phenomenology of mind-及76嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
consciousness of the doer�察�but is merely implicit�察�present in the subjective inward guilt of the
decision and the action。 But the ethical consciousness is more complete�察�its guilt purer�察�if it knows
beforehand the law and the ower which it opposes�察�if it takes them to be sheer violence and
wrong�察�to be a contingency in the ethical life�察�and wittingly�察�like Antigone�察�con mits the crime。 The
deed when accomplished transforms its point of view�察�the very performance of it eo ipso
expresses that what is ethical has to be actual�察�for the realization of the purpose is the very
purpose of acting。 Acting expresses precisely the unity of reality and the substance�察�it expresses
the fact that actuality is not an accident for the essential element�察�but that�察�in union with that
element�察�it is given to no right which is not true right。 On account of this actuality and on account of
its deed ethical consciousness must acknowledge its opposite as its own actuality�察�it must
acknowledge its guilt。
Because of our sufferings we acknowledge we have erred。��2��
To acknowledge this is expressly to indicate that the severance between ethical purpose and
actuality has been clone away�察�it means the return to the ethical frame of mind�察�which knows that
nothing counts but right。 Thereby�察�however�察�the agent surrenders his character and the reality of his
self�察�and has utterly collapsed。 His being lies in belonging to his ethical law�察�as his substance�察�in
acknowledging the opposite law�察�however�察�he has ceased to find his substance in this law�察�and
instead of reality this has become an unreality�察�a mere scntiment�察�a frame of mind。 The substance
no doubt appears as the ;pathic; element��3�� in the individuality�察�and the individuality appears as the
factor which animates the substance�察�and hence stands above it。
But the substance is a ;pathic; element which is at the same time his character�察�the ethical
individuality is directly and inherently one with this its universal�察�exists in it alone�察�and is incapable
of surviving the destruction which this ethical power suffers at the hands of its opposite。
This individuality�察�however�察�has all the same the certainty that that individuality�察�whose ;pathic;
element is this opposite power ��the opposed law�В察�suffers no more harm than it has inflicted。 The
opposition of the ethical powers to one another�察�and the process of the individualities setting up
these powers in life and action�察�have reached their true end only in so far as both sides undergo the
same destruction。 For neither of the powers has any advantage over the other that it should be a
more essential moment of the substance common to both。 The fact of their being equally and to the
same degree essential�察�and subsisting independently beside each other�察�means their having no
separate self�察�in the act they have a self´nature�察�but a different self�察 � which contradicts the unity of
the self and cancels their claim to independent right�察�and thus brings about their necessary
destruction。 Character too�察�in part�察�looking at its ;pathic; element�察�the substance�察�belongs to one
alone�察�in part�察�when we look at the aspect of knowledge�察�the one character like the other is
divided into a conscious element and an unconscious�此�and since each itself calls forth this
opposition�察�and the want of knowledge is by the act also its doing�察�each falls into the guilt which
consumes it。 The victory of one power and its character�察�and the defeat of the other side�察�would
thus be merely the part and the incomplete work�察�which steadily advances till the equilibrium
between the two is attained。 It is in the equal subjection of both sides that absolute right is first
accomplished�察�and the ethical substance�察�as the negative force devouring both sides�察�in other
words omnipotent and righteous Destiny�察�makes its appearance。
If both powers are taken according to their specific content and its individualization�察�we have the
scene presented of a contest between them as individuated。 On its formal side�察�this is the struggle
of the ethical order and of self´consciousness with unconscious nature and a contingency due to
this nature。 The latter has a right as against the former�察�because this is only objective spirit�察�merely
in immediate unity with its substance。 On the side of content�察�the struggle is the rupture of divine
and human law。 The youth goes forth from the unconscious life of the family and becomes the
individuality of the community ��i。e。 Ruler�А� But that he still shares the natural life from which he has
torn himself away is seen in the fact that he emerges there ! from only to find his claim affected by
the contingency that there are two brothers��4�� who with equal right take possession of the
community�撮�5�� the inequality due to the one having been born earlier and the other later�察�an
inequality which is a natural difference�察�has no importance for them when they enter the ethical life
of society。 But government�察�as the single soul�察�the self of the national spirit�察�does not admit of a
duality of individuality�察�and in contrast to the ethical necessity of this unity�察�nature appears as by
accident providing more than one。 These two ��brothers�В察�therefore�察�become disunited�察�and their
equal right in regard to the power of the state is destructive to both�察�for they are equally wrong。
Humanly considered�察�he has committed the crime who�察�not being in actual possession�察�attacks the
community�察�at the head of which the other stood。 While again he has right on his side who knew
how to seize the other merely qua particular individual�察�detached from the community�察�and who
banished him�察�while thus powerless�察�out of the community�察�he has merely laid hands on the
individual as such�察�not the community�察�not the essential nature of human right。 The community��
attacked and defended from a point of view which is merely particular�察�maintains itself�察�and both
brothers find their destruction reciprocally through one another。 For individuality�察�which involves
peril to the whole in the maintenance of its own self´existence ��F┨rsichseyn���察�has thrust its own
self out of the community�察�and is disintegrated in its own nature。 The community�察�however�察�will do
honour to the one who is found on its side�察�the government�察�the reestablished singleness of the self
of the community�察�will punish by depriving of the last honour him who already proclaimed its
devastation on the walls of the city。 He who came to affront the highest spiritual form of conscious
life�察�the spirit of the community�察�must be stripped of the honour of his entire and complete nature��
the honour due to the spirit of the departed。��6��
But if the universal thus lightly knocks off the highest point of its pyramid�察�and doubtless triumphs
victoriously over the family�察�the rebellious principle of individuation�察�it has thereby merely put itself
into conflict with divine law�察�the self´conscious with the unconscious spirit。 For the latter�察�this
unconscious spirit�察�is the other essential power�察�and therefore the power undestroyed�察�and only
insulted by the former。 It finds�察�however�察�only a bloodless shade to lend it help towards actually
carrying itself out in the face of that masterful and openly enunciated law。 Being the law of
weakness and of darkness�察�it therefore gives way�察�to begin with�察�before law which has force and
publicity�察�for the strength of the former is effective in the nether realm�察�not on earth and in the light
of day。 But the actual and concrete�察�which has taken away from what is inward its honour and its
power�察�has thereby consumed its own real nature。 The spirit which is manifest to the light of day
has the roots of its power in the lower world�此�the certainty felt by a nation�察�a certainty which is sure
of itself and which makes itself assured�察�finds the truth of its oath binding all its members into one��
solely in the mute unconscious substance of all�察�in the waters of forgetfulness。 In consequence�察�the
fulfilment of the public spirit turns round into its opposite�察�and learns that its supreme right is
supreme wrong�察�its victory rather its own defeat。 The slain�察�whose right is injured�察�knows��
therefore�察�how to find means of vengeance which are equally as real and strong as the power at
whose hands it has suffered。 These powers are other communities�撮�7�� whose altars the dogs or
birds defiled with the corpse of the dead�察�which is not raised into unconscious universality by being
restored�察�as is its due�察�to the ultimate individuum�察�the elemental earth�察�but instead has remained
above ground in the sphere of reality�察�and has now received�察�as the force of divine law�察�a
self´conscious actual universality。 They rise up in hostility�察�and destroy the community which has
dishonoured and destroyed its own power�察�the sacred claims�察�the ;piety; of the family。
Represented in this way�察�the movement of human and divine law finds the expression of its
necessity in individuals�察�in whom the universal appears as a ;pathic; element�察�and the activity of the
movement as action of individuals�察�which gives the appearance of contingency to the necessity of
the process。 But individuality and action constitute the principle of individuation in general�察�a
principle which in its pure universality was called inner divine law。 As a moment of the visible
community it does not merely exhibit that unconscious activity of the nether world�察�its operation is
not simply external in its existence�察�it has an equally manifest visible existence and process�察�actual
in the actual nation。 Taken in this form�察�what was represented as a simple process of the ;pathic;
element as embodied in individuals�察�assumes another look�察�and crime and the resulting ruin of the
community assume the proper form of their existence。
Human law�察�then�察�in its universal mode of existence is the community�察�in its efficient operation in
general is the manhood of the community�察�in its actual efficient operation is the government。 It has
its being�察�its process�察�and its subsistence by consuming and absorbing into itself the separatist
action of the household gods ��Penates���察�the individualization into insular independent families
which are under the management of womankind�察�and by keeping them dissolved in the fluent
continuum of its own nature。 The family at the same time�察�however�察�is in general its element�察�the
individual consciousness its universal operative basis。 Since the community gets itself subsistence
only by breaking in upon family happiness�察�and dissolving ��individual�А�self´consciousness into the
universal�察�it creates its enemy for itself within its own gates�察�creates it in what it suppresses�察�and
what is at the same time essential to it ! womankind in general。 Womankind the everlasting irony
in the life of the community changes by intrigue the universal purpose of government into a private
end�察�transforms its universal activity into a work of this or that specific individual�察�and perverts the
universal property of the state into a possession and ornament for the family。 Woman in this way
turns to ridicule the grave wisdom of maturity�察�which�察�being dead to all particular aims�察�to private
pleasure�察�personal satisfaction�察�and actual activity as well�察�thinks of�察�and is concerned for�察�merely
what is universal�察�s