握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > phenomenology of mind >

及78嫗

phenomenology of mind-及78嫗

弌傍�� phenomenology of mind 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



again inner riches or poverty of mind and character´is not contained in this empty form and does
not concern it。 The content belongs�察�therefore�察�to a peculiar specific power�察�which is something
different from the formal universal�察�is chance and caprice。 Consciousness of right�察�therefore�察�even
in the very process of making its claim good�察�experiences the loss of its own reality�察�discovers its
complete lack of inherent substantiality�察�and to describe an individual as a ;person; is to use´an
expression of contempt。

                 3。 The Lord of the World �察�the Absolute Person

The free and unchecked power possessed by the content takes determinate shape in this way。 The
absolute plurality of dispersed atomic personalities is�察�by the nature of this characteristic feature��
gathered at the same time into a single centre�察�alien to them and just as devoid of the life of spirit
��geistlos��。 That central point is�察�in one respect�察�like the atomic rigidity of their personality�察�a merely
single reality�察�but in contrast to their empty singleness�察�it has the significance of the entire content��
and hence is taken to be the essential element�察�while again�察�in contrast to their pretended absolute��
but inherently insubstantial�察�reality it is the universal power�察�and absolute actuality。 This ;lord and
master of the world; takes himself in this way to be the absolute person�察�comprising at the same
time all existence within himself�察�for whom there exists no higher type of spirit。 He is a person�此�but
the solitary single person who has taken his stand confronting all。 These all constitute and establish
the triumphant universality of the one person�察�for the single being�察�as such�察�is truly what it is only
qua universal plurality of single units�此�cut off from this plurality�察�the solitary and single self is�察�in fact��
a powerless and unreal self。 At the same time�察�it is the consciousness of the content which is
antithetically opposed to that universal personality。 This content�察�however�察�when liberated from its
negative power�察�means chaos of spiritual powers�撮察�which�察�when let loose�察�become elemental
independent agencies�察�break out into wild extravagances and excesses�察�and fall on one another in
mad destruction。 Their helpless self´consciousness is the powerless inoperative enclosure and the
arena of their chaotic tumult。 But this master and lord of the world�察�aware of his being the sum and
substance of all actual powers�察�is the titanic self´consciousness�察�which takes itself to be the living
God。 Since�察�however�察�he exists merely qua formal self�察�which is unable to tame and subdue those
powers�察�his procedure and his self´enjoyment are equally titanic excess。��3��

The lord of the world becomes really conscious of what he isviz。 the universal might of
actualityby that power of destruction which he exercises against the contrasted selfhood of his
subjects。 For his power is not the spiritual union and concord in which the various persons might
get to know their own self´consciousness。 Rather they exist as persons separately for themselves��
and all continuity with others is excluded from the absolute punctual atomicity of their nature。 They
are�察�therefore�察�in a merely negative relation�察�a relation of exclusion both to one another

and to him�察�who is their principle of connexion or continuity。 Qua this continuity�察�he is the essential
being and content of their formal naturea content�察�however�察�foreign to them�察�and a being hostile
in character�察�which abolishes just what they take�察�to be their very essence�察�viz。 bare self´existence
without any content�察�mere empty independent existence each on its own account。 And�察�again�察�qua
the continuity of their personality�察�he destroys this very personality itself。 Juridical personality thus
finds itself�察�rather�察�without any substance of its own�察�since content alien to it is imposed on it and
holds good within it´and does so there�察�because such content is the reality of that type of
personality。 On the other hand the passion for destroying and turning over everything on this unreal
field gains for itself the consciousness of its complete supremacy。 But this self is sheer devastation��
and hence is merely beside itself�察�and is indeed the very abandonment and rejection of its own
self´consciousness。

Such�察�then�察�is the constitution of that aspect in which self´consciousness qua absolute being is
actual。 The consciousness�察�however�察�that is driven back into itself out of this actuality�察�thinks this
its insubstantiality�察�makes it an object of thought。 Formerly we saw the stoical independence of
pure thought pass through Scepticism and find its true issue in the ;unhappy consciousness;´the
truth about what constitutes its inherent and explicit nature�察�its final meaning。 If this knowledge
appeared at that stage merely as the one´sided view of a consciousness qua consciousness�察�here
the actual truth of that view has made its appearance。 The truth consists in the fact that this
universal accepted objectivity of self´consciousness is reality estranged from it。 This objectivity is
the universal actuality of the self�察�but this actuality is directly the perversion of the self as well´it is
the loss of its essential being。 The reality of the self that was not found in the ethical world�察�has
been gained by its reverting into the ;person;。 What in the case of the former was all harmony and
union�察�comes now on the scene�察�no doubt in developed form�察�but self´estranged。



                         



1。 Reading ;selbstbewusstlose; ��1st ed。��。 

2。 v。 p。 229 ff。 

3。 Cp。 with the above Hobbes' Leviathan。 The historical reference here is to the ;apotheosis; of
the Roman Emperors。 




B
                      The Spirit in Self´Estrangement !
             The Discipline of Culture and Civilisation ��2��

The ethical substance preserved and kept opposition enclosed within its simple conscious life�察�and
this consciousness was in immediate unity with its own essential nature。 That nature has therefore
the simple characteristic of something merely existing for the consciousness which is directed
immediately upon it�察�and whose ;custom; ��Sitte�� it is。 Consciousness does not take itself to be
particular excluding self�察�nor does the substance mean for it an existence shut out from it�察�with
which it would have to establish its identity only through estranging itself and thus at the same time
have to produce that substance。 But that spirit�察�whose self is absolutely insular�察�absolutely discrete��
finds its content over against itself in the form of a reality that is just as impenetrable as itself�察�and
the world here gets the characteristic of being something external�察�negative to self´consciousness。
Yet this world is a spiritual reality�察�it is essentially the fusion of individuality with being。 This its
existence is the work of self´consciousness�察�but likewise an actuality immediately present and alien
to it�察�which has a peculiar being of its own�察�and in which it does not know itself。 This reality is the
external element and the free content��1�� of the sphere of legal right。 But this external reality�察�which
the lord of the world of legal right takes control of�察�is not merely this elementary external entity
casually lying before the self�察�it is his work�察�but not in a positive sense�察�rather negatively so。 It
acquires its existence by self´consciousness of its own accord relinquishing itself and giving up its
essentiality�察�the condition which�察�in that waste and ruin which prevail in the sphere of right�察�the
external force of the elements let loose seems to bring upon self´consciousness。 These elements by
themselves are sheer ruin and destruction�察�and cause their own overthrow。 This overthrow��
however�察�this their negative nature�察�is just the self�察�it is their subject�察�their action�察�and their process。
Such process and activity again�察�through which the substance becomes actual�察�are the
estrangement of personality�察�for the immediate self�察�i。e。 the self without estrangement and holding
good as it stands�察�is without substantial content�察�and the sport of these raging elements。 Its
substance is thus just its relinquishment�察�and the relinquishment is the substance�察�i。e。 the spiritual
powers forming themselves into a coherent world and thereby securing their subsistence。

The substance in this way is spirit�察�self´conscious unity of the self and the essential nature�察�but both
also take each other to mean and to imply alienation。 Spirit is consciousness of an objective reality
which exists independently on its own account。 Over against this consciousness stands�察�however��
that unity of the self with the essential nature�察�consciousness pure and simple over against actual
consciousness。 On the one side actual self´consciousness by its self´relinquishment passes over
into the real world�察�and the latter back again into the former。 On the other side�察�however�察�this very
actuality�察�both person and objectivity�察�is cancelled and superseded�察�they are purely universal。 This
their alienation is pure consciousness�察�or the essential nature。 The ;present; has directly its
opposite in its ;beyond;�察�which is its thinking and its being thought�察�just as this again has its
opposite in what is here in the ;present;�察�which is the actuality of the ;beyond; but alienated from
it。

Spirit in this case�察�therefore�察�constructs not merely one world�察�but a twofold world�察�divided and
self´opposed。 The world of the ethical spirit is its own proper present�察�and hence every power it
possesses is found in this unity of the present�察�and�察�so far as each separates itself from the other��
each is still in equilibrium with the whole。 Nothing has the significance of a negative of
self´consciousness�察�even the spirit of the departed is in the life´blood of his relative�察�is present in
the self of the family�察�and the universal power of government is the will�察�the self of the nation。 Here��
however�察�what is present means merely objective actuality�察�which has its consciousness in the
beyond�察�each single moment�察�as an essential entity�察�receives this�察�and thereby actuality�察�from an
other�察�and so far as it is actual�察�its essential being is something other than its own actuality。 Nothing
has a spirit self´established and indwelling within it�察�rather�察�each is outside itself in what is alien to
it。 The equilibrium of the whole is not the unity which abides by itself�察�nor its inwardly secured
tranquillity�察�but rests on the estrangement of its opposite。 The whole is�察�therefore�察�like each single
moment�察�a self´estranged reality。 It breaks up into two spheres�此�in one kingdom self´consciousness
is actually both the self and its object�察�and in another we have the kingdom of pure consciousness��
which�察�being beyond the former�察�has no actual present�察�but exists for Faith�察�is matter of Belief。
Now just as the ethical world passes from the separation of divine and human law�察�with its various
forms�察�and its consciousness gets away from the division into knowledge and the absence of
knowledge�察�and returns into the principle which is its destiny�察�into the self which is the power to
destroy and negate this opposition�察�so�察�too�察�both these kingdoms of self´alienated spirit will return
into the self。 But if the former�察�the first self h

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��3�� 家��3��

低辛嬬浪散議