握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > lecture03 >

及2嫗

lecture03-及2嫗

弌傍�� lecture03 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��






human consciousness a sense of reality�察�a feeling of objective



presence�察�a perception of what we may call ;something there�察�



more deep and more general than any of the special and particular



;senses; by which the current psychology supposes existent



realities to be originally revealed。  If this were so�察�we might



suppose the senses to waken our attitudes and conduct as they so



habitually do�察�by first exciting this sense of reality�察�but



anything else�察�any idea�察�for example�察�that might similarly excite



it�察�would have that same prerogative of appearing real which



objects of sense normally possess。  So far as religious



conceptions were able to touch this reality´feeling�察�they would



be believed in in spite of criticism�察�even though they might be



so vague and remote as to be almost unimaginable�察�even though



they might be such non´entities in point of WHATNESS�察�as Kant



makes the objects of his moral theology to be。







The most curious proofs of the existence of such an



undifferentiated sense of reality as this are found in



experiences of hallucination。  It often happens that an



hallucination is imperfectly developed�此 �the person affected will



feel a ;presence; in the room�察�definitely localized�察�facing in



one particular way�察�real in the most emphatic sense of the word��



often coming suddenly�察�and as suddenly gone�察�and yet neither



seen�察�heard�察�touched�察�nor cognized in any of the usual ;sensible;



ways。  Let me give you an example of this�察�before I pass to the



objects with whose presence religion is more peculiarly



concerned。







An intimate friend of mine�察�one of the keenest intellects I know��



has had several experiences of this sort。  He writes as follows



in response to my inquiries��







;I have several times within the past few years felt the so´



called 'consciousness of a presence。'  The experiences which I



have in mind are clearly distinguishable from another kind of



experience which I have had very frequently�察�and which I fancy



many persons would also call the 'consciousness of a presence。'



But the difference for me between the two sets of experience is



as great as the difference between feeling a slight warmth



originating I know not where�察�and standing in the midst of a



conflagration with all the ordinary senses alert。







;It was about September�察�1884�察�when I had the first experience。



On the previous night I had had�察�after getting into bed at my



rooms in College�察�a vivid tactile hallucination of being grasped



by the arm�察�which made me get up and search the room for an



intruder�察�but the sense of presence properly so called came on



the next night。  After I had got into bed and blown out the



candle�察�I lay awake awhile thinking on the previous night's



experience�察�when suddenly I FELT something come into the room and



stay close to my bed。  It remained only a minute or two。  I did



not recognize it by any ordinary sense and yet there was a



horribly unpleasant 'sensation' connected with it。  It stirred



something more at the roots of my being than any ordinary



perception。  The feeling had something of the quality of a very



large tearing vital pain spreading chiefly over the chest�察�but



within the organismand yet the feeling was not PAIN so much as



ABHORRENCE。  At all events�察�something was present with me�察�and I



knew its presence far more surely than I have ever known the



presence of any fleshly living creature。  I was conscious of its



departure as of its coming�此 �an almost instantaneously swift



going through the door�察�and the 'horrible sensation' disappeared。







;On the third night when I retired my mind was absorbed in some



lectures which I was preparing�察�and I was still absorbed in these



when I became aware of the actual presence ��though not of the



COMING�� of the thing that was there the night before�察�and of the



'horrible sensation。' I then mentally concentrated all my effort



to charge this 'thing��' if it was evil to depart�察�if it was NOT



evil�察�to tell me who or what it was�察�and if it could not explain



itself�察�to go�察�and that I would compel it  to go。  It went



as on the previous night�察�and my body quickly recovered its



normal state。







;On two other occasions in my life I have had precisely the same



'horrible sensation。'  Once it lasted a full quarter of an hour。 



In all three instances the certainty that there in outward space



there stood SOMETHING was indescribably STRONGER than the



ordinary certainty of companionship when we are in the close



presence of ordinary living people。  The something seemed close



to me�察�and intensely more real than any ordinary perception。



Although I felt it to be like unto myself so to speak�察�or finite��



small�察�and distressful�察�as it were�察�I didn't recognize it as any



individual being or person。;







Of course such an experience as this does not connect itself with



the religious sphere。  Yet it may upon occasion do so�察�and the



same correspondent informs me that at more than one other



conjuncture he had the sense of presence developed with equal



intensity and abruptness�察�only then it was filled with a quality



of joy。







;There was not a mere consciousness of something there�察�but fused



in the central happiness of it�察�a startling awareness of some



ineffable good。  Not vague either�察�not like the emotional effect



of some poem�察�or scene�察�or blossom�察�of music�察�but the sure



knowledge of the close presence of a sort of mighty person�察�and



after it went�察�the memory persisted as the one perception of



reality。  Everything else might be a dream�察�but not that。;







My friend�察�as it oddly happens�察�does not interpret these latter



experiences theistically�察�as signifying the presence of God。  But



it would clearly not have been unnatural to interpret them as a



revelation of the deity's existence。  When we reach the subject



of mysticism�察�we shall have much more to say upon this head。







Lest the oddity of these phenomena should disconcert you�察�I will



venture to read you a couple of similar narratives�察�much shorter��



merely to show that we are dealing with a well´marked natural



kind of fact。  In the first case�察�which I  take from the



Journal of the Society for Psychical Research�察�the sense of



presence developed in a few moments into a distinctly



visualized hallucinationbut I leave that part of the story out。







;I had read�察─�the narrator says�察 �some twenty minutes or so�察�was



thoroughly absorbed in the book�察�my mind was perfectly quiet�察�and



for the time being my friends were quite forgotten�察�when suddenly



without a moment's warning my whole being seemed roused to the



highest state of tension or aliveness�察�and I was aware�察�with an



intenseness not easily imagined by those who had never



experienced it�察�that another being or presence was not only in



the room�察�but quite close to me。  I put my book down�察�and



although my excitement was great�察�I felt quite collected�察�and not



conscious of any sense of fear。  Without changing my position��



and looking straight at the fire�察�I knew somehow that my friend



A。 H。 was standing at my left elbow but so far behind me as to be



hidden by the armchair in which I was leaning back。  Moving my



eyes round slightly without otherwise changing my position�察�the



lower portion of one leg became visible�察�and I instantly



recognized the gray´blue material of trousers he often wore�察�but



the stuff appeared semitransparent�察�reminding me of tobacco smoke



in consistency�察┌�24�А�and hereupon the visual hallucination



came。







��24�А�Journal of the S。 P。 R。�察�February�察�1895�察�p。 26。















Another informant writes��







;Quite early in the night I was awakened。 。 。 。 I felt as if I



had been aroused intentionally�察�and at first thought some one was



breaking into the house。 。 。 。 I then turned on my side to go to



sleep again�察�and immediately felt a consciousness of a presence



in the room�察�and singular to state�察�it was not the consciousness



of a live person�察�but of a spiritual presence。  This may provoke



a smile�察�but I can only tell you the facts as they occurred to



me。  I do not know how to better describe my sensations than by



simply stating that I felt a consciousness of a spiritual



presence。 。 。 。  I felt also at the same time a strong feeling of



superstitious dread�察�as if something strange and fearful were



about to happen。;��25��







��25�А�E。 Gurney�此 �Phantasms of the Living�察�i。 384。















Professor Flournoy of Geneva gives me the following testimony of



a friend of his�察�a lady�察�who has the gift of automatic or



involuntary writing��







;Whenever I practice automatic writing�察�what makes me feel that



it is not due to a subconscious self is the feeling I always have



of a foreign presence�察�external to my body。  It is sometimes so



definitely characterized that I could point to its exact



position。  This impression of presence is impossible to describe。



It varies in intensity and clearness according to the personality



from whom the writing professes to come。  If it is some one whom



I love�察�I feel it immediately�察�before any writing has come。  My



heart seems to recognize it。;







In an earlier book of mine I have cited at full length a curious



case of presence felt by a blind man。  The presence was that of



the figure of a gray´bearded man dressed in a pepper and salt



suit�察�squeezing himself under the crack of the door and moving



across the floor of the room towards a sofa。  The blind subject



of this quasi´hallucination is an exceptionally intelligent



reporter。  He is entirely without internal visual imagery and



cannot represent light or colors to himself�察�and is positive that



his other senses�察�hearing�察�etc。�察�were not involved in this false



perception。  It seems to have been an abstract conception rather��



with the feelings of reality and spatial outwardness directly



attached to itin other words�察�a fully objectified and



exteriorized IDEA。







Such cases�察�taken along with others which would be too tedious



for quotation�察�seem sufficiently to prove the existence in our



mental machinery of a sense of present reality more diffused and



general than that which our special senses yield。  For the



psychologists the tracing of the organic seat of such a feeling



would form a pretty problemnothing could be mor

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��1�� 家��1��

低辛嬬浪散議