握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > phenomenology of mind >

及6嫗

phenomenology of mind-及6嫗

弌傍�� phenomenology of mind 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



          and forms�察�and each is accepted in turn as the true moral reality。 The mind passes from
          one to the other�察�when one is accepted the other is set aside。 The moral consciousness
          tries�察�so to say�察�to hide from itself the endless diversity of its appearances�察�simply
          because it clings tenaciously to the idea that the inherent self´completeness of itself is a
          unity per se which can only admit diversity on sufferance。 Formerly it eliminated all diversity
          by eliminating the source of diversity´nature。 Here it is forced to admit diversity�察�and yet
          cannot give up the claim to be an abstract single unity independent of difference。 Thus its
          condition here is a mixture of self´realization and self´sophistication´a condition which
          Hegel characterizes as ;Dissemblance;�察�and which borders upon and may pass into
          ;Hypocrisy;。 Hegel regards this attitude as the inevitable outcome of the preceding。

               c。 Conscience�此�the ;beautiful soul;�此�Evil and the forgiveness of it

          Translator's comments�此�The one´sidedness of each of the preceding stages is removed
          when the moral consciousness assumes the attitude of Conscience。 Here the individual is
          at once self´legislating and yet sure of the unity and self completeness of its own will in
          the midst of all diversity of moral content。 The immediacy involved in the idea of a
          ;self´legislating; will appears in the perceptual directness of the action of conscience�此�it
          ;sees; what is right and does the right without hesitation。 But it is not an abstract ;faculty;
          of willing independent of the varied content of the individual's moral experience。 The
          universality of the individual permeates and pervades all the content of his being and
          makes him a concrete moral individuality�察�at home with himself in the smallest detail as
          well as in the larger issues of his self´complete spiritual existence。 Conscience�察�as Butler
          says�察�is a ;system; or ;constitution;�察�analogous in the case of the individual to the
          objectified system of the state and its institutions。 The self´deception of the second
          one´sided phase of moral experience seems also to have no place in Conscience�察�for
          Conscience is the transparent and self´revealing unity in all the content of moral
          individuality。 Only on this condition can it be absolutely confident and certain of itself in all
          its functions�察�and this certainty of itself is the inalienable characteristic of conscience。 It
          thinks it cannot be deceived about itself�察�can neither delude itself nor others�察�but freely
          realizes all that it professes to be and professes to be all that it realizes�察�It is thus the
          supreme achievement of finite spiritual existence�察�but it has no meaning apart from the
          existence of finite spirit in the form of society。

          Its very conditions�察�however�察�give rise to delusion and deception of another kind。 For�察�so
          complete is its world and its life�察�that it may attempt to cut itself off from the concrete
          substance of actual society which alone makes possible the existence of conscience。 It
          then tries to cultivate goodness in solitary isolation from the actual social whole。 This is the
          attitude of the ;beautiful soul;�察�a type of spiritual life cultivated by the ;Moravians;�察�and
          familiar during the Romantic movement。 Novalis is the best´known example�察�the classical
          interpretation of the mood was given in Goethe's Meister's Lehrjahre�察�Bk。 6。 It has the
          self´confidence and individual inspiration of Conscience�察�but frankly rejects the concrete
          objectivity which secures for Conscience liberation from mere subjectivity。 The very rejection
          of objectivity is the only achievement of the ;beautiful soul;�察�and is held to be the greatest
          triumph of its self´conscious freedom。 It flees from concrete moral action�察�and luxuriates
          in a state of self´hypnotized inactivity。 Still it takes up this attitude in the interests of ;pure
          goodness;�察�and hence in withdrawing from the lowly deeds of the daily moral life it
          indulges all the more in the self´cloistered cult of the beauty of holiness。 It is moral
          individualism turned into mystic self´absorption。 liegel's analysis brings out that this type
          of spirit is in principle as it was in fact the direct ally of moral evil。 For ��1�� its refusal to act
          means indifference to all action�察�good and bad alike�察�and the rejection of the demands of
          duty is precisely immorality�察。┌�2�� its self´closed isolation destroys the very principle of true
          morality�察�universality of will�察�recognition and acknowledgment by others of the claims of
          the individual will。

          But this extremity of finite spiritual experience is the opportunity of Absolute Spirit。 The
          attitude of this mystical moral individuality is indirectly an indication of the finittude of the
          moral point of view and therefore of its failure to supply the absolute self´completeness
          which spirit requires。 The very consciousness by finite spirit of its inherent incompleteness
          is implicitly a consciousness of the Absolute Spirit。 The consciousness of Absolute Spirit is
          the attitude of experience known as Religion。

��CC��。 Religion

VII。 Religion in General

          Translator's comments�此�The appearance of Absolute Spirit as a principle constituting on its
          own account a distinctive stage of experience is at once a demand of the preceding
          development and a condition of making experience self´complete。 Finite or socialized
          spiritual existence is at its best incapable of establishing the truth that ;Spirit is the only
          reality;�察�for the more finite spirit approximates to the state of claiming to be
          self´contained the more is it dependent on universal self´consciousness。 A trans´finite or
          Absolute Spiritual Being as such is thus necessary to realize and sustain the fullness of
          meaning which finite spirit possesses。 Moreover�察�if ;the truth is the whole;�察�and only so is
          truth self´complete and self´explaining�察�and if reality is essentially spiritual ! then
          experience only finds its complete meaning realized in the principle of Absolute Spirit。
          Hence the final stage of the Phenomenology of experience is the appearance therein of
          Absolute Spirit。 Moreover�察�Absolute Spirit�察�in its own distinctive existence�察�could only appear
          at the end of the process of experience�察�for the whole of that process is required to reveal
          and to constitute the substance of which the Absolute consists。 But the peculiarity of the
          stage now reached is that here the Absolute operates in its undivided totality to form a
          definite type of experience�察�or�察�in the language of the text�察�we have the Absolute here
          ;conscious of its self;。 No doubt�察�in all the previous stages�察 �consciousness;��
          ;self´consciousness;�察 �reason;�察 �spirit;�察�the Absolute has been implied as a limiting
          principle�察�at once substantiating and determining the boundaries of each stage�此�hence
          each stage had an Absolute of its own�察�the character of which was derived in each case
          from the peculiarity of the stage in question。 Now�察�however�察�we have the Absolute by itself��
          in its single self´completeness�察�as the sole formative factor of a certain type of
          experience。

          The Absolute�察�then�察�in its own self´complete reality appears as the constitutive principle of
          experience。 The experience here is the self´consciousness of Absolute Spirit�察�it appears to
          itself in all its objects。 Since all the modes of finitude hitherto considered ��consciousness��
          self´consciousness�察�etc。�� are embraced in its single totality�察�it may use each and all of
          these various modes as the media through and in which to appear。 When it appears in
          and through these modes of finitude we have the attitude of Religion。 Since these modes��
          as we saw�察�differ�察�the religious attitude differs�察�and accordingly we have various types or
          forms of religion。

          Each of these forms�察�in and through which the Absolute appears�察�is circumscribed in its
          nature and process�察�each is per se inadequate to the revelation of complete absolute
          self´consciousness�此�hence the variety of religion is necessitated by and is indirectly due to
          the failure of any one type and the inadequacy of every single type to reveal the Absolute
          completely。 A form of appearance or self´manifestation of the absolute is therefore
          demanded which will reveal Absolute Spirit adequately to itself as it essentially is in itself。
          Here it will know itself�察�so to say�察�face to face�察�and with perfect completeness。 This form is
          Absolute Knowledge。 Hence Religion and Absolute Knowledge are the final stages in the
          argument of the Phenomenology。 The former is dealt with in the immediately succeeding
          section ��VII�� and its various subsections�察�the latter forms the subject of the concluding
          section ��VIII�� of the work。

          A。 Natural Religion

          Translator's comments�此�The arrangement of the analysis of Religion and the divisions into
          the various subsections are�察�as indicated in the preceding note ��p。 683���察�determined by
          the general development of experience。 That development is from the immediate through
          mediation to the fusion of immediacy and mediation。 The stages of the development of
          experience are Consciousness�察�Self´consciousness�察�Reason�察�the latter leading to its
          highest level ! finite Spiritual existence。 The development of Religion follows these various
          ways in which objects are given in experience�察�and the three chief divisions of Religion are
          determined accordingly�此�Natural Religion is religion at the level of Consciousness�察�Art��
          Religion at the level of Self´consciousness�察�Revealed Religion is Religion at the level of
          Reason and Spirit。 Each of these is again subdivided�察�and the subdivision follows more or
          less closely the various subdivisions of these three ultimate levels of experience !
          Consciousness�察�etc。 Thus�察�in Natural Religion�察�we have Religion at the level of
          Sense´certainty ! ;Light;�此�Religion at the level of Perception ! ;Life;�此�and Religion at the
          level of Understanding ! the reciprocal relation constituted by the ;play of forces; appears
          as the relation of the ;Artificer; to his own product。

          The general principle is not worked out in detail�察�with the same obviousness�察�in the case of
          the other two primary types of Religion ! Art and Rev

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��3�� 家��3��

低辛嬬浪散議