握握弌傍利 > 凪麿窮徨慕 > second treatise of government >

及21嫗

second treatise of government-及21嫗

弌傍�� second treatise of government 忖方�� 耽匈3500忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



ers one with another�察�it may not�察�perhaps�察�be amiss  to consider them here together。      Sec。 170。  First�察�then�察�Paternal or parental power is  nothing but that which parents have over their children�察�to  govern them for the children's good�察�till they come to the use of  reason�察�or a state of knowledge�察�wherein they may be supposed  capable to understand that rule�察�whether it be the law of nature�察 �or the municipal law of their country�察�they are to govern  themselves by�此�capable�察�I say�察�to know it�察�as well as several  others�察�who live as freemen under that law。  The affection and  tenderness which God hath planted in the breast of parents  towards their children�察�makes it evident�察�that this is not  intended to be a severe arbitrary government�察�but only for the  help�察�instruction�察�and preservation of their offspring。  But  happen it as it will�察�there is�察�as I have proved�察�no reason why  it should be thought to extend to life and death�察�at any time�察 �over their children�察�more than over any body else�察�neither can  there be any pretence why this parental power should keep the  child�察�when grown to a man�察�in subjection to the will of his  parents�察�any farther than having received life and education from 

his parents�察�obliges him to respect�察�honour�察�gratitude�察 �assistance and support�察�all his life�察�to both father and mother。   And thus�察�'tis true�察�the paternal is a natural government�察�but  not at all extending itself to the ends and jurisdictions of that  which is political。  The power of the father doth not reach at  all to the property of the child�察�which is only in his own  disposing。      Sec。 171。  Secondly�察�Political power is that power�察�which  every man having in the state of nature�察�has given up into the  hands of the society�察�and therein to the governors�察�whom the  society hath set over itself�察�with this express or tacit trust�察 �that it shall be employed for their good�察�and the preservation of  their property�此�now this power�察�which every man has in the state  of nature�察�and which he parts with to the society in all such  cases where the society can secure him�察�is to use such means�察�for  the preserving of his own property�察�as he thinks good�察�and nature  allows him�察�and to punish the breach of the law of nature in  others�察�so as ��according to the best of his reason�� may most  conduce to the preservation of himself�察�and the rest of mankind。   So that the end and measure of this power�察�when in every man's  hands in the state of nature�察�being the preservation of all of  his society�察�that is�察�all mankind in general�察�it can have no  other end or measure�察�when in the hands of the magistrate�察�but to  preserve the members of that society in their lives�察�liberties�察 �and possessions�察�and so cannot be an absolute�察�arbitrary power  over their lives and fortunes�察�which are as much as possible to  be preserved�察�but a power to make laws�察�and annex such penalties  to them�察�as may tend to the preservation of the whole�察�by cutting  off those parts�察�and those only�察�which are so corrupt�察�that they  threaten the sound and healthy�察�without which no severity is  lawful。  And this power has its original only from compact and  agreement�察�and the mutual consent of those who make up the  community。      Sec。 172。  Thirdly�察�Despotical power is an absolute�察 �arbitrary power one man has over another�察�to take away his life�察 �whenever he pleases。  This is a power�察�which neither nature  gives�察�for it has made no such distinction between one man and  another�察�nor compact can convey�此�for man not having such an  arbitrary power over his own life�察�cannot give another man such a  power over it�察�but it is the effect only of forfeiture�察�which the  aggressor makes of his own life�察�when he puts himself into the  state of war with another�此�for having quitted reason�察�which God  hath given to be the rule betwixt man and man�察�and the common  bond whereby human kind is united into one fellowship and  society�察�and having renounced the way of peace which that  teaches�察�and made use of the force of war�察�to compass his unjust  ends upon another�察�where he has no right�察�and so revolting from  his own kind to that of beasts�察�by making force�察�which is  their's�察�to be his rule of right�察�he renders himself liable to be  destroyed by the injured person�察�and the rest of mankind�察�that  will join with him in the execution of justice�察�as any other wild  beast�察�or noxious brute�察�with whom mankind can have neither  society nor security*。  And thus captives�察�taken in a just and  lawful war�察�and such only�察�are subject to a despotical power�察 �which�察�as it arises not from compact�察�so neither is it capable of  any�察�but is the state of war continued�此�for what compact can be  made with a man that is not master of his own life�拭�what  condition can he perform�拭�and if he be once allowed to be master  of his own life�察�the despotical�察�arbitrary power of his master  ceases。  He that is master of himself�察�and his own life�察�has a  right too to the means of preserving it�察�so that as soon as  compact enters�察�slavery ceases�察�and he so far quits his absolute  power�察�and puts an end to the state of war�察�who enters into  conditions with his captive。      ��*Another copy corrected by Mr。  Locke�察�has it thus�察�Noxious  brute that is destructive to their being。��

     Sec。 173。  Nature gives the first of these�察�viz。  paternal  power to parents for the benefit of their children during their  minority�察�to supply their want of ability�察�and understanding how  to manage their property。  ��By property I must be understood  here�察�as in other places�察�to mean that property which men have in  their persons as well as goods。�� Voluntary agreement gives the  second�察�viz。  political power to governors for the benefit of  their subjects�察�to secure them in the possession and use of their  properties。  And forfeiture gives the third despotical power to  lords for their own benefit�察�over those who are stripped of all  property。      Sec。 174。  He�察�that shall consider the distinct rise and  extent�察�and the different ends of these several powers�察�will  plainly see�察�that paternal power comes as far short of that of  the magistrate�察�as despotical exceeds it�察�and that absolute  dominion�察�however placed�察�is so far from being one kind of civil  society�察�that it is as inconsistent with it�察�as slavery is with  property。  Paternal power is only where minority makes the child  incapable to manage his property�察�political�察�where men have  property in their own disposal�察�and despotical�察�over such as have  no property at all。



                         CHAP。  XVI。

                         Of CONQUEST。

     Sec。 175。  THOUGH governments can originally have no other  rise than that before mentioned�察�nor polities be founded on any  thing but the consent of the people�察�yet such have been the  disorders ambition has filled the world with�察�that in the noise  of war�察�which makes so great a part of the history of mankind�察 �this consent is little taken notice of�此�and therefore many have  mistaken the force of arms for the consent of the people�察�and  reckon conquest as one of the originals of government。  But  conquest is as far from setting up any government�察�as demolishing  an house is from building a new one in the place。  Indeed�察�it  often makes way for a new frame of a common´wealth�察�by destroying  the former�察�but�察�without the consent of the people�察�can never  erect a new one。         Sec。 176。  That the aggressor�察�who puts himself into the  state of war with another�察�and unjustly invades another man's  right�察�can�察�by such an unjust war�察�never come to have a right  over the conquered�察�will be easily agreed by all men�察�who will  not think�察�that robbers and pyrates have a right of empire over  whomsoever they have force enough to master�察�or that men are  bound by promises�察�which unlawful force extorts from them。   Should a robber break into my house�察�and with a dagger at my  throat make me seal deeds to convey my estate to him�察�would this  give him any title�拭 �Just such a title�察�by his sword�察�has an  unjust conqueror�察�who forces me into submission。  The injury and  the crime is equal�察�whether committed by the wearer of a crown�察 �or some petty villain。  The title of the offender�察�and the number  of his followers�察�make no difference in the offence�察�unless it be  to aggravate it。  The only difference is�察�great robbers punish  little ones�察�to keep them in their obedience�察�but the great ones  are rewarded with laurels and triumphs�察�because they are too big  for the weak hands of justice in this world�察�and have the power  in their own possession�察�which should punish offenders。  What is  my remedy against a robber�察�that so broke into my house�拭 �Appeal  to the law for justice。  But perhaps justice is denied�察�or I am  crippled and cannot stir�察�robbed and have not the means to do it。   If God has taken away all means of seeking remedy�察�there is  nothing left but patience。  But my son�察�when able�察�may seek the  relief of the law�察�which I am denied�此�he or his son may renew his 

appeal�察�till he recover his right。  But the conquered�察�or their  children�察�have no court�察�no arbitrator on earth to appeal to。   Then they may appeal�察�as lephtha did�察�to heaven�察�and repeat their  appeal till they have recovered the native right of their  ancestors�察�which was�察�to have such a legislative over them�察�as  the majority should approve�察�and freely acquiesce in。  If it be  objected�察�This would cause endless trouble�察�I answer�察�no more  than justice does�察�where she lies open to all that appeal to her。   He that troubles his neighbour without a cause�察�is punished for  it by the justice of the court he appeals to�此�and he that appeals  to heaven must be sure he has right on his side�察�and a right too  that is worth the trouble and cost of the appeal�察�as he will  answer at a tribunal that cannot be deceived�察�and will be sure to  retribute to every one according to the mischiefs he hath created  to his fellow subjects�察�that is�察�any part of mankind�此�from whence  it is plain�察�that he that conquers in an unjust war can thereby  have no title to the subjection and obedience of the conquered。      Sec。 177。  But supposing victory favours the right side�察�let  us consider a conqueror in a lawful war�察�and see what power he  gets�察�and over whom。      First�察�It is plain he gets no power by his conquest over  those that conquered with him。  They that fought on his side  cannot suffer by the conquest�察�but must at least be as much  freemen as they were before。  And most commonly they serve upon  terms�察�and on condition to share with their leader�察�and enjoy a  part of the spoil�察�and other advantages that attend the  conquering sword�察�or at least have a part of the subdued country  bestowed upon them。  And the conquering people are not�察�I hope�察 �to be slaves by conquest�察�and wear their laurels only to shew  they are sacrifices to their leaders triumph。  They that found  absolute monarchy upon the title of the sword�察�make their heroes�察 �who are the founders of such monarchies�察�arrant Draw´can´sirs�察 �and forget they had any officers and soldiers that fought on  their side in the battles they won�察�or assisted them in the  subduing�察�or shared in possessing�察�the countries they mastered。   We are told by some�察�that the English monarchy is founded in the  Norman conquest�察�and that our princes have thereby a title t

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��3�� 家��1��

低辛嬬浪散議