bad。 It is not thus distinct in
virtue of the fact that it took as its constitutive principle either existence for itself�察�or mere being in
itself�察�for both are equally essential moments of its life�此�that dual way of judging�察�above discussed��
presented those principles as separated�察�and contained�察�therefore�察�merely abstract ways of
judging。 Concrete actual conscious life has within it both principles�察�and the distinction between its
forms falls solely within its own nature�察�viz。 inside the relation of itself to the real。
��b�� The Cleavage of Self´consciousness �此�Nobility and Baseness
This relation takes opposite forms�察�in the one there is an active attitude towards state´power and
wealth as to something with which it is in accord�察�in the other it is related to these realities as to
something with which it is at variance。 A conscious life which finds itself at one with them has the
attribute of Nobility。 In the case of the public authority of the state�察�it regards what is in accord
with itself�察�and sees that it has there its own nature pure and simple and the sphere for the exercise
of its own powers�察�and stands in the position of actually rendering obedient service in its interests��
as well as that of inner reverence towards it。 In the same way in the sphere of wealth�察�it sees that
wealth secures for it the consciousness of self´existence�察�of realizing the other essential aspect of
its nature�此�hence it looks upon wealth likewise as something essential in relation to itself ��
acknowledges him from whence the enjoyment comes as a benefactor�察�and。 considers itself under
a debt of obligation。
The conscious life involved in the other relation�察�again�察�that of disagreement�察�has the attribute of
Baseness。 It holds to its discordance with both those essential elements。 It looks upon the
authoritative power of the state as a chain�察�as something suppressing its separate existence for its
own sake�察�and hence hates the ruler�察�obeys only with secret malice�察�and stands ever ready to burst
out in rebellion。 It sees�察�too�察�in wealth�察�by which it attains to the enjoyment of its own independent
existence�察�merely something discordant�察�i。e。 its disagreement with its permanent nature�察�since
through wealth it only gets a sense of its particular isolated existence and a consciousness of
passing enjoyment�察�since it loves wealth but despises it�察�and�察�with the disappearance of enjoyment��
of what is inherently evanescent regards its relation to the man of wealth as having ceased too。
These relations now express�察�in the first instance�察�a judgment�察�the determinate characterization of
what both those facts ��state´power and wealth�А�are as objects for consciousness�察�not as yet what
they are in their complete objective nature ��an und f┨r sich��。 The reflexion which is presented in
this judgment is partly at first for us ��who are philosophizing�А�an affirmation of the one
characteristic along with the other�察�and hence is a simultaneous cancelling of both�察�it is not yet the
reflexion of them for consciousness itself。 Partly�察�again�察�they are at first immediate essential entities��
they have not become this�察�nor is there in them consciousness of self�此�that for which they are is not
yet their animating principle�此�they are predicates which are not yet themselves subject。 On account
of this separation�察�the entirety of the spiritual process of judgment also breaks asunder and falls
into two modes of consciousness�察�each of which has a one´sided character。 Now�察�just as at the
outset the indifference of the two aspects in the process of self´estrangement´one of which was the
inherent essential being of pure consciousness�察�viz。 the determinate ideas of good and bad�察�the
other their actual existence in the form of state´power and wealth´passed to the stage of being
related the one to the other�察�passed to the level of judgment�察�in the same way this external relation
must be raised to the level of their inner unity�察�must become a relation of thought to actual reality��
and also the spirit animating both the forms of judgment will make its appearance。 This takes place
when judgment passes into inference�察�becomes the mediating process in which the middle term
necessitating and connecting both sides of the judgment is brought into relief。
The noble type of consciousness�察�then�察�finds itself in the judgment related to state´power�察�in the
sense that this power is indeed not a self as yet but at first is universal substance�察�in which��
however�察�this form of mind feels its own essential nature to exist�察�is conscious of its own purpose
and absolute content。 By taking up a positive relation to this substance�察�it assumes a negative
attitude towards its own special purposes�察�its particular content and individual existence�察�and lets
them disappear。 This type of mind is the heroism of Service�察�the virtue which sacrifices individual
being to the universal�察�and thereby brings this into existence�察�the type of personality which of itself
renounces possession and enjoyment�察�acts for the sake of the prevailing power�察�and in this way
becomes a concrete reality。
Through this process the universal becomes united and bound up with existence in general�察�just as
the individual consciousness makes itself by this renunciation essentially universal。 That from which
this consciousness estranges itself by submitting to serve is its consciousness immersed in mere
existence�此�but the being alienated from itself is the inherent nature。 By thus shaping its life in accord
with what is universal�察�it acquires a Reverence for itself�察�and gets reverence from others。 The
power of the state�察�however�察�which to start with was merely universal in thought�察�the inherent
nature�察�becomes through this very process universal in fact�察�becomes actual power。 It is actually so
only in getting that actual obedience which it obtains through self´consciousness judging it to be the
essential reality�察�and through the self being freely sacrificed to it。 The result of this action�察�binding
the essential reality and self indissolubly together�察�is to produce a twofold actuality ! a self that is
truly actualized�察�and a state´power whose authority is accepted as true。
��c�� Service and Advice
Owing to this alienation ��implied in the idea of sacrifice�А�state´power�察�however�察�is not yet a
self´consciousness that knows itself as state´power。 It is merely the law of the state�察�its inherent
principle�察�that is accepted�察�the state´power has as yet no particular will。 For as yet the
self´consciousness rendering service has not surrendered its pure selfhood�察�and made it an
animating influence in the exercise of state´power�察�the serving attitude merely gives the state its
bare being�察�sacrifices merely its existence to the state�察�not its essential nature。 This type of
self´consciousness has a value as one that is in conformity with the essential nature�察�and is
acknowledged and accepted because of its inherent reality。 The others find their essential nature
operative in it�察�but not their independent existence ! find their thinking�察�their pure consciousness
fulfilled�察�but not their specific individuality。 It has a value�察�therefore�察�in their thoughts�察�and is
honoured accordingly。 Such a type is the haughty vassal�察�be is active in the interests of the
state´power�察�so far as the latter is not a personal will ��a monarch�А�but merely an essential will。 His
self´importance lies only in the honour thus acquired�察�only in the general mind which directs its
thoughts to what is essential�察�not in an individuality thinking gratefully of services rendered�察�for he
has not helped this individuality ��the monarch�А�to get independence。 The language he would use��
were he to occupy a direct relation to the personal win of the state´power�察�which thus far has not
arisen�察�would take the form of ;counsel; imparted in the interests of what is best for all。
State´power has�察�therefore�察�still at this stage no will to oppose the advice�察�and does not decide
between the different opinions as to what is universally the best。 It is not yet governmental control��
and on that account is in truth not yet real state´power。 Individual self´existence�察�the possession of
an individual will that is not yet qua will surrendered�察�is the inner secretly reserved spiritual
principle of the various classes and stations�察�a spirit which keeps for its own behoof what suits
itself best�察�in spite of its words about the universal best�察�and tends to make this clap´trap about
what is universally the best a substitute for action bringing it about。 The sacrifice of existence��
which takes place in the case of service�察�is indeed complete when it goes so far as death。 But the
endurance of the danger of death which the individual survives�察�leaves him still a specific kind of
existence�察�and hence a particular self´reference�察�and this makes the counsel imparted in the
interests of the universally best ambiguous and open to suspicion�察�it really means�察�in point of fact��
retaining the claim to a private opinion of his own�察�and a separate individual will as against the
power of the state。 Its relation to the latter is�察�therefore�察�still one of discordance�察�and it possesses
the characteristic found in the case of the base type o